Auckland Council website.
This website has changed
This is the former Auckland City Council website, which has some of the information and services you need if you live or do business in the area. Go to the main Auckland Council website to access the complete range of council services.
Skip navigation
Council member and meetings
Maungakiekie Community Board
Back to contents AGENDA ATTACHMENTS

OPEN AGENDA

 I hereby give notice that a meeting of the

MAUNGAKIEKIE COMMUNITY BOARD

will be held as follows:

DATE: Thursday, 18 September 2008
TIME: 6:00 pm
VENUE: Onehunga Community Centre
  83 Church Street
  Onehunga
Eric Perry
DEMOCRACY ADVISOR

Members:

Ms Bridget Graham [Chairperson]
Mr Brett Clark [Deputy Chairperson]
Ms Olga Brochner
Ms Lynn Messervy
Mr Simon Randall
Cr Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga
Cr Richard Northey, ONZM

  1. Top APOLOGIES

    At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

  2. Top CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

    The minutes of the Maungakiekie Community Board meeting held on Thursday 21 August 2008 to be confirmed as a true and correct record.

  3. Top EXTRAORDINARY BUSINESS

    Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
    "An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
    (a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
    (b) The presiding member explains at the meeting at a time when it is open to the public,-
      (i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
      (ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting."
    Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
    "Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
    (a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
      (i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
      (ii) The presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
    (b) no resolution, decision, or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion."
  4. Top PUBLIC FORUM

    A period of time (approximately 20 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 5 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.

    The following requests have been received to address the meeting:

    4.1. ELLERSLIE SANTA PARADE AND STREET PARTY - CHRISTINE FOLEY, ELLERSLIE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION

    Christine Foley, representing the Ellerslie Business Association and the Ellerslie Community Arts Trust, will be in attendance to address the Board in support of her Local Event Funding application for costs associated with the Ellerslie Santa Parade and Street Party. This application will be considered under item 10.1 on this agenda.

    4.2. PUBLIC SAFETY AND POLICING ISSUES ON ONE TREE HILL - MICHAEL AYRTON, SENIOR SERGEANT WENDY SPILLER AND GORDON CAMPBELL

    Michael Ayrton, Director, Cornwall Park Trust Board, Senior Sergeant Wendy Spiller, Newmarket Police, and Gordon Campbell, Community Constable, Epsom Police, will be in attendance to address the Board regarding public safety and policing issues on the summit of One Tree Hill. A report on this issue will also be discussed under item 5 on this agenda.

  5. Top CCTV AND STRENGTHENED POLICING OPTION - SUMMIT OF ONE TREE HILL

    Tony Hartnett  
    Parks Adviser, Volcanic Landscapes 9 September 2008

    Tony Hartnett, Parks Adviser, Volcanic Landscapes, will be in attendance to speak to this item.

    Reporting on investigations that have been carried out to find a long-term solution to the problem of antisocial behaviour at the summit of One Tree Hill at night. Officers have considered the use of CCTV cameras at the summit, used as a tool to assist the police to make their patrol car response more effective. It was also necessary to do further investigation into the use of a gate as a potential solution, located at the road junction in front of the Sorrento function centre. The long-term strategy suggested by the Board at its 17 July 2008 meeting is referred to as Option A. In investigating this option, information has been collected from the police, an expert in the use of CCTV and monitoring, and the residents of two local houses closest to the bottom of the summit road. It is likely that the technical demands of having cameras at the summit can be overcome, however there is likely to be ongoing damage to the cameras, which will cost significant money to repair. The report from the police on the workability of the CCTV-based proposal explains why the use of this technology on the summit would not change their response time, as they would not give any higher priority to calls for the summit than at present.

    The capital cost of setting up all of the equipment would be approximately $66,000, and operating costs would be more than $28,000 per year. The total costs of the CCTV based system are much higher than options which use a gate to close the summit, while the benefits to the public of keeping the summit open throughout the night are negligible. The advice received clearly indicates that the CCTV-based option will not solve the problem, because it will not guarantee any increase in the capability of the police to respond to calls for the summit.  An alternative to the CCTV option, referred to as Option B, has two gates located at the Sorrento junction with a few strategically placed bollards. One of the gates would have an electronic operating device to allow residents on the west side of the domain to access their houses at night. The advantages of Option B would be:

    • the summit, the western car park and the section of road east of Sorrento would no longer be available for antisocial behaviour;
    • the antisocial people and their cars would have to turn around at the Sorrento junction, so that they would only have access to the lower part of the domain; and
    • the two resident families could continue to use the road at night.

