|
Submission No. |
Name |
Decision Requested |
|
1/1 (1047KB) |
James A Horrocks |
Extend the residential 8c zoning to include 74-80
Remuera Road. |
|
2/1 (144KB) |
Suncern Properties (Khyber Pass) Limited |
Oppose the rezoning of the sites at 2-8 Osborne
Street and 481-487 Khyber Pass Road from business 3 to mixed use. |
|
2/2 |
Suncern Properties (Khyber Pass) Limited |
Oppose the addition of frontage and verandah
controls to 2-8 Osborne Street and 481-487 Khyber Pass Road. |
|
2/3 |
Suncern Properties (Khyber Pass) Limited |
Oppose the change in activity status with respect
to the "construction and/or relocation of new buildings and new
accessory buildings, including external additions and alterations to
existing buildings, and accessory buildings" from permitted to
restricted discretionary. |
|
3/1 (278KB) |
Andrew Yi |
6a zone to remain 6a (no specific sites
identified). |
|
4/1 (1089KB) |
The Newmarket Protection Society |
That rezoning proposals for the areas east of
Middleton Road, specifically changes from residential 6a and 7c to
residential 8c, within the block bounded by Mamie Street, Middleton
Road, Remuera Road and Belmont Terrace and encompassing Lauriston Avenue
be deleted. |
|
4/2 |
The Newmarket Protection Society |
That the areas west of Middleton Road generally
known as Broadway Park and collectively zoned residential 7b and 7c be
rezoned as residential 8c. |
|
5/1 (89KB) |
Vector Limited |
The zoning of 9 Edgerley Avenue, Newmarket be
amended so that the zoning is mixed use (instead of the residential 8c
proposed by the plan change) . |
|
6/1 (32KB) |
Warren and Sally Dalzell |
Protests particularly at the proposed 5 storey heights at 3 and 5 Mamie
Street, along the northern side of Lauriston Avenue, and the eastern
side of Middleton Road. |
|
6/2 |
Warren and Sally Dalzell |
No more Pyongyang projects. |
|
7/1 (1101KB) |
Owen L Lockerbie |
That rezoning proposals for areas east of Middleton
Road specifically changes from residential 6a and 7c to residential 8c,
within the block bounded by Mamie Street, Middleton Road, Remuera Road
and Belmont Terrace and encompassing Lauriston Avenue be deleted. |
|
7/2 |
Owen L Lockerbie |
That the areas west of Middleton Road generally
known as Broadway Park and collectively zoned residential 7b and 7c be
rezoned as residential 8c. |
|
8/1 (34KB) |
Mario Gonzalez |
There should be less parking, easier pedestrian
access, and more intense development over a broader area. |
|
8/2 |
Mario Gonzalez |
Auckland City Council needs to be proactive in
planning linkages |
|
9/1 (1210KB) |
Ross Vernall Family Trust |
Rezone the site at 41-43 Gillies Avenue to reflect
the actual situation (being commercial purposes). |
|
9/2 |
Ross Vernall Family Trust |
Oppose plan change as it is changing period housing
to mixed use and does not develop areas along main traffic routes to
utilize public transport. |
|
10/1 (845KB) |
Newmarket Business Association |
Auckland City Council needs to address its policies
on parking as the onsite carparking requirements are too stringent. |
|
10/2 |
Newmarket Business Association |
Auckland City Council needs to address its strident
policy on development contributions. |
|
10/3 |
Newmarket Business Association |
Supports residential 8c zoning, increased height
and development potential in business 3 and mixed use zones and the
rezoning of business 4 areas to mixed use. |
|
11/1 (88KB) |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan change by implementing new and more
appropriate planning rules and controls in the new "residential 8"
zoning to recognise the physical and neighbourhood characteristics of
these sites, the locality, aspect, orientation, site sizes, width and
depth, the topography etc of this part of Newmarket (particular
reference is made to clause 7.8.2 of the Operative Isthmus District
Plan). |
|
12/1 (86KB) |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan change by retaining the current 1.5m
front yard rule implementing for this new "residential 8" zoning to
recognise the physical and neighbourhood characteristics of these sites,
the locality, aspect, orientation, site sizes, width and depth, the
topography etc of this part of Newmarket . |
|
13/1 (92KB) |
BA Trustees Limited |
Delete 524 and 526 Parnell Road from Part E
amendment to Appendix B to the planning maps, Map D09-62 Newmarket
Growth Area Structure Plan Diagram and the outer parking area. |
|
13/2 |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan change
by clarifying whether or not Part E Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan
diagram applies to 524 and 526 Parnell Road. If it does not, then the
subject sites and locality needs to be deleted from the "outer parking
area" notation. |
|
13/3 |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan change
to clarify that rule 7.8.2.15, driveways and car parking of the current
residential 8 zone development rules applies to 524 and 526 Parnell Road
and locality. |
|
14/1 (65KB) |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan change
by inserting the word "Generally,...." before the word "separate" in
assessment criterion (c) in clause 7.2.1 New buildings and accessory
buildings (including external additions and alterations) (ii) Street
level. |
|
15/1 (99KB) |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan
change's clause 6.1, residential 8 zone, Activities by listing dairies,
educational facilities, healthcare services, places of assembly,
boarding house/hostel and visitor accommodation as restricted
discretionary activities for the properties around the sites at 524 and
526 Parnell Road. |
|
16/1 (100KB) |
BA Trustees Limited |
Delete 524 and 526
Parnell Road from Part E, Amendment to Appendix B to the planning maps,
Map D09-62 Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan diagram and the outer
parking area. |
|
16/2 |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan change
by clarifying whether or not Part E Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan
diagram applies to 524 and 526 Parnell Road. If it does not, then the
subject sites and locality needs to be deleted from the "outer parking
area" notation. |
|
16/3 |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan change
to clarify that Rule 7.8.2.15, driveways and car parking and Part 12,
Transportation of the current residential 8 zone development rules
applies to 524 and 526 Parnell Road and locality. |
|
17/1 (100KB) |
BA Trustees Limited |
Delete 524 and 526
Parnell Road from Part E Amendment to Appendix B to the planning maps,
Map D09-62 Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan Diagram and the Outer
Parking Area. |
|
17/2 |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan change
by clarifying whether or not Part E Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan
diagram applies to 524 and 526 Parnell Road. If it does not, then the
subject sites and locality needs to be deleted from the "outer parking
area" notation. |
|
17/3 |
BA Trustees Limited |
Amend the plan change
to clarify that Rule 7.8.2.15, driveways and car parking of the current
residential 8 zone development rules applies to 524 and 526 Parnell Road
and locality. |
|
18/1 (719KB) |
AMP Capital Investors |
Rule 8.2.4(i) needs to
be amended to be practical for all ground levels on the site (this can
only be determined during the Comprehensive Development Plan process). |
|
18/2 |
AMP Capital Investors |
Rule 8.2.6(ii) needs
to be amended to provide sufficient width for a 2 way carpark access. |
|
18/3 |
AMP Capital Investors |
Amend the traffic
related objectives and policies so as to not unnecessarily constrain the
use and development of the site at 314-390 Khyber Pass Road. |
|
18/4 |
AMP Capital Investors |
Amend rule 9.7.1(i) to
enable flexibility in site layout and design in particular, by removing
requirements for east/west link across the site and a minimum of the
2500mē areas of open space. |
|
18/5 |
AMP Capital Investors |
Amendment to rule
9.7.1 (ii) to enable additional GFA to be established on the site. |
|
18/6 |
AMP Capital Investors |
Amend rule 9.7.1 (iii)
to increase the maximum height, in particular provide opportunity for
landmark buildings and to align with the maximum number of storeys
permitted. The particular heights sought are
- Area A = maximum 24m/ 6 storeys (except for the
area to which the volcanic cone height restrictions apply)
- Area B = maximum 32m / 8 storeys
- Areas C and D = maximum 48m / 12 storeys
|
|
18/7 |
AMP Capital Investors |
A re-draft of the plan
change wording to make it clear that the Comprehensive Development Plan
process manages the quantum and mix of activities that can establish on
the site. |
|
18/8 |
AMP Capital Investors |
Insert a new rule
which permits up to 40,000m2 of retail GFA on the site. |
|
19/1 (303KB) |
Auckland City Council |
That Part A of
proposed plan change 196 - Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan be
amended by annotating the map to show that the site at 50 Gillies
Avenue, Epsom is to be rezoned from residential 2a to business 3. |
|
19/2 |
Auckland City Council |
That Part E of
proposed plan change 196 - Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan be
amended by identifying the site at 86 Broadway, Newmarket is within the
"core parking area". |
|
19/3 |
Auckland City Council |
That Part A of
proposed plan change 196 - Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan be
amended by annotating the map to show that the rear portion of the site
at 277-305 Broadway is to be rezoned from business 4 to business 3
(rather than from business 4 to mixed use as was notified). |
|
20/1 (158KB) |
Auckland Regional Council |
The removal of minimum
on-site parking requirements. |
|
20/2 |
Auckland Regional Council |
The acknowledgement of
the heritage value of the railway station and signal box, either by
their identification as character buildings within Proposed Plan Change
196, or by committing to schedule these structures at their new location
through a future plan change. |
|
20/3 |
Auckland Regional Council |
The submitter would
support the scheduling of additional items within Newmarket centre,
particularly those listed as category A or B in the 1996 Newmarket
Heritage Study. |
|
21/1 (27KB) |
Mccoll Property Limited |
The proposed plan
(particularly clause 8.2.6) should be amended so that access to sites
with frontage of less than 50m should be not more than 6 metres as it
currently is in the mixed use zone. |
|
21/2 |
Mccoll Property Limited |
Clause 8.2.9 (iii)
carparking, should read as a minimum of 1:60 of gross floor area and a
maximum of 1:40 gross floor area. |
|
22/1 (86KB) |
Matthew Paetz |
Add as an additional
resource management issue under Section 3.0 of the plan change the
following:
- Encouraging minimisation of energy and resource
consumption, reduction of storm water runoff, and the health and
wellbeing of citizens through the encouragement of green building
principles.
|
|
22/2 |
Matthew Paetz |
Add additional
objectives and policies in Section 5.4 of the plan change as follows: To achieve a built
environment in Newmarket that minimises energy and resource use and
consumption.
