Council member and meetings
MINUTES FOR AN EXTRAORDINARY ANNUAL PLAN DIRECTION SETTING MEETING HELD ON
TUESDAY, 15 FEBRUARY 2005 AT 9:35AM
|
PRESENT: |
Councillor |
Vern |
Walsh, JP |
[Chairman] |
| |
His Worship the Mayor Mr Dick Hubbard, ONZM |
|
| |
Councillors: |
Neil |
Abel |
|
| |
|
Doug |
Armstrong, QSO |
|
| |
|
Leila |
Boyle |
|
| |
|
Dr. Cathy |
Casey |
|
| |
|
Christine |
Caughey |
[Until 1:56pm item 9; from 2:00pm part item 9] |
| |
|
Bill |
Christian, JP |
|
| |
|
Glenda |
Fryer |
[Until 12:28pm item 6; from 12:30pm part item 6; until 2:10pm; from
2:12pm part item 11] |
| |
|
Dr. John |
Hinchcliff, CNZM |
|
| |
Deputy Mayor |
Dr Bruce |
Hucker, QSO |
|
| |
|
Linda |
Leighton |
[From 10:40am part item 3; until 12:09pm item 5; from 12:11 part item
5] |
| |
|
Toni |
Millar |
|
| |
|
Scott |
Milne, JP |
|
| |
|
Graeme |
Mulholland, JP |
|
| |
|
Richard |
Northey, ONZM |
|
| |
|
Noelene |
Raffills |
|
| |
|
Penny |
Sefuiva |
|
| |
|
Richard |
Simpson |
|
| |
|
Faye |
Storer |
[Until 10:46 item 3; from 10:49am part item 3] |
___________________________________
APOLOGIES
That the apology from Councillor Leighton for lateness be accepted.
CARRIED
EXTRAORDINARY BUSINESS
There was no extraordinary business.
GENERAL RATING POLICY FOR 2005/2006
The Chairman moved:
That the committee:
Confirms a 2.7% inflation adjustment in the general rate.
Notes that the implementation of the next step of the long-term
differential strategy has already been confirmed.
Reduces the uniform annual general charge from $189 to $95, with the
difference being made up through the value based rate.
Councillor Milne moved the following amendments:
|
(i) That the Finance committee note that the tone and content of the
mayor and deputy mayor's media releases and press conferences convey the
clear impression that major decisions on rates and policy have already
been made and that this appears to usurp the consultation processes
required by the legislation and accordingly the Finance committee request
that the chief executive seek a legal opinion on whether this is the case
and act on the advice received.
LOST
|
|
(ii) That as a matter of policy the full council be briefed on major
rating and policy announcements prior to them being released to the public
and media.
CARRIED
Councillor Armstrong moved the following amendments:
|
| (iii) That (i) be amended to add the words "that this be levied by
increasing the uniform annual general component charge of the rate".
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Richard Simpson
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
The amendment was declared LOST by 14 votes to 6.
|
|
(iv) That (iii) be deleted.
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills
Cr Richard Simpson |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
The amendment was declared LOST by 12 votes to 8.
|
The Chairman put the following substantive motion in parts:
- That the committee:
|
Confirms a 2.7% inflation adjustment in the general rate.
|
|
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Motion: |
Against the Motion: |
|
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Richard Simpson
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills |
The motion was declared CARRIED by 14 votes to 6.
|
|
(ii) Notes that the implementation of the next step of the
long-term differential strategy has already been confirmed.
CARRIED
|
|
(iii)
Reduces the uniform annual general charge from $189 to $95, with
the difference being made up through the value based rate.
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Motion: |
Against the Motion: |
|
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills
Cr Richard Simpson |
The motion was declared CARRIED by 12 votes to 8.
|
- That as a matter of policy the full council be briefed on major
rating and policy announcements prior to them being released to the
public and media.
CARRIED
The Chairman adjourned the meeting at 11.10am and reconvened the meeting
at 11.20am.
SUMMARY OF RATING POLICY IMPACTS
The Chairman moved:
That the information from the Senior Analyst, Treasury and the Financial
Policy Analyst, Treasury dated 9 February 2005 be received.
Councillor Milne moved the following amendments:
|
(i) That officers be asked to present a budget to Combined Committees
that limits any rates increase to within the rate of inflation.
|
|
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Richard Simpson
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
The amendment was declared LOST by 14 votes to 6.
