|
|
|
Council member and meetings
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
FINANCE AND STRATEGY COMMITTEE
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, 15 APRIL
2009 AT 9.30AM
IN THE COMMITTEE ROOM,
LEVEL 15
CIVIC ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING
1 GREYS AVENUE
AUCKLAND
| PRESENT: |
Councillors: |
Douglas |
Armstrong, QSO |
[Chairperson]
[until 11:53am, item C1; from 11:54am,
item C2] |
| |
|
Paul |
Goldsmith |
[Deputy Chairperson] |
| |
|
Aaron |
Bhatnagar |
[until 10:40am, item 10] |
| |
|
Dr Cathy |
Casey |
|
| |
|
Mark |
Donnelly |
|
| |
Deputy Mayor |
David |
Hay |
[from 9:48am, item 8; until 11:22am, item
13] |
| |
|
Peseta Sam |
Lotu-Iiga |
|
| |
|
Richard |
Northey, ONZM |
|
| ALSO PRESENT: |
|
Bill |
Christian |
|
| |
|
Graeme |
Easte |
[until 11:05am, item 12; from 11:16am,
item 12; until 11:22am, item 13] |
APOLOGIES
There were no apologies.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
That the minutes of the
Finance and Strategy Committee meeting held on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 be
confirmed as a true and correct record.
CARRIED
EXTRAORDINARY BUSINESS
There was no extraordinary business.
PUBLIC FORUM
There were no requests to speak in public forum.
REPORTS REQUESTED/PENDING
That the reports requested/pending of the Democracy Advisor, dated 7 April 2009,
be received, noting the following changes:
| 1 |
15 February 2007
- Item C7 |
TBA |
Business Advisory Manager, Treasury |
Governance options for the Zoo |
This item was withdrawn pending the outcome of the Royal Commission on
Auckland Governance's decision. If a change in Zoo governance is
warranted following the Commission's announcement a report will be
prepared for the committee's consideration. At 10 December 2008 Finance
and Strategy Committee meeting, change in status - report recommended to
Council by the Remuneration Working Party to be presented to the Finance
and Strategy Committee September 2009 meeting.
Confidential item - Officers report back on governance options for the
Auckland Zoo including a preferred option. FSC agreed to defer item
until September 2009 awaiting Royal Commission outcomes.
15 April 2009 Finance and Strategy Committee agreed to change from
Sept 2009 to TBA. |
| 2 |
15 October 2008 -
Item 7D |
from Apr-09 to
May 2009 |
Treasury Manager |
Metrowater -
Unaccounted Water Targets |
That Metrowater
investigate the viability of amending the unaccounted for water targets
to 12.7% in 2009-2010 and to 12.0% in 2010-2011 or to appropriate
volumetric targets as suggested by last month's Finance & Strategy
Committee meeting and report back to the Committee.
To be reported at next stage of Metrowater SOI in March 2009.
Deferred to May due to CCOs requiring more time to respond. |
| 6 |
18 March 2009 -
Item 8C |
from April
to
May 2009 |
Corporate
Financial Analyst |
Trusts and
Reserves |
Officers to
report on on the nature of the trusts, the criteria used for returns,
the terms of the statutory reserves, how council can wrap up the trusts
to start the Auckland City Charitable Trust for improvements in the city
with a sitting Board of Trustees and how council can better administer
the trusts and special reserves by using the funding for enhancements
(ie to the Winstone park) rather than on maintenance. Deferred to may due to more time required for investigation. |
| 7 |
25 March 2009 -
Item C1 |
from 29-Apr
to
May 2009
&Aug 09 |
Treasury Advisor |
Review of THE
EDGE®'s Performance for The Half-year Ending 31 December 2008 |
The Edge Board is
to present to the 29 April 2009 Committee meeting outlining the steps
they are taking to minimise losses for this financial year.
Deferred to May due to CCOs requiring more time to respond.
Officers to report to August 2009 FSC meeting on the Ticketing Service
performance as at 30 June 2009. |
| 8 |
25 March 2009 -
Item C2 |
from 29-Apr to
May 2009 |
Policy Analyst,
Treasury |
Proposal to
Provide THE EDGE®With Working Capital Funding |
THE EDGE®to
report back to the 29 April 2009 Committee meeting with an assessment on
the adequacy of their risk criteria.