- By encouraging the construction of new buildings to
satisfy high Green Star ratings
- By encouraging the renovation of existing buildings
to satisfy high Green Star ratings
- By encouraging the implementation of green roofs to
minimise storm water runoff, contribute positively to building
insulation, and enhance amenity values to building occupants through
enhanced visual amenity and recreational area.
|
|
22/3 |
Matthew Paetz |
Add additional
assessment criteria for new buildings under Section 5.4 of the District
Plan as follows:
- Green design principles have been incorporated into the design of the
new building
|
|
22/4 |
Matthew Paetz |
Add additional bonus
elements under Section 8.2.3 of the plan change as follows: Bonus Element
Bonus Floor Area Ratio
4 star - Green Star
Building Rating 1:1
5 or 6 star - Green
Star Building Rating 2:1
Green Roof
1:1 |
|
22/5 |
Matthew Paetz |
Approve plan change
with amendments |
|
23/1 (114KB) |
Finstar Management Limited |
Clause 8.8.10.4 of the
operative plan needs to be amended such that the relevant building in
relation to boundary controls of clause 7.8.2.4 as they apply to
residential 8 zoned land are referenced. |
|
23/2 |
Finstar Management Limited |
Clause 8.2.2 of the
plan change needs to be amended to make direct reference to the relevant
building to boundary controls where mixed use sites in the Newmarket
structure plan area abut or adjoin residential 8 zoned sites. |
|
23/3 |
Finstar Management Limited |
Exclude sites located
within the extremities of the outer parking areas from having to comply
with the "maximum" car parking controls |
|
23/4 |
Finstar Management Limited |
Approve the plan
change with amendments |
|
24/1 (56KB) |
B and C Shaw Limited |
Amend clause 8.2.9
(iv) so that the parking levels specified are a maximum (rather than a
minimum) of 1 space per unit for units less than 75m2 and 2 spaces for
units greater than 75m2. |
|
25/1 (78KB) |
B and C Shaw Limited |
Amend Activity Table
7.7.5 to provide a new entry that classifies visitor accommodation or
housing for the elderly as a restricted discretionary activity (with
associated assessment matters) when established in accordance with an
approved Planned Unit Development Plan in the residential 8 zone. |
|
25/2 |
B and C Shaw Limited |
Amend Activity Table
7.7.5 to provide a new entry that classifies visitor accommodation or
housing for the elderly as a restricted discretionary activity (with
associated assessment matters) when established in accordance with an
approved Planned Unit Development Plan for the following properties. Address
9
Edgerley Avenue
11
Edgerley Avenue
15
Edgerley Avenue
14
Edgerley Avenue
12
Edgerley Avenue
10
Edgerley Avenue
13 Alpers
Avenue |
|
26/1 (105KB) |
B and C Shaw Limited |
To adopt and implement
the plan change, including rezoning of the eastern portion of 70 Gillies
Avenue (Lot 2 DP 3131509) from residential 6a to residential 8c (diagram
provided). |
|
27/1 (131KB) |
B and C Shaw Limited |
To adopt and implement
the plan change, subject to application of a Special Height Limit of 21m
with a maximum of 6 storeys for the following properties that front onto
Edgerley Avenue (diagram provided). Address
9
Edgerley Avenue
11
Edgerley Avenue
15
Edgerley Avenue
14
Edgerley Avenue
12
Edgerley Avenue
10
Edgerley Avenue
8
Edgerley Avenue
6
Edgerley Avenue
4
Edgerley Avenue |
|
28/1 (111KB) |
B and C Shaw Limited |
To adopt and implement
the plan change, subject to rezoning of the following properties (as
identified on the attached diagram) from residential 7a to mixed use.
Address
9
Edgerley Avenue
11
Edgerley Avenue
15
Edgerley Avenue |
|
28/2 |
B and C Shaw Limited |
Change the activity
status of offices in the residential 8c from a discretionary to
restricted discretionary activity within activity table 7.7.5
specifically for the following properties:
Address
9
Edgerley Avenue
11
Edgerley Avenue
15
Edgerley Avenue |
|
29/1 (48KB) |
B and C Shaw Limited |
To adopt and implement
the plan change in its entirety. |
|
30/1 (116KB) |
Ontrack |
Add a policy to
clause 5.2 recognising that reverse sensitivity effects arising from
noise and visual effects can be an impediment to the existing operation
and future upgrading of rail infrastructure and that such effects need
to be avoided, particularly with respect to any future electrification
of the track. |
|
30/2 |
Ontrack |
Clarify clause 9.2 to
recognise that any future connection through to Carlton Gore Road will
need to be grade separated. |
|
30/3 |
Ontrack |
Add a policy into
clause 9.2 which recognises that master planning and development of the
Lion Nathan site needs to be carried out in such a way that adequate
opportunities for safe crossing of the rail corridor are provided for
and measures are taken to prevent trespass within the corridor. |
|
30/4 |
Ontrack |
Add a criterion under
clause 9.6.1(i) which requires consideration be given to the extent to
which the comprehensive development plan responds appropriately to the
adjacent rail corridor in terms of providing for safe crossing, avoiding
trespass, and avoiding visual and aural reverse sensitivity effects |
|
30/5 |
Ontrack |
Clarify clause
9.6.1(iv)(e) to recognise that any crossing to link Carlton Gore Road
will need to be grade separated. |
|
31/1 (217KB) |
Vodafone New Zealand Limited |
Introduce provisions
that:
- Are necessary to achieve the purpose of the
Resource Management Act 1991 and are justified in resource management
terms
- Take a more balanced approach to the promotion of
sustainable management, rather than focusing primarily on urban design
issues, in order to enable people and the community to provide for their
social, economic and cultural well-being.
- Give clear recognition to the importance of
network utility services to the economic viability and growth of
Newmarket and the well-being of the community.
- Reduce the need for resource consents associated
with the maintenance, installation and operation of network utility
services.
- Recognise that the maintenance and provision of
network utility services is an important resource management issue and
strategy for the successful growth of Newmarket.
- Introduce new objectives, policies, rules and
assessment criteria that recognise and provide for network utility
services and acknowledge their importance for the functioning of
Newmarket as a significant commercial centre
- Introduce new objectives, policies, rules and
assessment criteria that address the issue of reverse sensitivity
between various activities
|
|
32/1 (403KB) |
Wallace Flats Limited |
Opposes the
identification of 270-278 Broadway as a Character Building in D09-62
Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan Diagram. |
|
32/2 |
Wallace Flats Limited |
There needs to be some
incentive or compensation for the owners of character buildings. |
|
32/3 |
Wallace Flats Limited |
Auckland City Council
must engage with meaningful consultation with affected parties |
|
33/1 (74KB) |
ING Property Trust Number 4 Limited |
Approve the plan
change as proposed |
|
34/1 (74KB) |
Lornie Properties Limited |
Approve the plan
change as proposed |
|
36/1 (78KB) |
Dean Ellwood, Warwick James and Jennifer
Goulding-James |
Withdraw proposed
changes to development controls relating to height requirements for
buildings and sites fronting Carlton Gore Road (i.e. retain 15m height
limit) or make bonus height a discretion activity with affected parties'
consent. |
|
37/1 (72KB) |
Dean Ellwood, Warwick James and Jennifer
Goulding-James |
Reject the bonus
provision to increase building height to 27m for properties with
frontage to Khyber Pass Road. |
|
37/2 |
Dean Ellwood, Warwick James and Jennifer
Goulding-James |
Require assessment of
any comprehensive development of the Lion Breweries site to have regard
for the effect of air emissions on the proposed development, the
development's impact on air emissions, any mitigation measures to
minimize adverse effects of new development on health of the community,
the quality of the environment and the effect of vehicular emissions on
the health of users of the reserves. |
|
38/1 (35KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Allow new parking
ratios but delete the cycle storage provisions in clause 8.2.9 |
|
39/1 (35KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Delete the provisions
recycle storage in clause 8.2.9 |
|
40/1 (34KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Delete clause 8.2.8
(outlook) as it relates to conversion of existing buildings. |
|
41/1 (35KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Delete clause 8.2.4
(street and lower level controls) in relation to alterations to existing
buildings and new buildings. |
|
42/1 (38KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Amend clause 8.2.3
(site intensity) to increase the basic FAR of the mixed use zone to 4:1. |
|
43/1 (41KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Amend clause 8.2.3
(site intensity) to increase the basic FAR in the business 3 zone in
Newmarket to 6:1 (in line with inner city zones in the Central Area)
with a maximum total floor area of 8:1. |
|
44/1 (36KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Allow the new mixed
use height limits in clause 8.2.1 as proposed. |
|
45/1 (38KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Accept the new maximum
height limits for the business 3 zone in clause 8.2.1 but allow sites
subject to special height limits to be included in the change i.e be
able to use the proposed height limits. |
|
46/1 (37KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Delete the provision
in clause 6.2 which requires a restricted discretionary consent for the
construction/ and or relocation of new buildings including external
alterations to existing buildings. |
|
47/1 (39KB) |
Masfen Holdings Limited |
Delete the verandah
and retail frontage control from the site at 61-73 Davis Crescent |
|
48/1 (300KB) |
Tram Lease Limited |
Opposes the proposed
plan modifications in relevant part and seeks that the proposed plan
modifications be withdrawn. |
|
48/2 |
Tram Lease Limited |
Sub-clauses 7.1 and
7.2 be amended in relevant part as follows: 7.1....In considering
these applications, the council's discretion will be limited to the
matters identified in these criteria
7.2....In considering
these applications, the council's discretion will be limited to the
matters identified in these criteria |
|
48/3 |
Tram Lease Limited |
Clause 7.2.1(i)
General be deleted in its entirety and substituted by the following
replacement provision: 7.2.1 New buildings
and accessory buildings (including external additions and alterations)
- General
The extent to which:
- The building design (including architectural character,
expression, articulation, modulation and use of materials) is high
quality, creative and responds to the local context
- The building aligns with the street boundary of the site. Minor
departures from the street boundary alignment (e.g. recessed pedestrian
entrances and widows) are acceptable where they provide attractive
architectural features and where the overall continuity of alignment
with the street boundary is not compromised.
