|
|
|
Council member and meetings
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
*COMBINED COMMITTEES
HELD ON THURSDAY, 21 JUNE 2007 AT 9.34 AM
|
PRESENT: |
Councillors: |
Vern |
Walsh, JP |
[Chairman] |
|
|
His Worship the Mayor |
Dick |
Hubbard, ONZM |
|
|
|
Councillors |
Neil |
Abel |
|
|
|
|
Douglas |
Armstrong |
|
|
|
|
Leila |
Boyle |
|
|
|
|
Dr Cathy |
Casey |
|
|
|
|
Christine |
Caughey |
|
|
|
|
Bill |
Christian, JP |
|
|
|
|
Glenda |
Fryer |
|
|
|
|
Dr John |
Hinchcliff, CNZM |
[until 11.40am, item 13; from 11.43am,
item 15] |
|
|
Deputy Mayor |
Dr Bruce |
Hucker, QSO |
|
|
|
|
Toni |
Millar, JP |
|
|
|
|
Scott |
Milne, JP |
[until 11.40am, item 13; from 11.48am.
item 17] |
|
|
|
Graeme |
Mulholland, JP |
|
|
|
|
Richard |
Northey, ONZM |
|
|
|
|
Noelene |
Rafills |
[until 2.15pm, item C1] |
|
|
|
Penny |
Sefuiva |
[from 10.26am, item 4] |
|
|
|
Faye |
Storer |
|
Secretarial Note:
The
Chairman opened the meeting at 9.34am and adjourned the meeting at 9.34am. The
meeting reconvened at 10.20am following the conclusion of the extraordinary
Finance and Corporate Business Committee meeting.
APOLOGIES
That the
apologies from Councillor Simpson for non-attendance and Councillor Leighton for
non-attendance (due to illness) be accepted.
CARRIED
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
That the minutes
of the *Combined Committees meeting held on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 be confirmed
as a true and correct record.
CARRIED
EXTRAORDINARY BUSINESS
There was no
extraordinary business.
OVERVIEW OF THE 2007/2008 ANNUAL PLAN
The General Manager
Finance gave an overview for the issues of the 2007/2008 Annual Plan.
[ATTACHMENT 4]
That the
information be received.
CARRIED
UPDATE ON BUDGETS FOR 2007/2008
Secretarial Note:
The Chairman moved
item 5 to enable discussion and questions, then 'parked' the item pending the
outcome of other items on the agenda.
That items 6, 7, 8 and 9 be considered at this point.
CARRIED
Secretarial Note:
The Chairman put the
following substantive motion in parts. A to C and E to I were taken together by
voices.
That it be a recommendation to Council:
- That the
revenue changes as detailed in appendix A of the report entitled "Update on
Budgets for 2007/2008" by the Corporate Planning Manager and Asset Planning
Manager dated 12 June 2007, be approved as follows:
|
Revenue Changes |
|
|
Row |
Revenue |
Nature of
revenue |
Change to budget |
Impact on
general rates |
|
1. |
Commercial
properties |
Net revenue for
purchase of Trans Tasman/Southern Spas property. |
-1,070,134 |
-1,070,134 |
|
2. |
Commercial
properties |
Net revenues from
Auckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative (AMETI) related
acquisitions |
-623,700 |
-623,700 |
|
3. |
Parking |
Increased revenue
from ticketing ($1,300,000) offset by the cost of five parking officers
and six infringement review advisors delivering and supporting the
increased ticketing ($700,000) |
-600,000 |
-600,000 |
|
4. |
Parking |
Increased pay and
display revenue ($1,300,000) offset by lost pay and display spaces
through the central connector project ($700,000) |
-600,000 |
-600,000 |
|
5. |
Parking |
Other revenue
increases in relation to internal carpark usage ($100,000); Matiatia
casual parking ($100,000) and downtown carpark tenancy $200,000. |
-400,000 |
-400,000 |
|
6. |
Auckland Zoo |
Additional revenue
from expected increase in zoo visitors |
-326,094 |
-326,094 |
|
7. |
Land Transport New
Zealand (LTNZ) subsidy |
Additional annual
revenue to be received from LTNZ in relation to the declared 10 year bus
shelter maintenance programme |
-268,000 |
-268,000 |
|
8. |
Commercial
properties |
Additional revenue
from berth acquisitions at Orakei marina |
-120,000 |
-120,000 |
|
9. |
Commercial
properties |
Additional Vodafone
revenue |
-50,000 |
-50,000 |
|
10. |
Sale recovery |
ARC database sale
recovery |
-50,000 |
-50,000 |
|
|
|
Sub-total |
-4,107,928 |
-4,107,928 |
- That the
savings detailed in appendix B of the report entitled "Update on Budgets for
2007/2008" by the Corporate Planning Manager and Asset Planning Manager, dated
12 June 2007, be approved as follows:
|
Savings |
|
Row |
Saving |
Nature of saving
and explanation |
Change to budget |
Impact on
general rates |
|
1. |
Auckland Museum and
MOTAT grants |
Confirmed 2007/2008
grants for Auckland Museum ($647,000 saving) and MOTAT ($97 expense) |
-550,000 |
-550,000 |
|
2. |
Capitalisation of