Deferred to May due to CCOs requiring more time to respond. |
| 9 |
25 March 2009 -
Item C3 |
from 29-Apr to
June 2009 |
Treasury Advisor |
Review of the
Parking Advisory Board's Performance for The Second Quarter 2008/2009 |
The Parking
Advisory Board is to report back to the 29 April 2009 Committee on their
strategy to minimise any shortfalls.
Officers to report to the May meetings of the Finance and Strategy and
Transport Committees on options for compensating any loss of parking and
enforcement revenues during construction projects.
Deferred to June as will form part of the Parking Group's 3rd quarter
report. |
CARRIED
DELEGATED DECISIONS OF THE GROUP MANAGER PROPERTY AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT MANAGER
That the
decisions made under the Group Manager Property and Property Management
Manager's delegation be noted.
CARRIED
WORKING PARTY RECOMMENDATION ON COUNCILLOR CASEY'S NOTICE OF MOTION ON THE USE OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES BY COUNCILLORS AT COMMITTEE MEETINGS
That the recommended guidelines from the Electronic Devices Working Party, as
listed below, be adopted:
- That there is an overarching principle that Chairs of
committees should remind the councillors at the meeting (not just voting
councillors, but all in attendance) plus the audience that they should be
"electronically" polite, and switch cellphones and laptops onto silent mode, and
that councillors who need to make phone calls or clear voice messages, or engage
in lengthy emails should leave the room and do so, and then return to the
meeting.
- That during committee public forums and deputations that
councillors should refrain from any texting, voice message clearing, answering
their phones, emailing or typing on laptops. If they do not wish to listen to
the member of the public or the deputation, they should leave the room. Laptops
should only be used during public forum/deputations if it directly relates to
note taking/research during public forum. This is equally applicable to other
activities such as reading the newspaper or similar during public forums.
- That the use of electronic communications during committee
meetings after public forums is acceptable but should be kept to a minimum when
for non-council activity. Using a laptop when relevant to the debate, eg for
research or note taking, is acceptable.
- That there is no desire to alter standing orders, but
council Chairs should be encouraged to commence each meeting with a reminder for
councillors, officers and the audience to turn devices onto silent, to ensure
standards of politeness for public forum, and to encourage people to leave the
room if they need to engage in phone calls or lengthy emails/typing.
- That the recommended guidelines above be circulated to all
Councillors, and Committee and Community Board Chairs to enact, as meeting
guidelines.
CARRIED
SUBMISSION TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION ON THE PROPOSAL TO TRANSFER THE HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS (EXCLUDING RANGITOTO AND BROWNS ISLAND) FROM AUCKLAND CITY AND AUCKLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL (ARC) TO THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT
COUNCIL (TCDC) AND ENVIRONMENT WAIKATO
- That the Finance
and Strategy Committee approves the submission that strongly recommends that the
proposal to the Local Government Commission, which seeks that the proposal to
transfer the Hauraki Gulf Islands (excluding Rangitoto and Browns Islands) from
Auckland City Council and Auckland Regional Council to Thames-Coromandel
District Council and Environment Waikato, does not proceed; and further noting
that the Royal Commission report, which has subsequently been approved by
Government, was in favour of the Hauraki Gulf Islands remaining as part of
Auckland City.
- That the Finance
and Strategy Committee delegates to the Chief Executive to appear at the hearing
on behalf of Auckland City Council.
CARRIED
AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL SELECT COMMITTEE SUBMISSION ON FRANKLIN DISTRICT COUNCIL (CONTRIBUTIONS TO MUSEUMS) AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- That the Finance and Strategy Committee
approves Auckland City Council making a submission to the Local Government and
Environment Committee on the matter of the Franklin District Council
(Contributions to Museums) Amendment Bill 2008.
- That Finance and Strategy Committee notes that
in preparing the submission, officers take particular note of the following
matters:
- That all Auckland City citizens should contribute to Auckland City
amenities such as the museum; and
- That Auckland City Council wishes to be heard before the Select
Committee;
- That an effect of the Bill will be to reduce the maximum levy
calculation under the Auckland War Memorial Museum Act 1996 and the Museum of
Transport and Technology Act 2000;
- That the proportion of levy payable by the remaining six councils
will increase across the board, while Franklin District reduces;
- That the first levy that the legislation would be applicable to would
be those payable for the 2011/12 financial year, so the change would come into
effect on the same date as the other effects of the reorganisation of local
government; and
- That the issue of
boundaries defining that part of the region that is to be subject to the levies
should be addressed through separate legislation arising from the current review
of regional governance, which is planned to be passed this calendar year and
will also affect the Auckland Museum, MOTAT and the Regional Amenities.