- The building height, in relation to the street width, is
appropriate to define and contain the street space.
- The scale and rhythm of architectural features (such as windows,
doorways, details, materials and colours) enhance the streetscape.
- Blank facades devoid of modulation, relief or surface detail are
avoided
- The street elevation of buildings on large or amalgamated sites
are scaled and composed to visually reflect and express the typical
prevailing subdivision pattern and/or the width of neighbouring
buildings
- The building structure and floor to floor heights are designed to
enable the building to be easily adapted to new uses in the future
- Service and vehicle access interruptions to the continuity of
building frontage are minimized
- High quality, durable and easily maintained materials are used,
particularly at street level
- Side or rear walls are designed to be visually attractive
- The building is designed in accordance with the Safety Guidelines
in Annexure 16 of the Plan
- Green design principles, e.g. rain gardens, are incorporated
into the site landscape design where practicable.
|
|
48/4 |
Tram Lease Limited |
Clause 7.2.2(i)
General be deleted in its entirety and substituted by the following
replacement provision:
- Whether a site and context analysis of the proposed demolition
of the subject character building demonstrates that long-term retention
of the building will make a positive contribution to the special
character of the streetscape as a whole.
- The extent to which the character qualities and original design
features of the subject building (if any remain in situ) are visible
from public open space.
- The structural and physical condition of the subject character
building.
- Whether the cost of redevelopment of the subject building so as
to ensure its long-term retention is commercially sustainable
- Whether any proposed new building(s) will have a positive effect
of the character of the local area.
|
|
48/5 |
Tram Lease Limited |
Clause 8.2.1 be
amended in relevant part to read as follows: That the heading of
clause 8.2.1 be deleted and substituted by "Maximum permitted height";
That sub-clauses
8.2.1(i) and (ii) be amended to read:
.... the
maximum permitted height and maximum number of storeys set out.....; |
|
48/6 |
Tram Lease Limited |
Clause 8.2.3 be
amended in relevant part to read as follows:
- That the heading of clause 8.2.3 be deleted and substituted by
"Maximum permitted site intensity";
- That the floor area ratio for Business 3 zoned land set out in the
table in sub-clause 8.2.3(i) be amended to read :
- For sites with no frontage to Nuffield Street - 10:1 permitted basic
floor area ratio;
- For sites with frontage to Nuffield Street - 6:1 permitted basic
floor area ration;
- That criteria, or a cross-reference to relevant criteria in the
Plan, be provided regarding the cycle and pedestrian ways bonus element;
- That provision be made for "energy efficiency and conservation" as
an additional bonus element, with a bonus floor area ratio of at least)
2:1.
|
|
48/7 |
Tram Lease Limited |
- The definition of "Vacant sites" be amended so that sites may
remain vacant for up to 2 years;
- That a
definition of "Character buildings" be inserted in part 13 of the plan,
namely:
- "Character
buildings" means those buildings identified on the planning maps as
character buildings by virtue of the combined characteristics of their
architectural design or appearance and activities and the contribution
that such characteristics make to the special character of the
streetscape as a whole.
|
|
48/8 |
Tram Lease
Limited |
The character
building notation for 2 Nuffield Street, Newmarket, be deleted from Part
E: Amendment to Appendix B to the planning maps, and the amended map be
revised accordingly. |
|
49/1
(100KB) |
Grafton
Residents Association Incorporated |
In respect of
the proposed comprehensive development of 314-390 Khyber Pass Road, the
submitter seeks objectives, policies, rules and criteria which expressly
provide for a percentage (say 10-20%) of the area to be expressly
allocated towards affordable housing. |
|
49/2 |
Grafton
Residents Association Incorporated |
Any parking
requirements should not detract from the overall vibrancy of the
Newmarket area i.e. should not be clogged with carparking buildings. |
|
49/3 |
Grafton
Residents Association Incorporated |
The Auckland
City Council acquire or designate the northern side of Khyber Pass Road
(from Broadway) in order to make future provision for transport/light
rail |
|
49/4 |
Grafton
Residents Association Incorporated |
Proper provision
should be made for pedestrian usage. |
|
49/5 |
Grafton
Residents Association Incorporated |
The rules,
objectives and policies elsewhere within the business 3 zone should not
detract or dilute the significance of Broadway as the premier retail
area, such that provisions which allow retail premises elsewhere in the
Newmarket Structure Plan area should not dilute the Broadway shopping
experience. |
|
49/6 |
Grafton
Residents Association Incorporated |
Auckland City
Council should expressly provide for reserves/open space in the plan
change, either by expressly designating a property or properties for
acquisition by Council, or by expressly allocating reserve monies for
such allocation. |
|
49/7 |
Grafton
Residents Association Incorporated |
Greater thought
and provision should be given towards development incentives, which
create incentives for comprehensive redevelopment to recognise the
significance of passive recreation/pedestrian/public areas to overcome
the present shortage of reserves/open space. |
|
49/8 |
Grafton
Residents Association Incorporated |
The submitter is
generally supportive of the comprehensive development requirements for
the Lion Breweries site. |
|
49/9 |
Grafton
Residents Association Incorporated |
The submitter
supports the retention of Broadway as the premier retail strip. |
|
50/1 (403KB) |
Rex Owen and
Marlene D Webb |
No change to
height restrictions on Khyber Pass or the surrounding area. |
|
50/2 |
Rex Owen and
Marlene D Webb |
Limit non
residential parking and traffic in Seccombes Road |
|
50/3 |
Rex Owen and
Marlene D Webb |
Commitment that
any additional residential will not in anyway cause further noise
increase day and night that could affect our sleep or health, over and
above current noise levels. |
|
51/1 (81KB) |
L and Y Holdings
Limited |
Amend plan
change to allow the acquisition of land with Broadway frontage deemed
necessary by Auckland City Council, its clearance (i.e. demolition of
existing buildings) and the construction of improved pedestrian access
through Station Square to the railway station. |
|
52/1 |
Tara Nathan |
Accept the
proposed rezoning of residential zones 6a, 7a, 7b and 7c to residential
8c. |
|
53/1 (173KB) |
88 Broadway
Limited |
That 88 Broadway
be permitted to gain access onto Broadway. For the purposes of this
submission 88 Broadway shall be taken to mean Lot 1 DP 168497 and Lot 1
DP 107126 NA94B/268 and Lot 5 DP 156885 NA 94B/268. |
|
53/2 |
88 Broadway
Limited |
That the whole
of 88 Broadway be included in the Core Parking District but be able to
be accessed off of Broadway. For the purposes of this submission 88
Broadway shall be taken to mean Lot 1 DP 168497 and Lot 1 DP 107126
NA94B/268 and Lot 5 DP 156885 NA 94B/268. |
|
53/3 |
88 Broadway
Limited |
That
applications to modify development controls be assessed as restricted
discretionary activities (not as a discretionary activity as specified
by clause 8.2(iv) of the plan change). |
|
53/4 |
88 Broadway
Limited |
That the minimum
floor to ceiling height for the ground floor be amended from 4.0 metres
floor to ceiling, to 2.8 metres, or 4.0 metres floor to floor on sloping
sites or sites with sloping footpaths. |
|
53/5 |
88 Broadway
Limited |
That where the
number of apartments proposed in a development exceeds 10 that the
mixture of apartments permitted by the plan change be amended such that
the combined number of studios and 1 bedroom apartments shall not exceed
70% of the total number of residential units and that the remaining 30%
shall consist of 2 bedrooms or more. |
|
53/6 |
88 Broadway
Limited |
Submitter
opposes the parking provisions that are applied to 88 Broadway Limited.