(ii) That the following words be added - "noting that the officers
advise that the rates increase being considered would result in a rates
increase of approximately 10%. This is 3.5 times the expected rate of
inflation and far greater than under the previous council."
LOST
|
The Chairman put the following substantive motion:
That the information from the Senior Analyst, Treasury and the Financial
Policy Analyst, Treasury dated 9 February 2005 be received.
CARRIED
RATES REMISSION POLICIES AND DISCOUNT POLICY FOR 2005/2006
The Chairman moved:
That the committee confirm that a proposal for an extended rates rebate
scheme to address the issue of assistance to low-income individual
ratepayers be prepared.
Councillor Millar moved the following amendment:
|
(i) That the committee record its view that assistance to low income
individuals to meet living expenses including rates is primarily the
responsibility of central government and any policies of council shall
not result in ratepayers with the similar valued residential properties
paying different amounts of rates.
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills
Cr Faye Storer |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Richard Simpson
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
The amendment was declared LOST by 13 votes to 7.
The Chairman put the following substantive motion:
That the committee confirm that a proposal for an extended rates rebate
scheme to address the issue of assistance to low-income individual
ratepayers be prepared.
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Motion: |
Against the Motion: |
|
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Richard Simpson
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills |
The motion was declared CARRIED by 14 votes to 6.
|
TARGETED RATES UPDATE AND OPTIONS
The Chairman moved:
That the committee:
Confirms that the targeted rate for refuse collection continues to be
based on a fixed amount per refuse collection service (currently
estimated to be $129 per service) for 2005/2006.
Requests that officers report to Combined Committees on the impact of
removing the Waiheke Island transfer station targeted rate or retaining
it at it's current level of $26.
Confirms the adopted CBD targeted rate that captures the savings
accrued to the CBD business community resulting from the adopted general
rate differential strategy, to fund the redevelopment and revitalisation
of the CBD.
Confirms that the CBD targeted rate to apply to CBD residential
ratepayers continues to be based on a fixed charge of $52 per
residential unit in 2005/2006.
Confirms that the targeted rates for transport, open space and
volcanic cones and heritage and urban design be applied as value-based
targeted rates based on the differential targets for the general rate.
Notes that further work on the stormwater targeted rate will be
deferred.
Notes that the officers will continue to liaise with Newmarket
business association on a streetscape upgrade for the Newmarket business
centre.
That the Mayor continue to work with Local Government New Zealand and
the Government to identify and implement alternative sources of revenue
in addition to rates.
Councillor Armstrong moved the following amendment:
|
(i) That (ii) be deleted and the officers recommendations be
confirmed, i.e. that the Waiheke Island Refuse Station targeted rate be
increased to $52.
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Richard Simpson
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr Toni Millar was absent.
The amendment was declared LOST by 14 votes to 5.
|
|
(ii) That (v) be amended to read - "that any targeted rates adopted
by council are levied on a uniform basis and not on value for reasons of
equity."
The above amendment was put by show of hands and declared LOST by 12
votes to 8.
The Chairman put the following substantive motion in parts:
That the committee:
Confirms that the targeted rate for refuse collection continues to be
based on a fixed amount per refuse collection service (currently estimated
to be $129 per service) for 2005/2006.
Confirms the adopted CBD targeted rate that captures the savings
accrued to the CBD business community resulting from the adopted general
rate differential strategy, to fund the redevelopment and revitalisation
of the CBD.
Confirms that the CBD targeted rate to apply to CBD residential
ratepayers continues to be based on a fixed charge of $52 per residential
unit in 2005/2006.
Notes that further work on the stormwater targeted rate will be
deferred.
Notes that the officers will continue to liaise with Newmarket
business association on a streetscape upgrade for the Newmarket business
centre.
That the Mayor continue to work with Local Government New Zealand and
the Government to identify and implement alternative sources of revenue
in addition to rates.
CARRIED
|
|
vii) Requests that officers report to Combined Committees on the
impact of removing the Waiheke Island transfer station targeted rate or
retaining it at it's current level of $26.
CARRIED
|
|
viii) Confirms that the targeted rates for transport, open space and
volcanic cones and heritage and urban design be applied as value-based
targeted rates based on the differential targets for the general rate.
CARRIED
|
The Chairman adjourned the meeting at 12.35pm and reconvened at 1.00pm.