- That the Finance and Strategy
Committee agrees that the final form of the submission to the Select Committee
be delegated to the Chief Executive.
CARRIED
DECEMBER 2008 QUARTER TREASURY OUTCOMES VERSUS RISK LIMITS
- That the Finance and Strategy Committee notes
that during the December 2008 quarter, the Treasury Group operated within the
policy limits established by the Treasury Management Policy, as approved by
Council, and in accordance with the strategic risk limits approved by the
Treasury Management Steering Group.
- That the Finance and Strategy Committee notes
that as at 31 December, the cost of the debt portfolio was 7.34% and the return
on the Trusts & Reserves portfolio was 7.29%.
- That the Finance and Strategy Committee notes
that following the successful placement of $100 million of bonds with
institutional investors, the quantum of funding required under the retail issue
reduced to $150 million.
- That officers report on issues
related to an early future bond issue including appropriate measures which could
enable that a preferential allocation of the bonds issue goes to Auckland City
residents or ratepayers.
CARRIED
FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED 28 FEBRUARY 2009
The Chairperson moved:
- That the Finance and Strategy Committee notes
that the financial report for the eight months ended 28 February 2009
highlighting:
- That councils' performance in keeping its year
to date operating expenditure $11.9 million favourable to budget; and
- That a year to date capital expenditure under
spend of $24.8 million against budget, comprising:
- $49.0 million capital expenditure over spend,
of which $10.0 million is the earlier than planned acquisition of 69 Captain
Springs Road, offset by; and
- $73.8 million year to date capital expenditure
under spend.
- That the Finance and Strategy Committee requests
that officers use their best endeavours to continue to deliver an operating
surplus well in excess of budget through to the end of the year.
Councillor Casey moved the following amendment by way of
replacement to B and adding new resolution C:
- That officers to
report on the $0.7 million under spend on Community Development Funding,
Programme and Advice to the Community Services Committee.
A
division was called for amendment B, voting on which was as follows:
| For the
Amendment: |
Against the
Amendment: |
| Cr Dr Cathy Casey Cr Mark Donnelly
Cr Richard Northey |
Cr Douglas Armstrong Cr Paul Goldsmith
Cr Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga
Deputy Mayor David Hay |
His Worship the Mayor and Councillor Bhatnagar were absent.
The
amendment B was declared LOST by 4 votes to 3.
-
That Officers report to the Transport Committee on the $1.1 million under spend
on cycleways and walkways.
The amendment C was put by a show of hands and declared
LOST by 5 votes to 2.
The
Chairperson put the substantive motion:
- That the Finance and Strategy Committee notes
that the financial report for the eight months ended 28 February 2009
highlighting:
- That councils' performance in keeping its
year to date operating expenditure $11.9 million favourable to budget with the
expectation that full year result will be reduced to a surplus of approximately
$6 million; and
- That a year to date capital expenditure
under spend of $24.8 million against budget, comprising:
- $49.0 million capital expenditure over
spend, of which $10.0 million is the earlier than planned acquisition of 69
Captain Springs Road, offset by; and
- $73.8 million year to date capital
expenditure under spend.
- That savings include the sum of $500,000 due
to energy efficient lighting systems that have been installed and energy savings
initiatives introduced during the year.
- That the Finance and Strategy Committee
requests that officers use their best endeavours to continue to deliver an
operating surplus well in excess of budget through to the end of the year.
