| Sub No (click to view copy of submission) |
Name |
Decision Requested |
| 1/1 (631kb PDF) |
Simon Brown |
Decline the requested plan
change on the grounds of actual and/or potential adverse effects on the
activities of the residents in the area and people who travel through it.
|
|
2/1 (279kb PDF) |
Southern Cross Hospital |
Decline the plan
modification. |
| 3/1 (652kb PDF) |
Charles S Goldie |
Decline the requested plan
change on the grounds of actual and/or potential adverse effects on the
activities of the residents in the area, the motoring public and emergency
services. |
|
4/1
(2781kb PDF) |
General Trust Board of the Diocese of Auckland |
Decline the plan change. |
|
5/1
(2420kb PDF) |
The St Mark's Remuera Parochial Trust Board |
|
6/1
(2429kb PDF) |
Nicola Christie and Emma Lamb, the wardens of the
Anglican parish of St Marks |
|
4/2
(2781kb PDF) |
General Trust Board of the Diocese of Auckland |
Or in the alternative,
amend the plan change in such a way as to take into account of and give
effect to the following concerns:- The Plan Change does not
meet the Residential 8 zone objectives, policies and strategy including its
application to parcels of land with an area of one hectare or more. The
subject site measures 2,831mZ, not the 10,OOOmZ required by the District
Plan
The site at 83 Remuera
Road does not lie within a specified growth area and therefore is not
suitable for further intensification by way of Residential 8c zoning.
If the subject site were
to be identified with a Residential 8c zoning, it would be an 'island'
within a larger area of Residential 7b and Mixed Use zones.
The area covered by the
Structure Plan (Plan Change 196) included 83 Remuera Rd, but did not
identify the site as one that was suitable for inclusion within the
specified growth area.
The Plan Change will
remove the ability for adjacent landowners to participate in the
decision-making process regarding the future development of the site.
The Plan Change will
generate more than minor potential and actual adverse effects on the
environment including heritage, visual, shadowing, dominance, amenity,
privacy, landform, vegetation and traffic.
|
|
5/2
(2420kb PDF) |
The St Mark's Remuera Parochial Trust Board |
|
6/2
(2429kb PDF) |
Nicola Christie and Emma Lamb, the wardens of the
Anglican parish of St Marks |
| 7/1
(1963kb PDF) |
Auckland Regional Council |
Amend Proposed Private
Plan Change 250 to include a maximum building height that is aligned with
the above ground heights as set out in the planning maps of Change 8 to the
Auckland Regional Policy Statement, |
| 7/2
(1963kb PDF) |
Auckland Regional Council |
Or refuse Proposed Private
Plan Change 250 and retain the existing zone. |
| 8/1 (2898kb PDF) |
Drs T Rich, A J Hunter and C Sharp |
Decline the plan change in
its entirety. |
|
9/1 (961kb
PDF) |
New Zealand Historic Place Trust Pouhere Taonga |
That council request, by
way of Section 92 of the RMA, further information about the proposal's
potential adverse effects on the heritage and amenity value of St Mark's
Anglican Church. This information should seek to address the points raised
... about ways in which the proposed plan change may affect St Mark's
Church.
- Potential visual impact
of a full height development in the Residential 8c zone on the church.
- Potential for shading
of the church by the site if it is fully developed to Residential 8c height
and density.
- Potential for
earthworks within the site having adverse effects upon the church.
- Potential for a large
development in the Residential 8c zone to block views of the Church from a
variety of locations, thereby undermining its landmark status in the
surrounding area.
|
|
9/2 (961kb
PDF) |
New Zealand Historic Place Trust Pouhere Taonga |
That council advise the
applicant about the possibility of there being archaeological sites related
to the church within the vicinity of the subject site. Further consultation
with the NZHPT is advised, and it may be necessary for the applicant to
apply for an authority to modify, damage or destroy an archaeological site
under the Historic Places Act 1993.
|
| 10/1
(923kb PDF) |
Westfield (New Zealand) Limited |
That the plan change be
amended to address Westfield's concerns that in its present form the Plan
Change:-
- will not promote sustainable management of resources
- is contrary to Part 2 of the RMA
- will not met the reasonably foreseeable needs of future generations
- will not enable social, economic and cultural well being of the
people of Auckland City
- is contrary to the purposes and provisions of the Act and other
relevant planning documents
- is inappropriate and inconsistent with the purpose and principles
of the Act
- does not address the introduction of a height in relation to
boundary control onto adjacent sites under the proposed Residential 8c
zoning which does not currently apply under the Residential 7b zoning:
- will adversely impact upon adjacent land due to the introduction of
new height in relation to boundary controls;
- does not address the reverse sensitivity implications of the
increased development provided for by the new zone on the allowable
development of adjacent land uses; and
- will adversely impact upon the future development potential of
adjacent land.
|
| 10/2
(923kb PDF) |
Westfield (New Zealand) Limited |
Alternatively, if the
relief sought in 10/1 above is not accepted, that the Plan Change be
declined.
|
| 11/1 (259kb PDF) |
M Booth |
No decision requested. |