TRANSPORT TARGETED RATE
The Chairman moved:
- That the committee confirms the direction towards the introduction of
a 5.0% targeted transport rate.
- That the committee request officers to review the list of projects in
line with the decreased percentage in the rate and report the amended list
back to Combined Committees in March 2005.
Councillor Raffills moved the following amendments:
|
(i) That a C be added - "that such a targeted rate only be
implemented if all other external funding sources are exhausted and that
there is overwhelming support from all major stakeholders including
business demonstrated in the consultation process."
|
|
(ii) That if overwhelming support is demonstrated such a targeted rate
be equitably levied by way of a uniform charge rather than a value
mechanism.
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Richard Simpson
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
The amendments were declared LOST by 14 votes to 6.
|
|
Councillor Simpson moved the following amendment:
(iii) That A be amended to read "That the committee confirms the
direction towards the introduction of a 5.5% targeted transport rate."
LOST
|
The Chairman put the following substantive motion:
- That the committee confirms the direction towards the introduction
of a 5.0% targeted transport rate.
- That the committee request officers to review the list of projects
in line with the decreased percentage in the rate and report the amended
list back to Combined Committees in March 2005.
CARRIED
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Motion: |
Against the Motion: |
|
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Richard Simpson
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills |
Cr Faye Storer abstained from voting.
The motion was declared CARRIED by 13 votes to 6, with 1 abstention.
OVERVIEW REPORT - OPEN SPACE & VOLCANIC CONES TARGETED RATE
The Chairman moved:
- That the committee confirms the direction towards the introduction
of a targeted rate for open space and volcanic cones equivalent to 1%.
- That the committee endorses the proposed targeted rate project list
as a basis for the 1% targeted rate.
Councillor Millar moved the following amendments:
|
(i) That a C. be added - "that such a targeted rate only be implemented
if all other external funding sources are exhausted and that there is
overwhelming support from all major stakeholders including business
demonstrated in the consultation process."
|
|
(ii) That if overwhelming support is demonstrated such a targeted rate be
equitably levied by way of a uniform charge rather than a value mechanism.
|
The above amendments were put by show of hands and declared LOST by 13
votes to 7.
The Chairman put the following substantive motion:
- That the committee confirms the direction towards the introduction
of a targeted rate for open space and volcanic cones equivalent to 1%.
- That the committee endorses the proposed targeted rate project list
as a basis for the 1% targeted rate.
CARRIED
CITY DEVELOPMENT TARGETED RATE
The Chairman moved:
- That the committee confirms the direction towards a targeted rate
of 0.5% for heritage and urban design for incorporation into the draft
annual plan.
- That detailed funding be considered at Combined Committees in
March 2005.
Councillor Leighton moved the following amendments:
|
(i) That a C be added - "that such a targeted rate only be
implemented if all other external funding sources are exhausted and that
there is overwhelming support from all major stakeholders including
business demonstrated in the consultation process."
|
|
(ii) That if overwhelming support is demonstrated such a targeted rate
be equitably levied by way of a uniform charge rather than a value
mechanism.
|
LOST
The Chairman put the following substantive motion:
- That the committee confirms the direction towards a targeted rate
of 0.5% for heritage and urban design for incorporation into the draft
annual plan.
- That detailed funding be considered at Combined Committees in
March 2005.
CARRIED
THE ROLE OF AUCKLAND CITY IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, TOURISM AND MAJOR
EVENTS
The Chairman moved:
- That the Committee endorse a proactive approach to attracting,
developing and retaining major events in Auckland City in view of the
positive economic, social and cultural benefits to the city which such
events can generate.
- That an additional $100,000 be added to the events promotion budget
together with a reallocation of up to $200,000 from the existing events
promotion budget that is carried out in a way that is not at the expense
of smaller and local events, with the primary purpose of supporting the
retention and growth of existing major events through assistance with
compliance and ancillary costs such as barriers, signs and consents and
the secondary purpose to attract new events leaving $621,632 available for
existing events promotion.
- That it be noted the level of funding recommended for smaller events
is the delegation of the Arts, Culture and Recreation Committee and that
the Economic Development and Sustainable Business Committee does not
advocate the reduction of funding for smaller events.
- That a further commitment of $223,000 be made for the Auckland
Waterfront Festival Event in 2005/2006 to support the proposed Auckland
Waterfront Festival.