CARRIED
GOVERNANCE DELEGATIONS REGISTER AMENDMENTS
That it be a recommendation to Council:
- That Council adopts the amendments
to the Governance Delegations Register set out in the appendices to the
Governance Delegations Register Amendments report dated 6 April 2009, noting
that some delegations are being removed because they are staff delegations and
others are being added because of omissions, corrections or in the case of the
Regional Governance Committee further are needed and alterations, and subject to
the following additional alterations:
- That in the delegations shown at Appendix 2, pages 46 of the
report for provision RG8 be replaced by RG7 and that the amended entry in the
Delegations Register be accepted to read:
|
Transition |
RG7 |
Power to recommend to council the appointment of members or officers to
make representations on behalf of council at select committee hearings
and/or any other processes. |
Regional Governance
Committee |
- That the new delegations to be added to the register as shown at
Appendix 2, pages 48 and 49 of the report, under sections 77B(3)(c) and 92A(2)
of the Resource Management Act 1991 be amended by removing the position title
"Arborist" from the list of delegates and that the entries in the Delegations
Register for those sections be accepted to read:
|
Resource Management Act 1991 |
77B(3)(c) |
Power to decline an application for a restricted
discretionary activity. |
Group Manager, City Planning; Manager, Central Area Planning; Manager,
Citywide Strategy; Manager, Heritage; Manager, Isthmus Outer Sector;
Manager, Isthmus Inner Sector; Manager, Gulf Islands Sector; Group
Manager, Auckland City Environments; Manager, Regulatory Planning;
Principal Planner; Senior Arborist; Appeals Manager; Manager,
Environmental Health and Licensing; Manager, Resource Consents;
Manager, Hauraki Gulf Islands, ACE; Manager, Service Requests; Project
Manager, Compliance; Team Leader, Incident Management; Senior Planner,
Compliance; Planning Team Leader, Subdivisions; Planning Team Leader;
Project Manager, Complex Consents; Planning Team Leader, Hauraki Gulf
Islands; Senior Planner, Hauraki Gulf Islands; Senior Subdivisions
Officer; Level 4 Planner; Resource Consent Monitoring Leader; Senior
Planner, Advice and Lodgements; Senior Planner, Resource Consents;
Team Leader, Hearing Commissioner |
|
Resource Management Act 1991 |
92A(2) |
Power to set timeframe for responding to request
for further information. |
Group Manager, Auckland City Environments;
Manager, Regulatory Planning; Principal Planner; Appeals Manager;
Manager, Resource Consents; Manager, Hauraki Gulf Islands, ACE;
Manager, Development Engineering; Planning Team Leader, Subdivisions;
Planning Team Leader; Project Manager, Complex Consents; Planning Team
Leader, Hauraki Gulf Islands; Senior Planner, Hauraki Gulf Islands;
Senior Subdivisions Officer; Level 4 Planner; Senior Planner, Advice
and Lodgements; Senior Planner, Resource Consents; Level 3 Planner;
Level 2 Planner; Development Engineer; Manager, Central Area
Planning; Group Manager, City Planning; Manager, Citywide Strategy;
Manager, Heritage; Manager, Isthmus Outer Sector; Manager, Isthmus
Inner Sector; Manager, Gulf Island Sector; Lead Planner, Central
Area; Level 1 Planner; Subdivision Officer; Team Leader, Hearing
Commissioner |
- That in the delegation to the Specialist Hearings Subcommittee
shown at Appendix 3, page 57, of the report, where the "provision number" column
refers to "57A; " of the Resource Management Act 1991 that this be altered to
read "357A;" and that the amended entry in the Delegations Register be accepted
to read.
|
Resource Management Act 1991 |
357; 357A; 357B; 357C; and 357D |
Power to hear and decide objections under the Act.
This includes but is not limited to reducing or waiving financial
contributions imposed as consent conditions, or granting whole or
partial remissions of fees and charges. |
Specialist Hearings Subcommittee |
- That the delegations shown at Appendix 3, pages 62 and 67 of the
report for sections 88(3), 92A and 104 of the Resource Management Act 1991 be
amended by removing the position title "Arborist" from the list of delegates and
that the amended entries in the Delegations Register be accepted to read:
| Resource Management Act 1991 |
88(3) |
Power to determine the whether the information
in a resource consent application meets the minimum requirements of the
Act. |
Group Manager, City Planning; Manager, Central
Area Planning; Manager, Citywide Strategy; Manager, Heritage;
Manager, Isthmus Outer Sector; Manager, Isthmus Inner Sector; Manager,
Gulf Islands Sector; Lead Senior Planner, Central Area; Group Manager,
Auckland City Environments; Manager, Regulatory Planning; Principal
Planner; Appeals Manager; Manager, Resource Consents; Manager,
Hauraki Gulf Islands, ACE; Planning Team Leader, Subdivisions;
Planning Team Leader; Project Manager, Complex Consents; Planning Team
Leader, Hauraki Gulf Islands; Senior Planner, Hauraki Gulf Islands;