    Recommending that the Board recommends to the Arts, Culture and Recreation Committee that approval be given to closing the summit of One Tree Hill at night between 11:00pm and 7:00am in order to stop the increasing level of antisocial behaviour; and that when required for public holidays and events, the summit road opening time be extended and publicly notified.

    [ATTACHMENT 5]  
  6. Top COMMUNITY BOARD LOCAL FUNDING 2008

    Brenda Massey  
    Programme Adviser - Funding 2 September 2008

    Graeme Dykes, Community Services Adviser, will be in attendance to speak to this item.

    Reporting on the allocation of grants from the 2008 Community Board Local Fund. The two eligibility criteria that guide the allocation of these grants are:

    • A group's membership and/or application must benefit no more than two community board areas, and
    • Applications must support the processes and activities that enable people to get together and work to improve their communities.

    The Community Board Local Fund has a budget of $259,800. Of this, the Maungakiekie Community Board has $25,000 to allocate to community groups operating in its area. Twenty-seven applications were made to the Maungakiekie Community Board from 26 groups requesting $50,527.65. A meeting was held on 26 August with the community board spokespersons who have recommended allocations totalling $25,000.

    Recommending that the recommendations for grants totalling $25,000 from the Community Board Local Fund 2008, as in Appendix One, be approved.

    [ATTACHMENT 6]  
  7. Top GREAT SOUTH ROAD CYCLING IMPROVEMENTS

    Daniel Newcombe  
    Senior Transport Planner 10 September 2008

    Daniel Newcombe, Senior Transport Planner, will be in attendance to speak to this item.

    Reporting on the final component of the Ellerslie Walking and Cycling Area Plan, in which council has developed designs for a short section of cycle lanes along Great South Road between Marei Street and Main Highway. The proposed cycle lanes will provide a safe space for cyclists on Great South Road and form part of the regional cycle network, linking to other walking and cycling initiatives in the surrounding area. As there is sufficient road width in the area, it is proposed to build cycle lanes next to existing parking lanes. There will be no changes to existing on-street parking or traffic capacity.

    Public consultation was undertaken in March/April this year and only six responses were received from the approximately 200 letters delivered to residents and businesses adjacent to the proposed route. The six responses raised only minor issues which have been accommodated into the revised design. There were no issues raised around parking removal, as has been the case with previous cycle lane projects. The designs are budgeted for within the Plan's current programme and would be implemented once the contractors have completed the already approved components elsewhere in Ellerslie. As the proposed cycle lanes do not affect traffic or parking and only minor issues have been raised through public consultation, it is recommended that the Board endorse the plans as the last component of the Ellerslie Walking and Cycling Area Plan.

    Recommending that the Board endorse the implementation of the proposed Great South Road cycle lanes between Marei Street and Main Highway as the final component of the Ellerslie Walking and Cycling Area Plan.

    [ATTACHMENT 7]  
  8. Top DOG ACCESS TO BEACHES

    Colin Craig  
    Senior Planner 4 September 2008

    Reporting on the review of off-leash dog exercise areas begun by council in September 2007. On 28 February 2008, council adopted a draft dogs policy and draft dog control bylaw for consultation under the Local Government Act 2002. These documents were publicly advertised on 31 March 2008 and submissions closed on 2 May 2008. A total of 266 submissions were received and the hearing of verbal submissions by the hearings panel occurred over three days in late May and early June. No changes to the provisions regarding beach access were proposed when the draft bylaw and policy were advertised. However, a number of dog owners suggested in submissions that council should adopt more liberal provisions for dog access. Approximately 5% of submitters wanted stricter dog controls in public places.

    As a result of submissions and deliberations, the hearings panel would like all community boards to indicate whether or not they believe:

    • there are any beaches within their area that should be available at some time during the day during the summer period for off-leash exercise, and/or
    • there should be a specific dog beach/beaches on the isthmus available for dogs all the time.

    The hearings panel would also like to hear of any other issues the boards may have concerning dogs on beaches. The recommendations of the community boards will not be able to be given effect without further public consultation because of the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 and the Dog Control Act 1996. Once the panel has heard from the community boards on this matter it will be making a recommendation to Council on this matter and the timing of any further consultation required.

    Recommending that the Board make a recommendation to the dog policy and dog control bylaw hearings panel by 30 September 2008, as to whether or not there are any beaches within their area that should be available at some time during the day during the summer period for off-leash exercise, and/or there should be a specific dog beach/beaches on the isthmus available for dogs all the time, or if there are any other issues the Board may have concerning dogs on beaches.