For the purposes of this submission 88 Broadway shall be taken to mean
Lot1 DP 168497 and Lot 1DP 107126 NA94B/268 and Lot 5 DP 156885
NA94B/268. |
|
53/7 |
88 Broadway
Limited |
Submitter
opposes the street and lower level controls and seeks that these be
amended. |
|
54/1
(120KB) |
Auckland
Regional Transport Authority (ARTA) |
That the
proposed plan change be adopted |
|
55/1
(95KB) |
Melanesian
Mission Trust Board Limited |
Amend the plan
change to clarify (or compensate for) the potential effects of the road
link shown on figure 3 on the site at 77 Carlton Gore Road. |
|
56/1 (41KB) |
Remuera Heritage
Incorporated |
The proposed
rezoning of land on Belmont Terrace to residential 8c is opposed. |
|
56/2 |
Remuera Heritage
Incorporated |
A full heritage
assessment is required of all that area within the Remuera district,
which is proposed for re-zoning. |
|
57/1 (108KB) |
Chevron NZ
Limited |
That an
exception be added to table 6.2 providing for service stations that
existed as at 12 August 2007 as a restricted discretionary activity. |
|
58/1 (125KB) |
Real Estate
Institute of New Zealand |
Include the site
at 29 Gillies Avenue in the Newmarket Growth Structure Plan Area. |
|
58/2 |
Real Estate
Institute of New Zealand |
Rezone 29
Gillies Avenue, and other sites in the vicinity, some form of business
or mixed use zoning i.e business 3 or 4 or mixed use (plan of land to be
rezoned has been supplied). |
|
59/1 (328KB) |
Gadol
Corporation Group |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary. |
|
59/2 |
Gadol
Corporation Group |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows:
To
modify/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required
office/industry in the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum
of 1 space per 60m2 of gross floor area and a maximum of 1
space per 40m2 gross floor area. |
|
59/3 |
Gadol
Corporation Group |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows:
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25 m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30m2
where floor area is in excess of 500m2 and 80% of the parking
is for visitors and customers. |
|
59/4 |
Gadol
Corporation Group |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows:
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular attention is made to amending clause 8.2.9(i) first paragraph
to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not requiring
any on-site parking. |
|
59/5 |
Gadol
Corporation Group |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under Part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setback |
|
59/6 |
Gadol
Corporation Group |
To adopt parts
1-5 of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
60/1 (327KB) |
Newmarket Dental
Group |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary. |
|
60/2 |
Newmarket Dental
Group |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows:
To
modify/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required
office/industry in the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum
of 1 space per 60m2 of gross floor area and a maximum of 1
space per 40m2 gross floor area.
|
|
60/3 |
Newmarket Dental
Group |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows:
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25 m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30m2
where floor area is in excess of 500 m2 and 80% of the
parking is for visitors and customers.
|
|
60/4 |
Newmarket Dental
Group |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows:
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular reference is made to amending clause 8.2.9(i) first paragraph
to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not requiring
any on-site parking.
|
|
60/5 |
Newmarket Dental
Group |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under Part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks, |
|
60/6 |
Newmarket Dental
Group |
To adopt parts
1-5 of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
61/1 (327KB) |
Peter Bolot
Family Trust |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary. |
|
61/2 |
Peter Bolot
Family Trust |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To
modify/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required
office/industry in the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum
of 1 space per 60m2 of gross floor area and a maximum of 1
space per 40m2 gross floor area. |
|
61/3 |
Peter Bolot
Family Trust |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows:
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25 m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30m2
where floor area is in excess of 500 m2 and 80% of the
parking is for visitors and customers. |
|
61/4 |
Peter Bolot
Family Trust |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows:
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular reference is made to amending clause 8.2.9(i) first paragraph
to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not requiring
any on-site parking. |
|
61/5 |
Peter Bolot
Family Trust |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the Plan Change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks, |
|
61/6 |
Peter Bolot
Family Trust |
To adopt parts
1-5 of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
62/1 (326KB) |
Teed Street
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary. |
|
62/2 |
Teed Street
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To modify
/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required office/industry in
the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum of 1 space per 60m2
of gross floor area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 gross floor area. |
|
62/3 |
Teed Street
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30 m2
where floor area is in excess of 500 m2 and 80% of the parking is
for visitors and customers. |
|
62/4 |
Teed Street
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular reference is made to amending clause 8.2.9 (i) first
paragraph to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not
requiring any on-site parking. |
|
62/5 |
Teed Street
Properties Limited |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under Part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks. |
|
62/6 |
Teed Street
Properties Limited |
To adopt parts 1
-5 of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
63/1 (328KB) |
Zelig
Corporation Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary. |
|
63/2 |
Zelig
Corporation Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To modify
/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required office/industry in
the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum of 1 space per 60m2
of gross floor area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 gross floor area. |
|
63/3 |
Zelig
Corporation Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30 m2
where floor area is in excess of 500 m2 and 80% of the parking is
for visitors and customers. |
|
63/4 |
Zelig
Corporation Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular reference is made to amending clause 8.2.9 (i) first
paragraph to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not
requiring any on-site parking. |
|
63/5 |
Zelig
Corporation Limited |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under Part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks. |
|
63/6 |
Zelig
Corporation Limited |
To adopt parts
1-5 of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
64/1 (327KB) |
Geffen Holdings
Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary. |
|
64/2 |
Geffen Holdings
Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To modify
/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required office/industry in
the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum of 1 space per 60m2
of gross floor area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 gross floor area. |
|
64/3 |
Geffen Holdings
Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30 m2
where floor area is in excess of 500 m2 and 80% of the parking is
for visitors and customers.
|
|
64/4 |
Geffen Holdings
Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular reference is made to amending clause 8.2.9 (i) first
paragraph to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not
requiring any on-site parking. |
|
64/5 |
Geffen Holdings
Limited |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under Part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks. |
|
64/6 |
Geffen Holdings
Limited |
To adopt parts
1-5 of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
65/1 (328KB) |
Upland
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary. |
|
65/2 |
Upland
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To modify
/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required office/industry in
the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum of 1 space per 60m2
of gross floor area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 gross floor area. |
|
65/3 |
Upland
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30 m2
where floor area is in excess of 500 m2 and 80% of the parking is
for visitors and customers. |
|
65/4 |
Upland
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular reference is made to amending clause 8.2.9 (i) first
paragraph to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not
requiring any on-site parking. |
|
65/5 |
Upland
Properties Limited |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under Part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks. |
|
66/1 (327KB) |
Westir
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary. |
|
66/2 |
Westir
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To modify
/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required office/industry in
the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum of 1 space per 60m2
of gross floor area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 gross floor area. |
|
66/3 |
Westir
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30 m2
where floor area is in excess of 500 m2 and 80% of the parking is
for visitors and customers. |
|
66/4 |
Westir
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular reference is made to amending clause 8.2.9 (i) first
paragraph to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not
requiring any on-site parking. |
|
66/5 |
Westir
Properties Limited |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks. |
|
66/6 |
Westir
Properties Limited |
Adopt parts 1-5
of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
67/1 (329KB) |
Arrabo Holdings
Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary. |
|
67/2 |
Arrabo Holdings
Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To modify
/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required office/industry in
the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum of 1 space per 60m2
of gross floor area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 gross floor area. |
|
67/3 |
Arrabo Holdings
Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30 m2
where floor area is in excess of 500 m2 and 80% of the parking is
for visitors and customers. |
|
67/4 |
Arrabo Holdings
Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular reference is made to amending clause 8.2.9 (i) first
paragraph to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not
requiring any on-site parking. |
|
67/5 |
Arrabo Holdings
Limited |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under Part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks. |
|
67/6 |
Arrabo Holdings
Limited |
Adopt parts 1-5
of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
68/1 (328KB) |
Peter Bolot |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity
under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (iii) as
necessary |
|
68/2 |
Peter Bolot |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To modify
/correct part 8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required office/industry in
the outer car parking area to provide for a minimum of 1 space per 60m2
of gross floor area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 gross floor area. |
|
68/3 |
Peter Bolot |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows;
To clarify that
ground floor activities in the outer car parking area require 1 space
per 25m2 gross floor area but can provide 1 space per 30 m2
where floor area is in excess of 500 m2 and 80% of the parking is
for visitors and customers. |
|
68/4 |
Peter Bolot |
To amend part
8.2.9 in relation to car parking and cycle storage as follows:
To clarify that
sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road, Nuffield Street or
Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the core parking areas.