Senior Subdivisions Officer; Level 4 Planner; Resource Consent
Monitoring Leader; Senior Planner, Advice and Lodgements; Senior
Planner, Resource Consents; Team Leader, Hearing Commissioner; Level 3
Planner; Level 2 Planner; Level 1 Planner; |
| Resource Management Act 1991 |
92A |
Power to set timeframe for responding to request
for further information. |
Group Manager, Auckland City Environments;
Manager, Regulatory Planning; Principal Planner; Appeals Manager;
Manager, Resource Consents; Manager, Hauraki Gulf Islands, ACE;
Manager, Development Engineering; Planning Team Leader, Subdivisions;
Planning Team Leader; Project Manager, Complex Consents; Planning Team
Leader, Hauraki Gulf Islands; Senior Planner, Hauraki Gulf Islands;
Senior Subdivisions Officer; Level 4 Planner; Senior Planner, Advice
and Lodgements; Senior Planner, Resource Consents; Level 3 Planner;
Level 2 Planner; Development Engineer; Manager, Central Area
Planning; Group Manager, City Planning; Manager, Citywide Strategy;
Manager, Heritage; Manager, Isthmus Outer Sector; Manager, Isthmus
Inner Sector; Manager, Gulf Islands Sector; Lead Planner, Central
Area; Level 1 Planner; Subdivision Officer; Team Leader, Hearing
Commissioner |
| Resource Management Act 1991 |
104 |
Duty to take matters into consideration and to
exclude other matters when considering an application. |
Group Manager, City Planning; Manager, Central
Area Planning; Manager, Citywide Strategy; Manager, Heritage;
Manager, Isthmus Outer Sector; Manager, Isthmus Inner Sector; Manager,
Gulf Islands Sector; Lead Senior Planner, Central Area; Group Manager,
Auckland City Environments; Manager, Regulatory Planning; Principal
Planner; Appeals Manager; Manager, Environmental Health and
Licensing; Manager, Resource Consents; Manager, Hauraki Gulf Islands,
ACE; Planning Team Leader, Subdivisions; Planning Team Leader;
Project Manager, Complex Consents; Planning Team Leader, Hauraki Gulf
Islands; Senior Planner, Hauraki Gulf Islands; Senior Subdivisions
Officer; Level 4 Planner; Resource Consent Monitoring Leader; Senior
Planner, Advice and Lodgements; Senior Planner, Resource Consents;
Level 1 Planner; Level 2 Planner; Level 3 Planner; Team Leader,
Hearing Commissioner |
- That the delegation shown at Appendix 3, page 82 of the report for
section 357(7) of the Resource Management Act 1991 be altered by removing the
subsection (7) of the provision number and substituting the letter D and that
the amended entry in the Delegations Register be accepted to read:
|
Resource Management Act 1991 |
357D |
Power to uphold [but not dismiss] objections. |
Group Manager, City Planning; Group Manager,
Auckland City Environments; Principal Planner; Appeals Manager |
- That Council agrees to delegate to the Chairperson and Deputy
Chairperson of the Finance and Strategy Committee and Councillor Northey the
power to consider and approve the final wording of any further proposed
amendments to the delegations in general and for the Regional Governance
Committee.
CARRIED
EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC : LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL INFORMATION AND MEETINGS ACT 1987
The Chairperson moved:
That the public be excluded from the following part(s) of the proceedings
of this meeting.
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is
excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and
the specific grounds under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.
| Item No. |
General subject of each matter to be considered |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter |
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable) |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution |
| C1. |
DELEGATED DECISIONS OF THE GROUP MANAGER PROPERTY AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
MANAGER |
Public conduct of matter would be likely
to result in disclosure of information for which good reason to withhold
exists under section 7. |
Section 7(2)(h) The
withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local
authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial
activities.
In particular,
the report contains references to the property's value and information
that may impact on the property owner's commercial activities;
identification of the site and contract terms which form the basis of
negotiations between council and the landowner; sensitive information
about council's proposed intentions for the site, which could prejudice
or disadvantage its commercial activities. |
Section 48(1)(a) The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists
under section 7. |
| C2. |
WATERCARE'S 2009 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE INTENT |
Public conduct of matter would be likely
to result in disclosure of information for which good reason to withhold
exists under section 7. |
Section 7(2)(i)
The
withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local
authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations
(including commercial and industrial negotiations).