- That the Committee also note that a proposal to provide $100,000 for
council initiatives to support the development of the technology industry
is included in the 2005/2006 budget for consideration at the Combined
Committees meeting in March.
- That during the 2005/2006 financial year, further exploration be
made to establishing a long term sustainable funding base for tourism and
major events, including:
|
(i) exploring rates or charges that are targeted at the
infrastructure or costs generated by the tourism industry, and
|
|
(ii) the concept of a targeted rate to achieve this being explored in
consultation with affected parties.
|
Councillor Milne moved the following amendment:
|
(i) That A be amended to add the following words after endorsed… "the
previous council's" and after the word generate… "recognising that
inevitably some residents may be adversely affected but council need to have
regard for the greater good of the city in reaching a decision on individual
events."
|
Councillor Hinchcliffe moved the following procedural motion:
That the matter be put.
CARRIED
The amendment from Councillor Milne was put and declared LOST.
The Chairman put the following substantive motion:
- That the Committee endorse a proactive approach to attracting,
developing and retaining major events in Auckland City in view of the
positive economic, social and cultural benefits to the city which such
events can generate.
- That an additional $100,000 be added to the events promotion
budget together with a reallocation of up to $200,000 from the existing
events promotion budget that is carried out in a way that is not at the
expense of smaller and local events, with the primary purpose of
supporting the retention and growth of existing major events through
assistance with compliance and ancillary costs such as barriers, signs
and consents and the secondary purpose to attract new events leaving
$621,632 available for existing events promotion.
- That it be noted the level of funding recommended for smaller
events is the delegation of the Arts, Culture and Recreation Committee
and that the Economic Development and Sustainable Business Committee
does not advocate the reduction of funding for smaller events.
- That a further commitment of $223,000 be made for the Auckland
Waterfront Festival Event in 2005/2006 to support the proposed Auckland
Waterfront Festival.
- That the Committee also note that a proposal to provide $100,000
for council initiatives to support the development of the technology
industry is included in the 2005/2006 budget for consideration at the
Combined Committees meeting in March.
- That during the 2005/2006 financial year, further exploration be
made to establishing a long term sustainable funding base for tourism
and major events, including:
|
(i) exploring rates or charges that are targeted at the
infrastructure or costs generated by the tourism industry, and
|
|
(ii) the concept of a targeted rate to achieve this being explored
in consultation with affected parties.
|
- That council continuously seek to retain and enhance popular
existing events enjoyed by the public of Auckland such as the Western
Springs Speedway.
CARRIED
ENHANCED ROLE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM LEADING IN URBAN
SUSTAINABILITY
The Chairman moved:
- That the funding of 0.5% of the general rate for an enhanced role in
community development be included in the draft annual plan.
- That officers be authorised to:
Undertake further work with Housing New Zealand, the private sector
and third party sector providers to determine the nature of joint
venture and other partnership arrangements to increase the supply of
affordable housing.
Scope the community development initiatives listed as priorities for
2005/2006 in Leading in Urban Sustainability with a view to reporting
back to Combined Committees in March 2005.
Councillor Mulholland moved the following amendments:
|
(i) That the following be added to A - "that such funding only be
provided if there is overwhelming support from all major stakeholders
including business demonstrated in the consultation and overwhelming
support is demonstrated such funding be levied by way of a uniform charge
mechanism rather than a value based mechanism."
|
|
(ii) That affordable housing is a Central Government responsibility,
accordingly Council's role be limited to supporting facilitation of
affordable housing and this should not be funded through rates.
|
LOST
The Chairman put the following substantive motion:
- That the funding of 0.5% of the general rate for an enhanced role
in community development be included in the draft annual plan.
- That officers be authorised to:
Undertake further work with Housing New Zealand, the private sector
and third party sector providers to determine the nature of joint
venture and other partnership arrangements to increase the supply of
affordable housing.
Scope the community development initiatives listed as priorities
for 2005/2006 in Leading in Urban Sustainability with a view to
reporting back to Combined Committees in March 2005.
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Motion: |
Against the Motion: |
|
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Richard Simpson
His Worship the Mayor
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr D Armstrong
Cr Linda Leighton
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills
Cr Faye Storer |
The motion was declared CARRIED by 13 votes to 7.
There being no further business the Chairman declared the meeting closed at
2:35pm.