Particular attention is made to amending clause 8.2.9(i) first paragraph
to reflect frontage rather than access as the trigger for not requiring
any on-site parking. |
|
68/5 |
Peter Bolot |
To retain the
increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3 and
mixed use zones as set out under Part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page 19
of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with respect
to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks. |
|
68/6 |
Peter Bolot |
Adopt parts 1-5
of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
69/1 (282KB) |
Gregory W
Chapman and Bonnie J Chapman |
Amend Part 8 to
increase the maximum height control for the mixed use zone, as set out
in 8.2.1 (i), to 21m, and to increase the maximum number of storeys to
8; |
|
69/2 |
Gregory W
Chapman and Bonnie J Chapman |
Amend Part 8 to
delete the bonus height control as it relates to the mixed use zone. |
|
69/3 |
Gregory W
Chapman and Bonnie J Chapman |
Amend Part 8 to
clearly provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out
within the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary
activity under part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (ii)
as necessary. |
|
69/4 |
Gregory W
Chapman and Bonnie J Chapman |
The drafting of
the parking standards is ambiguous, in particular the parking standard
for the outer carparking area for offices, industry etc should read a
"minimum of 1 space per 60mē of gross floor area and a maximum of 1
space per 40mē of gross floor area". |
|
69/5 |
Gregory W
Chapman and Bonnie J Chapman |
Adopt parts 1-5
of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
70/1 (297KB) |
Fountain Head
Properties Limited |
Include the
block bounded by Broadway, Mahuru Street, Nuffield Street and Balm
Street within the core parking area as shown on part E of the plan
change. |
|
70/2 |
Fountain Head
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8 to
increase the maximum height control for business 3 zoned sites with
frontages onto Nuffield St, as set out in 8.2.1 (i), to 33m, and to
increase the maximum number of storeys to 10. |
|
70/3 |
Fountain Head
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8 to
delete the bonus height control as it relates to business 3 zoned sites
with frontages onto Nuffield St, as set out in 8.2.1 (ii) |
|
70/4 |
Fountain Head
Properties Limited |
Amend Part 8 to
clearly provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out
within the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary
activity under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend Part 8.2.9 (ii)
as necessary |
|
70/5 |
Fountain Head
Properties Limited |
It is unclear
whether the sites with frontage to Broadway, Khyber Pass, Nuffield
Street and Remuera Road are required to provide parking if they have
secondary frontages e.g. Teed Street. |
|
70/6 |
Fountain Head
Properties Limited |
Adopt parts 1-5
of the plan modification as proposed |
|
71/1 (289KB) |
Wernham
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8 to
increase the maximum height control for business 3 zoned sites with
frontage onto Nuffield St, as set out in 8.2.1 (i), to 33m, and to
increase the maximum number of storeys to 10 |
|
71/2 |
Wernham
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8 to
delete the bonus height control as it relates to business 3 zoned sites
with frontages onto Nuffield St, as set out in 8.2.1 (ii) |
|
71/3 |
Wernham
Properties Limited |
Amend part 8 to
clearly provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out
within the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary
activity under Part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend part 8.2.9 (ii)
as necessary |
|
71/4 |
Wernham
Properties Limited |
Retain the
parking standards of part 12 of the Isthmus District Plan, 1999 |
|
71/5 |
Wernham
Properties Limited |
The parking
standard for offices, industry etc in the outer parking area should be
amended to read a "minimum of 1 space per 60m2 of gross floor
area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 of gross floor area" |
|
71/6 |
Wernham
Properties Limited |
Adopt parts 1-5
of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
72/1 (288KB) |
Ian W Gilles |
Amend part 8 to
increase the maximum height control for business 3 zoned sites, as set
out in 8.2.1 (i), to 33m, and to increase the maximum number of storeys
to 10 |
|
72/2 |
Ian W Gilles |
Amend part 8 to
delete the bonus height control as it relates to business 3 zoned sites,
as set out in 8.2.1 (ii) |
|
72/3 |
Ian W Gilles |
Amend part 8 to
clearly provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out
within the plan change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary
activity under part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend part 8.2.9 (ii)
as necessary |
|
72/4 |
Ian W Gilles |
The parking
standard for offices, industry etc in the outer parking area should be
amended to read a "minimum of 1 space per 60m2 of gross floor
area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 of gross floor area" |
|
72/5 |
Ian W Gilles |
Retain the
operative parking standards of part 12 of the Isthmus District Plan,
1999 |
|
72/6 |
Ian W Gilles |
Adopt parts 1-5
of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
73/1 (304KB) |
The Bagel
Property Company Limited |
Amend Part E -
'Amendment to Appendix B to the planning maps', with respect to the Core
Parking area so as to include the block bounded by Broadway, Mahuru
Street, Nuffield Street and Balm Street within the Core Parking Area. |
|
73/2 |
The Bagel
Property Company Limited |
Amend part 8 to
increase the maximum height control for business 3 zoned sites with
frontage onto Nuffield St, as set out in 8.2.1 (i), to 33m, and to
increase the maximum number of storeys to 10 |
|
73/3 |
The Bagel
Property Company Limited |
Amend part 8 to
delete the bonus height control as it relates to business 3 zoned sites
with frontages onto Nuffield St, as set out in 8.2.1 (ii) |
|
73/4 |
The Bagel
Property Company Limited |
Amend part 8 to
clarify that sites with frontage onto Broadway, Khyber Pass Road,
Nuffield Street or Remuera Road need not provide any parking within the
core parking areas. Amend 8.2.9 (i) first paragraph to reflect frontage
rather than access as the trigger for not requiring any on-site parking |
|
73/5 |
The Bagel
Property Company Limited |
To clearly
provide for reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within
the plan change as a restricted discretionary activity under part
12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend part 8.2.9 (ii) as necessary. |
|
73/6 |
The Bagel
Property Company Limited |
The parking
standard for offices, industry etc in the outer parking area should be
amended to read a "minimum of 1 space per 60m2 of gross floor
area and a maximum of 1 space per 40 m2 of gross floor area" |
|
74/1 (331KB) |
Transit New
Zealand |
- That ACC
engage in meaningful consultation with Transit over the zoning of its
landholdings
- That the
ACC acknowledge the potential for reverse sensitivity effects on Transit
in the Plan Modification
- That ACC
engage (at their own expense) a traffic engineer to assess in detail the
future development of the Newmarket area and how this will affect
traffic flows in and around the area - having particular regard to SH1
and its on/off ramps. This traffic engineer shall be engaged in
consultation with Transit specifically to ensure that; (a) Transit
approves of the person/organisation chosen; and (b) that Transit is
closely involved in briefing the traffic engineer.
- That the
ACC recognise that the replacement of the Newmarket Viaduct is imminent,
and that this will have a significant impact on the future land uses
immediately under and around the area
- That the
ACC consider extending the Framework area further to the south
- That the
ACC consider incorporating the open space area into the Plan Change
|
|
75/1 (428KB) |
Peter G Buchanan |
Withdraw plan
change 196 and require officers to work in partnership with the
community and other stakeholders so that a more satisfactory plan change
can be formulated. |
|
76/1 (41KB) |
Dilworth Trust
Board |
Oppose the
rezoning of 470 and 480 Broadway from business 4 to mixed use |
|
76/2 |
Dilworth Trust
Board |
Oppose the
inclusion of 470 and 480 Broadway in outer parking area |
|
76/3 |
Dilworth Trust
Board |
The parking
controls seem irreverent for the sites at 470 and 480 Broadway. |
|
76/4 |
Dilworth Trust
Board |
The plan change
will have a greater impact in terms of costs and controls on the smaller
site than the big sites i.e. 470 and 480 Broadway. |
|
77/1
(533KB) |
Samson
Corporation Limited and Sterling Nominees Limited |
That the
property at 27 Gillies Avenue is rezoned from residential 6b to the
mixed use zone |
|
77/2 |
Samson
Corporation Limited and Sterling Nominees Limited |
That the
property at 27 Gillies Avenue is included in the area proposed to be
subject to Annotation 62 and identified as D09-62 in Appendix A to the
planning maps (the Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan). |
|
77/3 |
Samson
Corporation Limited and Sterling Nominees Limited |
That Part 8.0
Development Controls of the proposed change be modified as follows::
- In the
table at rule 8.2.1 (i), add a new row at the bottom of the table,
stating:
|
Mixed
use sites with frontage to the western side of Gillies Avenue |
21 |
6 |
- In the
table at rule 8.2.1 (ii), add a new row at the bottom of the table,
stating:
|
Mixed
use sites with frontage to the western side of Gillies Avenue |
27 |
8 |
|
|