In particular,
the report will inform Auckland City Council's recommendations to SRG
regarding Watercare's Statement of Intent, which in turn will influence
the SRG's joint position on this issue. Its disclosure to the public,
and thus to the other negotiating party, has the potential to cause
prejudice or disadvantage once the negotiations with Watercare take
place. |
Section 48(1)(a) The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists
under section 7. |
| C3. |
REVIEW OF WATERCARE'S 2009 FUNDING PLAN |
Public conduct of matter would be likely
to result in disclosure of information for which good reason to withhold
exists under section 7. |
Section 7(2)(i)
The
withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local
authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations
(including commercial and industrial negotiations).
In particular,
the report will inform Auckland City Council's recommendations to SRG
regarding Watercare's Statement of Intent, which in turn will influence
the SRG's joint position on this issue. Its disclosure to the public,
and thus to the other negotiating party, has the potential to cause
prejudice or disadvantage once the negotiations with Watercare take
place. |
Section 48(1)(a) The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists
under section 7. |
[Secretarial note: The meeting
adjourned at 11:22am and reconvened at 11:40am due to a fire evacuation.]
Councillor Casey moved the
following amendment by way of addition:
- That Watercare's 2009
Statement of Corporate Intent be considered in the open agenda.
A division was called for
amendment A, voting on which was as follows:
| For the
Amendment: |
Against the
Amendment: |
| Cr Dr Cathy Casey Cr Richard Northey |
Cr Douglas Armstrong Cr Mark Donnelly
Cr Paul Goldsmith
Cr Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga |
His Worship the Mayor,
Deputy Mayor Hay and Councillor Bhatnagar were absent.
The
amendment A was declared LOST by 4 votes to 2.
- That the Committee
reaffirms where appropriate in future all reports on CCO and similar
organisations' matters be divided into public and confidential reports to allow
transparency and public involvement in the democratic process.
A
division was called for amendment B, voting on which was as follows:
| For the
Amendment: |
Against the
Amendment: |
| Cr Dr Cathy Casey Cr Mark Donnelly
Cr Richard Northey |
Cr Douglas Armstrong Cr Paul Goldsmith
Cr Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga |
His Worship the Mayor, Deputy Mayor Hay and Councillor Bhatnagar were absent.
Voting in the division was TIED with 3 votes for and against. The Chairperson
exercised his casting vote against the amendment. The amendment B was declared
LOST by 4 votes to 3.
The Chairperson put the
substantive motion:
That the public be excluded from the following part(s) of the
proceedings of this meeting.
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is
excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and
the specific grounds under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.
| Item No. |
General subject of each matter to be considered |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter |
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable) |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution |
| C1. |
DELEGATED DECISIONS OF THE GROUP MANAGER PROPERTY AND PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT MANAGER |
Public conduct of matter would be
likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason to
withhold exists under section 7. |
Section 7(2)(h) The
withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local
authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial
activities.
In
particular, the report contains references to the property's value and
information that may impact on the property owner's commercial
activities; identification of the site and contract terms which form the
basis of negotiations between council and the landowner; sensitive
information about council's proposed intentions for the site, which
could prejudice or disadvantage its commercial activities. |
Section 48(1)(a) The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists
under section 7. |
| C2. |
WATERCARE'S 2009 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE INTENT |
Public conduct of matter would be
likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason to
withhold exists under section 7. |
Section 7(2)(i)
The
withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local
authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations
(including commercial and industrial negotiations).
In
particular, the report will inform Auckland City Council's
recommendations to SRG regarding Watercare's Statement of Intent, which
in turn will influence the SRG's joint position on this issue. Its
disclosure to the public, and thus to the other negotiating party, has
the potential to cause prejudice or disadvantage once the negotiations
with Watercare take place. |
Section 48(1)(a) The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists
under section 7. |
| C3. |
REVIEW OF WATERCARE'S 2009 FUNDING PLAN |
Public conduct of matter would be
likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason to
withhold exists under section 7. |
Section 7(2)(i)
The
withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local
authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations
(including commercial and industrial negotiations).
In
particular, the report will inform Auckland City Council's
recommendations to SRG regarding Watercare's Statement of Intent, which
in turn will influence the SRG's joint position on this issue. Its
disclosure to the public, and thus to the other negotiating party, has
the potential to cause prejudice or disadvantage once the negotiations
with Watercare take place. |
Section 48(1)(a) The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists
under section 7. |
CARRIED
There being no further business
the Chairperson declared the meeting closed at 12:15 pm.
|