operating expenditure |
Capitalisation of
staff working on Transport Infrastructure Development projects |
-400,000 |
-400,000 |
|
3. |
Capitalisation of
operating expenditure |
Reclassification of
thermo-plastic road markings from opex to capex. |
-300,000 |
-300,000 |
|
4. |
Capitalisation of
operating expenditure |
Capitalisation of
staff working on Transport Strategy projects |
-300,000 |
-300,000 |
|
5. |
Auckland Festival
Trust |
Advance of 2007/2008
Auckland Festival Trust grant into 2006/2007. |
-200,000 |
-200,000 |
|
6. |
Support costs |
Reduction in the
requests for information, support/advice has led to a saving within the
Transport division |
-200,000 |
-200,000 |
|
7. |
Delayed projects |
Savings from
projects on hold - ferry design work, rail precincts design work and
only one project from funding strategy |
-200,000 |
-200,000 |
|
8. |
Westhaven Marina
maintenance |
Cost savings from
unscheduled and unplanned contractor costs to mitigate increased costs
in Westhaven Marina maintenance |
-90,000 |
-90,000 |
|
9. |
Auckland City events |
Overall saving
following establishment of Auckland City Events manager and
reprioritisation of budgets. |
-23,000 |
-23,000 |
|
|
|
Sub-total |
-2,263,000 |
-2,263,000 |
- That the
expenditure changes denoted as unavoidable in appendix C of the report entitled
"Update on Budgets for 2007/2008" by the Corporate Planning Manager and Asset
Planning Manager, dated 12 June 2007, be approved as follows:
|
Unavoidable
expenditure |
|
Row |
Expenditure |
Nature of saving
and explanation |
Change to budget |
Impact on
general rates |
|
1. |
Regulatory Review |
Delay in the
commencement of the review now means that planned 2006/2007 activities
will take place in 2007/2008. There is no increase in overall costs
over the two years. |
597,539 |
597,539 |
|
2. |
SAP licencing costs |
Additional SAP
licensing requirements for the Regulatory Review and OSCAR projects |
306,000 |
306,000 |
|
3. |
Electricity charges |
Higher electricitiy
expenses following review of property management costs. Auckland City
Council is now in a seven-year contract with Vector |
290,325 |
290,325 |
|
4. |
FileNet licencing
costs |
Additional FileNet
licensing requirements for the Regulatory review |
150,000 |
150,000 |
|
5. |
Continuation of
opening of Art Gallery main gallery building |
With a delay in the
Art Gallery renovations, the Main Gallery building is to be open for
three more months. This requires additional budget to fund salaries and
wages for Gallery Guides and Security staff. |
147,267 |
147,267 |
|
6. |
Hearings Team |
To fund increased
activity within Hearings, including review of Hauraki Gulf Islands &
Isthmus District Plan. Several costs are unrecoverable as Auckland City
Council is the applicant |
145,000 |
145,000 |
|
7. |
Abandoned vehicle
contract |
Revision of rates
relating to contract |
100,000 |
100,000 |
|
8. |
Holidays Act
requirements |
Increase in minimum
annual leave to four weeks requires the libraries and Art Gallery to
increase temporary staff budgets as positions must be back filled when
permanent staff on extra week's leave. |
85,216 |
85,216 |
|
9. |
Councillors salaries |
The Remuneration
Authority has set the remuneration increase for 2008 |
83,651 |
83,651 |
|
10. |
Bank transaction
charges |
There are projected
increases in bank transaction charges based on higher volumes. |
50,000 |
50,000 |
|
11. |
Hearings Team |
To fund an
additional resource within Hearings Team based on higher number of
hearings. |
45,000 |
45,000 |
|
12. |
New post codes
requirements by NZ post |
An additional
resource is required to update postcodes in Auckland City's name and
address database as required by NZ post. Implementation will avoid mail
delays. |
36,000 |
36,000 |
|
13. |
Increased audit fees |
Additional amount
based on quote from Audit NZ for interim audits, auditing annual reports
and long-term plans |
15,000 |
15,000 |
|
14. |
Local Government New
Zealand (LGNZ) annual subscription |
The LGNZ annual
subscription has increased from $83,000 to $98,000 |
15,000 |
15,000 |
|
15. |
Increased consent
volumes |
Project increase in
consent and licensing revenues based on 2006/2007 volumes. However,
this has been offset by the need to appoint four additional staff and
building accreditation training budget. |
0 |
0 |
|
16. |
Net interest
adjustment |
Increase in interest
expense/reduction in interest income as a result of additional and