77/4 |
Samson
Corporation Limited and Sterling Nominees Limited |
That the
property at 27 Gillies Avenue is rezoned to business 3, with
corresponding amendments such as those set out as follows:
Part 8.0
Development Controls of the proposed change be modified as follows::
- In the
table at Rule 8.2.1 (i), add a new row at the bottom of the table,
stating:
|
Business
3 sites with frontage to the western side of Gillies Avenue |
21 |
6 |
- In the
table at Rule 8.2.1 (ii), add a new row at the bottom of the table,
stating
|
Business
3 sites with frontage to the western side of Gillies Avenue |
27 |
8 |
|
|
77/5 |
Samson
Corporation Limited and Sterling Nominees Limited |
Submitter
supports the inclusion of the properties south of 27 Gillies Avenue and
north of the Gillies Avenue off ramp in the mixed use zone or other
business zone. |
|
78/1 (35KB) |
Keryn and Brenda
Corrigan |
Accept the plan
change but opposes the rezoning of the land shown to be rezoned from
residential 7a to residential 8c and residential 7b to residential 8c
(particularly land block bordered by Remuera Road; Middleton Road;
Lauriston Avenue and Mamie Street as shown on map). |
|
79/1 (KB) |
Tony and Suzanne
Waldegrave |
Accept the plan
change but objects to that part of the plan to change the residential 6a
zoning to residential 8c for the land that is contained within the
streets bounded by Lauriston Avenue, Middleton Road and Mamie Street. |
|
80/1 (76KB) |
Fiona McCauley |
Oppose the
rezoning of the residential area bounded by Remuera Road, Middleton
Road, Mamie Street and Belmont Terrace (including Lauriston Avenue) from
residential 6a, residential 6b and residential 7c to residential 8c. |
|
80/2 |
Fiona McCauley |
Decline the plan
change in its entirety |
|
81/1 (219KB) |
Lawrence Bradley
and Joy Johns |
Object to
increasing the height allowance in mixed zone |
|
81/2 |
Lawrence Bradley
and Joy Johns |
Council should
reject modifications in Plan 196 |
|
82/1 (253KB) |
Anne Martin |
Oppose the
rezoning of parts of Newmarket area specifically Remuera Road, Middleton
Road, Lauriston Avenue, Mamie Street, Belmont Terrace to residential 8c. |
|
83/1 (KB) |
Luke Nine |
Oppose the
introduction of 8c zone between Sarawia Street to Cowie Street to Ayr
Street on Parnell Road |
|
83/2 |
Luke Nine |
Extend heritage
classification/protection to the area between Sarawia, Cowie and Ayr
Streets on Parnell Road |
|
83/3 |
Luke Nine |
Avoid high
density residential on main arterial roads |
|
84/1 (2569KB) |
Stephen Oxton
Family Trust |
That the
property on the corner of Carlton Gore Road and Park Road be included in
the plan change. |
|
84/2 |
Stephen Oxton
Family Trust |
The entire
corner of Park Road and Carlton Gore Road should be zoned multiple use. |
|
84/3 |
Stephen Oxton
Family Trust |
Supports
rezoning of 102 and 104 Park Road from residential 7c to residential 8c. |
|
85/1
(332KB) |
Broadway Park
Residents Society Incorporated |
Amend clause 6.2
so that the construction and/or relocation of new buildings and
accessory buildings be classified as a discretionary activity. |
|
85/2 |
Broadway Park
Residents Society Incorporated |
Amend part 8 to
reduce the maximum height limit on Lot 4 DP 156885 and Lot 5 DP 156885,
being the triangular site marking the intersection of the Newmarket rail
corridor with the Western rail corridor, from 27m, as noted under part
8.2.1 (i), to 15m |
|
85/3 |
Broadway Park
Residents Society Incorporated |
Amend part 8 to
delete the bonus height control, as set out in 8.2.1 (ii), as it relates
to Lot 4 DP 156885 and Lot 5 DP 156885 |
|
85/4 |
Broadway Park
Residents Society Incorporated |
Amend part 8 to
add a new development control that requires all new development of Lot 4
DP 156885 and Lot 5 DP 156885 to observe a 6 metre yard/buffer between
that site and adjoining residential zoned sites where no building or
activity, other than for rail purposes, may be permitted within this
area |
|
85/5 |
Broadway Park
Residents Society Incorporated |
With regard to
part 8.2.9 - Car Parking, we ask that where new parking, standards are
to be imposed that this be done in conjunction with a review of Council
policy relating to the overspill of car parking, from the Newmarket
commercial area into adjacent residential streets including a review of
current restrictions on roadside parking, and enforcement procedure |
|
85/6 |
Broadway Park
Residents Society Incorporated |
That Broadway
Park residents be directly involved in any future consultative process
to ensure involvement in future changes to the Newmarket area. |
|
85/7 |
Broadway Park
Residents Society Incorporated |
The introduction
of reduced parking standards is opposed |
|
85/8 |
Broadway Park
Residents Society Incorporated |
Adopt parts 1-5
of the plan modification as proposed. |
|
86/1 (75KB) |
Patricia McLean |
Oppose the
residential 8c proposals for the Mamie Street corner and the northern
side of Lauriston Avenue. |
|
87/1
(262KB) |
Seccombes Area
Residents and Ratepayers Association |
Oppose the plan
change in its entirety and require Auckland City Council to work with
the community to formulate a more satisfactory one. |
|
88/1 (31KB) |
Tom Keenan Trust |
100% in favour
of this proposed rezoning from residential 6a to 8c on 27 and 29
Middleton Road and also other properties on this side of the road. |
|
89/1 (1054KB) |
Tui Downie and
Lauriston Trust |
That the
rezoning of areas east of Middleton Road to residential 8c be deleted
e.g. the block bounded by Mamie Street, Middleton Road, Remuera Road and
Belmont Terrace and encompassing Lauriston Avenue. |
|
89/2 |
Tui Downie and
Lauriston Trust |
Supports
amendments proposed by the protection society. |
|
90/1 (116KB) |
Parly
Acquisitions Limited |
That the
business 3 zone be reinstated on the block of land defined by Khyber
Pass Road, Osbourne Street, Kent Street, York Street with the same
height and FAR property apply to other business 3 sites within
Newmarket. |
|
90/2 |
Parly
Acquisitions Limited |
If the mixed use
zone is to be retained on the block of land defined by Khyber Pass Road.
Osbourne Street, Kent Street, York Street and that the mixed use zone
provisions applying be amended as follows:
- Increase the mixed use FAR limits set out in clause 8.2.3 to provide a
basic FAR of 3.5:1 (from 3:1) and a maximum FAR of 5:1 (from 4:1)
- Increase the mixed use height limits set out in clause 8.2.1 to provide
a maximum height of 30m (subject to view protection controls within the
Operative District Plan).
- Amend
the bonus FAR limit for through site lanes set out in clause 8.2.3
from 2:1 to 3:1
- Amend
the street and lower level controls set out in clause 8.2.4 with respect
to building frontages abutting the street and/or public spaces.
Character/scheduled heritage buildings should be exempt from having to
comply with this rule. Similarly, the Verandah Controls set out in
clause 8.8.1.3 which are proposed to apply to the site should exempt
character/scheduled heritage buildings.
|
|
91/1 (73KB) |
Parly
Acquisitions Limited |
The submitter
seeks to amend the clause 8.2.9 to require no minimum car parking
requirement within the core parking area and reduced minima in the outer
area |
|
91/2 |
Parly
Acquisitions Limited |
The submitter
seeks that an additional control be added to clause 8.2.9 permitting
required carparks to be located off site within 400m of an activity to
which they relate as a permitted activity. |
|
91/3 |
Parly
Acquisitions Limited |
Include all of
the block of land defined by Khyber Pass, Osbourne Street, Kent Street
and York Street within core parking area |
|
91/4 |
Parly
Acquisitions Limited |
The submitter
supports the non-complying status of commercial carparking in clause 6.2
of the plan change. |
|
92/1 (884KB) |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
Decline the Plan
Modification in its present form. |
|
92/2 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that the objectives and policies of the plan modification be
adopted in so far as they recognise the importance of retail and
business enhancement and facilitate growth, as an integral element of
the Newmarket environment. |
|
92/3 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
proposes amendments to the objective and policy to provide an
appropriate framework for the increased scale and intensity in the
business 3 zone. In particular it is proposed that the objective and
policy 5.1 be replaced with the following (or words to a like effect):
5.1 To
achieve the residential growth outcomes sought for the Newmarket urban
living area in a manner that support the enhancement of the retail and
business functions of Newmarket.
-
By utilising
the residential 8 zone to increase the development potential of the
existing residential enclaves within Newmarket.
-
By
increasing the number of sites on which residential development can
occur within the town centre.
-
By
increasing scale and intensity of development provided for in the
mixed use zone and thereby increasing the opportunity for
residential development to occur.
-
By requiring
a high standard of amenity for occupants of new residential
developments.
-
By ensuring
that the site at 314-390 Khyber Pass Road includes sufficient
residential activity when it is redeveloped.
5.2
To achieve the retail and business activity growth and
development for the Newmarket commercial area
-
By
facilitating new development that will enhance the retail and
business functions of the town centre.
-
By
increasing scale and intensity of development provided for in the
Business 3 zones and thereby increasing the opportunity for retail
and business development to occur.