    [ATTACHMENT 8]  
  9. Top DISCRETIONARY FUNDING APPLICATIONS

    Discretionary Funding applications should comply with the following criteria:

    • projects should directly benefit the local community;
    • funds granted should generally be used to 'top up' funds already gathered; and
    • applications must include full details of the project and budget.

    Applications for retrospective costs will not be considered.

    9.1. NANDAN (AN INDIAN BENGALI ASSOCIATION)

    Eric Perry  
    Democracy Advisor 9 September 2008

    Attaching for the Board's consideration an application for a Discretionary Funding grant from Nandan (an Indian Bengali Association), seeking funding of $300 for costs associated with the purchase of lights and props for a three-day "Festival of Lights" event.

    Recommending that the Board consider the application.

    [ATTACHMENT 9.1]  
  10. Top LOCAL EVENTS FUNDING APPLICATIONS

    Local Event Funding applications should comply with the following criteria:

    • the funding must be used for running an actual event;
    • the event must be free (have no cover charge in any form);
    • the event must be held in a public place (e.g. park, beach, etc);
    • the event must be open to anyone who wishes to attend and not restricted to particular sectors of the community;
    • the event must not be solely for commercial gain or fundraising purposes (e.g. must have a significant 'free event' component);
    • applications for event funding must not be retrospective at the point of decision making (e.g. the event has already been held and funding would be a reimbursement); and
    • the event must be local in nature and can receive funding from no more than two community boards.

    10.1. ELLERSLIE COMMUNITY ARTS TRUST - ELLERSLIE SANTA PARADE AND STREET PARTY

    Eric Perry  
    Democracy Advisor 9 September 2008

    Attaching for the Board's consideration an application for a Local Events Funding grant from the Ellerslie Community Arts Trust, seeking funding of $4,000 for cost associated with the annual Ellerslie Santa Parade and Street Party.

    Recommending that the Board consider the application.

    [ATTACHMENT 10.1]  
  11. Top CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT

    Attaching for the Board's information a report from the Chairperson outlining the projects and issues she has been involved with since the August meeting.

    Recommending that the report from the Chairperson be received.

    [ATTACHMENT 11]  
  12. Top BOARD MEMBERS' REPORTS

    12.1. REPORT FROM BRETT CLARK

    Board member Clark will table a written report at the meeting.

    Recommending that the verbal report of Board member Clark be received.

    12.2. REPORT FROM OLGA BROCHNER

    Board member Brochner will provide a verbal report at the meeting.

    Recommending that the verbal report of Board member Brochner be received.

    12.3. REPORT FROM LYNN MESSERVY

    Board member Messervy will provide a verbal report at the meeting.

    Recommending that the verbal report of Board member Messervy be received.

    12.4. REPORT FROM SIMON RANDALL

    Board member Randall will provide a verbal report at the meeting.

    Recommending that the verbal report of Board member Randall be received.

  13. Top COUNCILLORS' REPORTS

    13.1. REPORT FROM COUNCILLOR NORTHEY

    Attaching for the Board's information a report from Councillor Northey outlining the projects and issues he has been involved with since the August meeting.

    Recommending that the report from Councillor Northey be received.

    [ATTACHMENT 13.1]  

    13.2. REPORT FROM COUNCILLOR LOTU-IIGA

    Councillor Lotu-Iiga will provide a verbal report at the meeting.

    Recommending that the verbal report from Councillor Lotu-Iiga be received.

    13.3. REPORT FROM COUNCILLOR BOYLE

    Councillor Boyle will provide a verbal report at the meeting.

    Recommending that the verbal report from Councillor Boyle be received.

    13.4. REPORT FROM COUNCILLOR CHRISTIAN

    Councillor Christian will provide a verbal report at the meeting.

    Recommending that the verbal report from Councillor Christian be received.

  14. Top REPORTS REQUESTED/PENDING

    Eric Perry  
    Democracy Advisor 9 September 2008

    Attaching the reports requested/pending list of the Democracy Advisor, dated 9 September 2008.

    Recommending that the report be received.

    [ATTACHMENT 14]  
  15. Top GROUP ACTIVITY REPORTS

    Eric Perry  
    Democracy Advisor 9 September 2008

    Attaching activity reports and statistics from the various groups within Auckland City Council for the month of August for the Board's information.

    Recommending that the Group Activity Reports for the month of August 2008 be received.

    [ATTACHMENT 15]