timing of capital expenditure |
1,927,000 |
1,927,000 |
|
|
|
Sub-total |
3,992,998 |
3,992,998 |
CARRIED
Secretarial Note:
The Chairman put the
following resolution separately:
- That the
new requests for expenditure as detailed in appendix D of the report entitled
"Update on Budgets for 2007/2008" by the Corporate Planning Manager and Asset
Planning Manager, dated 12 June 2007, be approved as follows:
|
New requests for
expenditure |
|
Row |
Expenditure |
Nature of saving
and explanation |
Change to budget |
Impact on
general rates |
|
1. |
Auckland City
Council's remuneration policy |
Additional funding
is required to increase staff that are being paid well below the median
income for their industry.
|
400,000 |
400,000 |
|
2. |
Total of
confidential items
|
Refer to
confidential agenda |
236,000 |
236,000 |
|
3. |
Transport strategy
initiatives |
Three studies in
relation to neighbourhood access initiatives ($300,000) proposed by
LTNZ, business travel plans proposed by ARTA ($300,000). These costs
will be partly offset by expected subsidies ($450,000) |
150,000 |
150,000 |
|
4. |
The EdgeŽ -
Facilities Management System project |
Additional staff and
other expenses are required to implement the Facilities Management
System project - see Appendix G |
118,000 |
118,000 |
|
5. |
To manage the red
light camera project |
Management of the
red light camera project is to be handed back from ARTA to Auckland City
Council. This resource will be part funded by LTNZ through subsidy,
with the net cost to Auckland City Council. |
64,000 |
64,000 |
|
6. |
Vector Arena |
To increase the
amount for management and monitoring for the Arena |
60,000 |
60,000 |
|
7. |
Matiatia terminal
doors |
Budgeted cost of
$100,000 to be fully funded from expected increase in revenue from
Wharves fees. |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
Sub-total |
1,028,000 |
1,028,000 |
CARRIED
- That the
expenditure requests that will result in future efficiency gains as detailed in
appendix E of the report entitled "Update on Budgets for 2007/2008" by the
Corporate Planning Manager and Asset Planning Manager, dated 12 June 2007, be
approved as follows:
|
Expenditure requests that will result in
future efficiency gains |
|
Row |
Expenditure |
Nature of saving and explanation |
Change to budget |
Impact on general rates |
|
1. |
To fund temporary staffing through transition |
Transition cost (2007/2008 impact only) to enable project manager and
contract manager roles to migrate from consultants to in-house staff
without affecting service delivery. Expected annual saving (-$800,000)
requested to be used to fund the next item |
300,000 |
300,000 |
|
2. |
Asset management plans - condition surveys |
Additional funding is required to complete condition surveys for all
Auckland City Council's major buildings by December 2007. Measure and
value condition surveys are a core requirement to achieving meaningful
asset management plans. |
212,000 |
212,000 |
|
3. |
Annual property inspections |
Inspection every residential property at least once every six years will
increase data accuracy reducing the number of valuation objections and
therefore the cost of processing those objections ($250,000 ongoing
saving from 2008/2009) |
189,000 |
189,000 |
|
4. |
Asset management |
The role of Asset Analyst will undertake asset deterioration modelling
to ensure the updated asset management plan considers the best approach
to maintaining and renewing assets going forward |
100,000 |
100,000 |
|
|
|
Sub-total |
801,000 |
801,000 |
- That the
targeted rate expenditure changes as detailed in appendix F of the report
entitled "Update on Budgets for 2007/2008" by the Corporate Planning Manager and
Asset Planning Manager, dated 12 June 2007, be approved as follows:
|
Targeted rate expenditure changes |
|
Row |
Expenditure |
Nature of saving and explanation |
Change to budget |
Impact on general rates |
|
1. |
Making communities more relevant - transfer of expenditure from capital
to operating |
Projects approved by the Community Development and Equity Committee in
November 2006. |
849,000 |
0 |
|
2. |
CBD branding initiative |
To progress branding initiative in CBD as a partnership with Heart of
the City (HOTC) and Tourism Auckland - destination marketing |
400,000 |
0 |
|
3. |
Beach Road and Arena connections - transfer of expenditure from capital
to operating |
Funds concept and design work |
160,000 |
0 |
|