The following
objectives and policies should be renumbered accordingly. |
|
92/4 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that the western end of the 277 block be rezoned to business 3. |
|
92/5 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that Coventry Lane be zoned to business 3. |
|
92/6 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that the Hercules House be rezoned from residential 2a to business
3 zone and for map no.1 to be amended accordingly. |
|
92/7 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that the classification of a character building on the Mercury
Site on the eastern side of Nuffield Street be removed. |
|
92/8 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that assessment criteria 7.2.1(v) (a) be deleted or amended to not
be overly onerous or inflexible. |
|
92/9 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that the proposed retail frontage controls be amended on Mortimer
Pass, Morrow Street, and Nuffield Street, to the positions shown on the
plan supplied. |
|
92/10 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that the proposed verandah controls be amended on Mortimer Pass
and Morrow Street, to the positions shown on the plan supplied. |
|
92/11 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The verandah
controls should also enable no verandah to be required where vehicle
access is proposed for service vehicles or verandahs higher than 4 m to
allow trucks (etc) to pass beneath. |
|
92/12 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that clause 7.2.1(i) (g) be amended to state that:
- Where
reasonably practicable, the building is designed to be highly adaptable
to a variety of uses. For example, incorporating open structural
frames and more than minimum floor to ceiling heights
|
|
92/13 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that clause 7.2.1(iv) is deleted and replaced by the following:
- Corner Sites
The
extent to which the design of buildings on corner sites acknowledges the
special character of each particular corner location in a manner that
responds appropriately to both the context of the site and the form and
function of the building itself. The response may include a corner
element. |
|
92/14 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that clause 8.2.1(i) be deleted and the maximum height provisions
under the District Plan be reinstated, or alternatively the maximum
height proposed under the bonus provisions of 33m and 21m for the
business 3 and 4 zones respectively be provided for as a permitted
without any requirement for proposed setback. |
|
92/15 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that the maximum storey control in clause 8.2.1(i) be deleted. |
|
92/16 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that the permitted and bonus floor area ratios for the business 3
and mixed use zones under the plan modification be retained |
|
92/17 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that new definitions are added to Westfield's satisfaction to
clarify the meaning of "cycle and pedestrian ways" and "through site
lanes". |
|
92/18 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The thresholds
provisions in clause 8.7.1.1 should be deleted as they relate to
business 3 zoned land contained within the Newmarket Growth Area
Structure Plan |
|
92/19 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
Clause 8.2.3(i)
should be amended to provide that, for retail premises within the
business 3 zone in the Newmarket Growth Area, the formula:
Site area: 5,714
x 20,000 = threshold area for discretionary activity status
is applied to
calculate the threshold for discretionary activity status for retail
premises. |
|
92/20 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The threshold
provisions should be amended to reflect realistic development parameters
that are otherwise envisaged by the business 3 zone. |
|
92/21 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that clause 8.2.4(i) be amended to only apply to those sites that
are identified as being subject to a "retail frontage" control. |
|
92/22 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that clause 8.2.4(ii) be deleted. |
|
92/23 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that, if the core parking area is to extend over the 277 Block as
proposed by the plan modification, the map at Appendix B be amended to
clearly state that the core parking area extends 33.5, westward from the
property boundary on Broadway. |
|
92/24 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that the table in clause 8.2.9(ii) be amended to increase the
maximum on-site parking allowance for activities located on a ground
floor and activities not located on the ground floor to 1 space per 20m2
of GFA. Consequential amendments will be required to the rules under the
heading "Restricted discretionary activity" under clause 8.2.9(ii) as,
with the amendment proposed, restricted discretionary activity status
will no longer be required for a parking rate of 1 space per 20m2
of GFA for ground floor activities. |
|
92/25 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
The submitter
seeks that clause 8.2.9 (iii) be amended to:
- Permit a
maximum parking allowance of 1 space per 20m2 GFA for ground
floor activities
- Confirm
that retail falls under "other activities" in the table in relation to
above-ground general retail activities
- Add a
new rule in the table to reduce the minimum parking requirement for
cinemas that are integrated in comprehensive shopping centre
developments to 1 space per 15 seats.
|
|
92/26 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
That the
proposed provisions relating to the site at 314-390 Khyber Pass Road be
amended such that it is clear that an application for a comprehensive
development plan (as a discretionary activity) is required to include
activities that are consistent with those provided for by table 8.7.7.
Where such activities are not consistent, then an application for a
comprehensive development plan is otherwise classified as a non
complying activity. |
|
92/27 |
Westfield (New
Zealand) Limited |
That the
provisions at clause 9.6.1 be amended to include further assessment
criteria requiring consideration of the effects of the location and
intensity of nominated activities (as provided for by table 8.7.7), by
way of suitable cross referencing to clause 8.7.7.3. |
|
93/1 (687KB) |
Magenta
Investments Limited |
Rezone 1
Seccombes Road and 1 Gillies Avenue, to mixed use (map supplied) |
|
93/2 |
Magenta
Investments Limited |
Provisions
providing more compatible activity and development controls should be
provided for the sites at 1 Seccombes Road and 1 Gillies Avenue (map
supplied). |
94/1a (4121KB)
94/1b (4628KB) |
Mark A Sumich
Limited |
That the
proposed residential 8c zone be extended to the east along Remuera Road
so that it takes in the properties located at 74-80 Remuera Road |
|
95/1 (133KB) |
Judy McGaffin of
76 Limited |
That the
proposed residential 8c zone be extended to the east long Remuera Road
so that it takes in the properties located at 74-80 Remuera Road |
|
96/1 (137KB) |
James Horrocks |
That the
proposed residential 8c zone be extended to the east along Remuera Road
so that it takes in the properties located at 74-80 Remuera Road |
|
97/1 (104KB) |
Hayes Metal
Refineries and F Hayes and Company Limited |
Retain the
business 3 zoning where proposed to be rezoned mixed use as shown on
part A of the plan change. |
|
97/2 |
Hayes Metal
Refineries and F Hayes and Company Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
in relation to car parking and cycle storage to clearly provide for
reduction or waiver of the parking standards set out within the plan
change as a restricted discretionary or discretionary activity under
part 12.9.1.1 of the District Plan. Amend part 8.2.9 (iii) as necessary. |
|
97/3 |
Hayes Metal
Refineries and F Hayes and Company Limited |
To amend part
8.2.9 (iii) as it relates to required office/industry in the outer car
parking area to provide for a minimum of 1 space per 60m2 of
gross floor area and a maximum of 1 space per 40m2 gross
floor area. |
|
97/4 |
Hayes Metal
Refineries and F Hayes and Company Limited |
Amend part 8.2.9
to clarify that ground floor activities in the outer car parking area
require 1 space per 25 m2 gross floor area but can provide 1
space per 30 m2 where floor area is in excess of 500 mē and
80% of the parking is for visitors and customers. |
|
97/5 |
Hayes Metal
Refineries and F Hayes and Company Limited |
To provide for
the increased maximum height and maximum storeys within the business 3
and mixed use zones as set out under part 8.2.1 (ii) at the top of page
19 of the plan change, but to delete the bonus height controls with
respect to the 45 and 60 degree angle setbacks. |
|
98/1 (122KB) |
TIM Nominees
Limited |
'Permitted
activity' status should be introduced under certain circumstances for
minor works which can be specified such as those set out in the mixed
use zone for new additions i.e .no increase in the height of the
building etc. |
|
98/2 |
TIM Nominees
Limited |
The new
assessment criteria introduced under part 7.2.1 of the plan change could
be better articulated and illustrated in a design guideline for the
Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan and referenced rather than forming
specific assessment criteria. |
|
98/3 |
TIM Nominees
Limited |
Building
activity in table 8.7.1 should remain as a permitted activity subject to
certain criteria or be amended to a restricted controlled activity. |
|
99/1
(123KB) |
Melanesian
Mission Trust Board Limited |
'Permitted
activity' status should be introduced under certain circumstances for
minor works which can be specified such as those set out in the mixed
use zone for new additions i.e no increase in the height of the building
etc. |
|
99/2 |
Melanesian
Mission Trust Board Limited |
The new
assessment criteria introduced under part 7.2.1 of the plan change could
be better articulated and illustrated in a design guideline for the
Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan. |
|
99/3 |
Melanesian
Mission Trust Board Limited |
Building
activity in table 8.7.1 should remain as a permitted activity subject to
certain criteria or be amended to a restricted controlled activity. |
|
100/1 (258KB) |
Marlyn Whelan |
Oppose the
rezoning of residential areas from residential 6a, residential 7b,
residential 7c, to residential 8c on Belmont Terrace, Middleton Road,
Lauriston Avenue and Mamie Street. |
|
101/1 (346KB) |
Averil J Hellyer |
Oppose the plan
change in its entirety |
|
102/1
(340KB) |
Rohan and
Shanthi Ameratunga Family Trust |
Oppose the
increased height and density in the mixed use zone |
|
102/2 |
Rohan and
Shanthi Ameratunga Family Trust |
On Seccombes Rd, Auckland City Council should restrict traffic (where
possible) and long term parking to residents only |
|
102/3 |
Rohan and
Shanthi Ameratunga Family Trust |
Special
provision should be made to access Newmarket Primary School and to
ensure children's safety from vehicle traffic |
|
103/1 (343KB) |
Seccombes Family
Trust |
Oppose the
increased height and density in the mixed-use zone |
|
103/2 |
Seccombes Family
Trust |
On Seccombes Rd,
Auckland City Council should restrict traffic (where possible) and long
term parking to residents only |
|
103/3 |
Seccombes Family
Trust |
Special
provision should be made to access Newmarket Primary School and to
ensure children's safety from vehicle traffic. |
|
104/1 (376KB) |
Maya Ameratunga
Family Trust |
Oppose the
increased height and density in the mixed-use zone |
|
104/2 |
Maya Ameratunga
Family Trust |
On Seccombes Rd,
Auckland City Council should restrict traffic (where possible) and long
term parking to residents only. |
|
104/3 |
Maya Ameratunga
Family Trust |
Special
provision should be made to access Newmarket Primary School and to
ensure children's safety from vehicle traffic |
|
105/1 (1104KB) |
James E Redding |
Retain the
existing zoning in Mamie Street i.e. it remains residential 6a. |
|
106/1 (81KB) |
BA Trustees
Limited |
Amend the plan
change by inserting the words, "Where appropriate," before the
words "Green design principles" in clause 7.2.1, New buildings and
accessory buildings (including external additions and alterations, (i).
