Economic analysis for Auckland
July 2010 |
June 2010 |
April 2010 |
February 2010 |
November 2009 |
September 2009 |
July 2009 |
May 2009 |
April 2009 |
March 2009 |
December 2008 |
July 2008 |
March 2008 |
December 2007
April 2010
Keynes or Hayek?
Strap yourself in - it's the 1970s all over again
Auckland city's economic scoreboard
All values for Auckland city unless specified
Year ended (unless
specified) |
|
| Indicator |
|
Sep 08 |
|
Dec 08 |
|
Mar 09 |
|
Jun 09 |
|
Sep 09 |
|
Dec 09 |
|
Time series link |
|
GDP
(annual growth)1 |
|
1.87% |
|
-0.03% |
|
-1.36% |
|
-2.25% |
|
-2.41% |
|
-1.0% |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
Unemployment rate
(annual average)2 |
|
5.0% |
|
5.4% |
|
5.6% |
|
6.0% |
|
6.0% |
|
6.3% |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
Inflation
(national rate)3 |
|
5.1% |
|
3.4% |
|
3.0% |
|
1.9% |
|
1.7% |
|
2.0% |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
TWI
(national quarterly value)4 |
|
63.8 |
|
55.1 |
|
53.8 |
|
60.3 |
|
64.3 |
|
64.7 |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
Exports from Auckland
airport
and seaport
(annual growth)2 |
|
11.6% |
|
10.6% |
|
11.7% |
|
10.1% |
|
5.3% |
|
-7.3% |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
Retail sales growth
(annual growth)2 |
|
1.5% |
|
-0.5% |
|
-1.6% |
|
-2.0% |
|
-1.1% |
|
1.0% |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
Business investment intentions*
(net %)
(quarterly value)5 |
|
-36.4% |
|
-57.7% |
|
-51.8% |
|
-24.9% |
|
-10.8% |
|
-8.9% |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
Net migration
(annual growth)2 |
|
-5.6% |
|
0.6% |
|
10.0% |
|
22.7% |
|
26.4% |
|
30.7% |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
Annual number of residential
building consents2 |
|
1,561 |
|
1,438 |
|
1,149 |
|
874 |
|
881 |
|
916 |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
Annual value of
non-residential
building consents
($ million)2 |
|
$690 |
|
$731 |
|
$834 |
|
$945 |
|
$918 |
|
$971 |
|
See long-term analysis |
|
1 Infometrics Ltd
2 Statistics New Zealand
3 Calculated from the Consumer Price Index
4 Reserve Bank of New Zealand
5 Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion, NZIER
*Net percentage is calculated by subtracting the percentage of businesses saying they have less building investment intentions in the next 12 months than currently from those who intend to invest more in buildings in the next 12 months. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 1975, Margaret Thatcher famously walked into the Conservative Research Centre, reached into her briefcase and took out a book. It was Friedrich von Hayek's
The Constitution of Liberty. She held the book up for all to see. "This", she said sternly,
"is what we believe", and banged Hayek down on the table.
For the next 35 years, Hayek's philosophy of free markets governed the streets of the developed world. Government intervention and many other Keynesian ideas were disregarded - trade barriers fell, state owned companies were sold and the control of inflation was thrust onto centre stage.
Then, in late 2008, Lehman Brothers collapsed, sending shivers down the spine of the financial world. A recession gripped the major centres as company after company went into liquidation. Unemployment soared, beneficiary numbers marched upwards, exchange rates became highly volatile, and the price of gold sky rocketed as investors looked for safety. Politicians meanwhile, began marking out an escape route characterised by mass bailout packages.
In response to these events, The Guardian newspaper in the UK published an article titled ‘The epic battle has begun', describing the sway back to Keynesian economics from the Hayek approach of the past three decades.
"The gloves are off" The Guardian wrote, "and an epic ideological battle has begun." Keynes and Hayek were again in the ring together.
After October 2008, the Hayek-inspired leaders of the financial system were
caught in the headlights, grasping for an explanation to the crisis. This was no
easy task. To the disbelief of many of his followers, the Chairman of the
Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan famously acknowledged, in reference to his
free-market ideology; "I have found a flaw. I don't know how significant or permanent it is."
Representative Henry Waxman pressed for clarification of this remarkable statement,
"In other words Mr. Greenspan, you found that your view of the world, your
ideology, was not right, it was not working."
"Absolutely, precisely," Greenspan replied. "You know, that's precisely the reason I was shocked, because I have been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well."
Since the events of October 2008, the world has changed somewhat. Governments around the world have set forth on a
'Keynesian adventure', flooding financial markets with bailout funding. Friedrich von Hayek would not be pleased. According to Hayek, sound investment is governed by the perception of risk, and if investors are to be bailed out each time they make errors in the judgment of risks, what is to become of their behavior in the future?
Hayek may have been less critical of the New Zealand response however, which differs substantially from other countries. Our bailout package has been less expansive, with the main thrust coming from the retail guarantee scheme, which was designed to restore confidence in the overall finance sector. New Zealand resisted the temptation to bail out individual finance companies as was done at length in the United States. Further, New Zealand has been significantly more careful with deficit spending, looking to contain the growth of net public debt over the coming years. However, being such a small open economy, New Zealand is always at the mercy of the international financial system, a system that has been engulfed with public funding to keep it alive.
Published April 2010