General, criterion m), Green design principles. |
|
107/1 (127KB) |
National
Property Trust |
The 1000m2
threshold as it applies to minimum carparking provision is increased
from 1000m2 to 3500m2. |
|
107/2 |
National
Property Trust |
That Council
includes in the plan change a bonus provision for providing a 'retail
through linkage' between two road frontages. |
|
108/1 (296KB) |
Smith and
Caughey Limited |
Amend the 'no
minimum' carparking provision so that the minimum 1000m2
threshold, as it applies to minimum carparking provision, is increased
from 1000m2 to 3500m2. |
|
108/2 |
Smith and
Caughey Limited |
That the open
space zoning and site use on and adjoining the site at 3 Teed Street is
reviewed with a more appropriate zoning applied in order to enable
adjoining site redevelopment and refocused use of the current open space
area and or alternatively appropriate rules and or statements
incorporated in the plan change in order to address the identified
impact on the Smith & Caughey's proposed redevelopment. |
|
108/3 |
Smith and
Caughey Limited |
Inclusion within
the assessment criteria provision for facade retention with the word
'building' broadened to include either partial retention or demolition
enabling site redevelopment |
|
108/4 |
Smith and
Caughey Limited |
Inclusion within
the bonus criteria for the provision of a covered retail linkage
connecting two road frontages. |
|
109/1 (45KB) |
Masfen Holdings
Limited |
Retain existing
business 3 provisions for commercial car parks as a controlled activity
in Newmarket. |
|
110/1 (252KB) |
Graeme and
Felicity Kidd |
Oppose the
residential 8c zoning of Middleton Road, Lauriston Avenue and Mamie
Street |
|
111/1 (KB) |
Richard C
Galloway |
Exclude the
properties on the west side of McColl Street and the south side of
Roxburgh Street from the plan change (map provided) so that the existing
regulations are retained. |
|
112/1
(156KB) |
Sylvia Park
Business Centre Limited |
That clause
8.2.9 of Plan Modification 196 be amended by removing the requirements
for maximum numbers of on-site car parks. |
|
113/2 (1123KB) |
Newmarket
Protection Society |
Opposes the
zoning changes from existing residential 6a and 7c to a more intensive
living zone named residential 8c, particularly in the Maime Street,
Lauriston Avenue and Remuera Road area. |
|
114/1 (554KB) |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
The plan change
be adopted subject to amendments relating to the protection Newmarket's
historic heritage. |
|
114/2 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
Provide a list
of addresses or a table making clear which buildings are character
buildings within the proposed structure plan. |
|
114/3 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
Provide an
explanation for the selection of character buildings and selection
criteria to guide the inclusion of additional character buildings in the
future. |
|
114/4 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
Identify all
proposed scheduled heritage buildings as character buildings in Part E:
Amendment to Appendix B to the planning maps - D09-62 Newmarket Growth
Area Structure Plan Diagram. |
|
114/5 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
That the
buildings in the following list are identified as character buildings in
Part E: Amendment to Appendix B to the planning maps - D09-62 Newmarket
Growth Area Structure Plan Diagram:
- Olympic Pool, Broadway (category A);
- Tudor Court, 73b Carlton Gore Road (category A);
- Khyber House, 477 Khyber Pass Road (category A);
- Newmarket Railway Station (category A);
- Newmarket Railway Signal box (category A);
- House, 71 Carlton Gore Road (category B);
- Carlton Flats, 73c Carlton Gore Road (category B);
- Former CCG Industries Building, 33 Crowhurst Street (category B);
- Daytone House, 53 Davis Crescent (category B);
- Officers' Club of New Zealand, 15 Edgerley Street (category B);
- 29
George Street (category B);
- 31
George Street (category B);
- Redpaths, corner Gillies Avenue and Morrow Street (category B);
- Former Occasions (now Lone Star, corner Kent Street and York Street
(category B);
- House, 22 Morgan Street (category B);
- Dominion Motors (former Levenes), Mortimer Pass (category B);
- Sunola, 2 Railway Street (category B);
- Building (former Quality Mens & Ladies Clothing), corner Short Street
and Davis Crescent (category B);
- Ryecroft, 2 Sarawia Street (category B): and
- Hayes Building, Teed Street (category B).
|
|
114/6 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
Identify the
following as 'cultural heritage items' on Part E: Amendment to Appendix
B to the planning maps - D09-762 Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan
Diagram:
- War memorial, corner of Broadway and Davis Crescent (category A);
- Captain Cook statues, Khyber Pass Road (category A);
- Sculpture, Lumsden Park (category A); and
- Cannon, Lumsden Park (category A).
|
|
114/7 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
Amend the
following parts of the structure plan text to:
- 5.3 Resource Management Objectives and polices: amended first bullet
point to read as follows: By encouraging the retention of the character
buildings and cultural heritage items within Newmarket;
- 6.2 Business 3 and Mixed Use Zones: amend proposed activities table as
follows: Demolition or removal of a character building or cultural
heritage item
- 7.2.2 Assessment Criteria: Character buildings: retitle as follows:
Character Buildings and Cultural Heritage Items.
- 7.2.2 Assessment Criteria: Character Buildings: introduce new criterion
as follows: (iii) Cultural heritage items. The extent to which: a) the
cultural heritage item derives its cultural heritage values from its
current location; b) the extent to which the cultural heritage item
contributes to the character of the streetscape or public place in its
current location; c) the new location for the cultural heritage item
will remedy or mitigate its removal from its current location.
- 9.0 Comprehensive Development - 314-390 Khyber Pass Road: introduce
additional requirements for the assessment criteria for comprehensive
development plans and development controls similar to those sought
immediately above to ensure that the Captain Cook statue is retained in
an appropriate location.
|
|
114/8 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
The buildings
listed below are assessed by the Council and considered for inclusion as
character buildings within Part E: Amendment to Appendix B to the
planning maps - D09-62 Newmarket Growth Area Structure Plan Diagram;
- Houses, Cowie Street;
- 3
shops, 10 - 12 Broadway;
- Newmarket Police Station, corner Middleton Road and Remuera Road;
- Police House adjacent in Middleton Road;
- House, 62 Remuera Road;
- 2
and 4 Teed Street;
- 366-370 Broadway;
- Newmarket Working Men's Club, 3 Crowhurst Street;
- Centrepoint Fabrics, 26 Morrow Street (also fronts onto Eden Street);
- Morgan Street Gallery, 9 Morgan Street;
- Former AEPB Workshop and Garage, Nuffield Street; and
- 33
George Street
|
|
114/9 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
The Lion Brewery
site be assessed for any surviving buildings, structures or features of
heritage or character interest, given the site's local and national
significance. |
|
114/10 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
If any heritage
buildings, structures or features are identified on the Lion Brewery
site, that these be included as character buildings in Part E: Amendment
to Appendix B to the planning maps - D09-62 Newmarket Growth Area
Structure Plan Diagram or in the heritage schedule. |
|
114/11 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
Amend the
assessment criteria for character buildings (7.2.2) and for
comprehensive development plans and development controls in 9.0
Comprehensive Development - 314-390 Khyber Pass Road so as to ensure the
appropriate protection of any heritage buildings, structures or
features. |
|
114/12 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
An
archaeological assessment is carried out for the proposed plan change
area to identify those properties with high archaeological potential. |
|
114/13 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
Any properties
with high archaeological potential should be identified in part E:
Amendment to Appendix B to the planning maps - D09-62 Newmarket Growth
Area Structure Plan Diagram. |
|
114/14 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
A new assessment
criterion should be introduced into 7.2.1 (i) General and as follows:
the proposal avoids, remedies or mitigates adverse effects on
archaeological resources in accordance with the recommendations of an
archaeological assessment. |
|
114/15 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
Consultation
with tangata whenua be undertaken to identify if any sites of
significance to Maori are within the proposed plan change area. |
|
114/16 |
New Zealand
Historic Places Trust |
Any sites of
significance to Maori should be appropriately marked within the District
Plan (perhaps scheduled) and appropriate mechanisms provided to ensure
their cultural heritage values are protected. |
|
115/1 (96KB) |
BA Trustees
Limited |
Amend the plan
change by clarifying clause 7.2.1, new buildings and accessory buildings
(including external additions and alteration (i) General criterion h)
and its relationship with clause 8.1 residential 8 zone , 8.0
development controls and the inter relationship with clause 7.8.2
development controls, rules for residential 8a, 8b and 8c zones of the
Isthmus District Plan. |
|
116/1 (25KB) |
The Strand Trust |
Accept the plan
change, particularly the identification of a car parking area and the
associated parking ratios. |
|
117/1 (101KB) |
BA Trustees
Limited |
Amend the plan
change by having no front yard rule to meet assessment criterion b), (i)
General , 7.2.1, new buildings and accessory buildings (including
external additions and alterations) ; to recognise the physical and
neighbourhood characteristics of these sites, the locality, aspect,
orientation, the site sizes, width and depth, the topography etc of this
particular part of Newmarket. |