4. |
Stage 4 of Lorne St upgrade (area in front of library) |
To undertake concept and design work for project - capital works cannot
proceed until design work completed
|
100,000 |
0 |
|
5. |
Transport designated fund |
Deferral for AMETI related costs from the designated fund |
100,000 |
0 |
|
6. |
St Patrick's square upgrade - transfer of expenditure from capital to
operating |
Funds concept and design work. |
80,000 |
0 |
|
7. |
CBD Board initiative |
To research and gain an understanding of what actions are required to
consolidate and reinforce a core commercial area within the CBD. |
50,000 |
0 |
|
8. |
Refuse collection - higher growth |
Higher growth in the number of services increases collection and
disposal expenses related to numbers of bins, inflation and tonnage
($731,000) but is fully offset from higher targeted rate revenue and has
no impact on the $199 proposed charge. |
0 |
0 |
|
9. |
Implementation of quarter plans (Aotea, Victoria, Learning) and
development of additional quarter plan in 2009 |
Saving - focusing in 2007/2008 on branding for Aotea quarter to support
and align with CBD branding initiative. |
-50,000 |
|
|
10. |
Deferral of projects into 2008/2009 relating to: - Vibrant local centre; - making community facilities more relevant; and - New centre and library for Otahuhu initiatives |
Consequential operating expenses are also deferred into 2008/2009. |
-935,000 |
0 |
|
11. |
Net interest adjustment |
Increase in interest expense/reduction in interest income as a result of
changes in the timing of the expenditure and due to additional
expenditure. For example, the likely purchase of land around Wynyard
Point was originally planned to take place in 2014. The bringing
forward of this expenditure into 2008 requires the organisation to
borrow more than what was reported in the draft annual plan. The reason
this has no effect on the targeted rate revenue is that the revenue is
set to fully fund all expenditure by 2036. |
14,132,766 |
0 |
|
|
Total opex change |
Sub-total |
14,886,766 |
0 |
- That it be noted
that approval of all changes in resolutions A to F and other expenditure changes
of $285,000 reduces the general rate revenue by $263,000 and maintains an
overall rate increase of 3.6%.
- That a capital
expenditure programme of $594 million for 2007/2008, an increase of $58 million
over the amount reported in the draft 2007/2008 Annual Plan (with major changes
detailed in appendix G of the report entitled "Update on Budgets for 2007/2008"
by the Corporate Planning Manager and Asset Planning Manager dated 12 June
2007), be approved.
- That it be
noted that an additional $263,000 of operational expenditure can be supported
while maintaining an overall rate increase of 3.6%.
CARRIED
Secretarial Note:
The Chairman put the
following resolution separately:
- That the
following additional expenditure be provided for utilising the $263,000
available while maintaining the overall rate increase of 3.6%:
|
New requests for expenditure |
|
Row |
Expenditure |
Change to budget |
Impact on general rates |
|
1. |
Events/sponsorship budget |
20,000 |
20,000 |
|
2. |
Project K start up |
80,000 |
80,000 |
|
3. |
HIPPY programme |
50,000 |
50,000 |
|
4. |
Community Group Assistance Fund |
75,000 |
75,000 |
|
5. |
Encroachment Officer |
38,000 |
38,000 |
|
|
Total additional expenditure |
263,000 |
263,000 |
A
division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Motion: |
Against the Motion: |
|
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor, Cr Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor, Dick Hubbard
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr Doug Armstrong
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills |
Cr Linda Leighton and Cr Richard Simpson were absent.
The
motion was declared CARRIED by 12 votes to 6.
SPECIAL CONSULTATIVE PROCEDURES
2007 DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS
POLICY: SUBMISSIONS AND POLICY FOR ADOPTION
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
- That it be noted that the judgement in the Neil decision
reinforced the requirement that the cost allocation for each development
contribution activity should be considered separately in light of several
factors specified in the Local Government Act 2002.
Transport
- That the council's intention, after consideration of section 101(3) of
the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), to ensure that the costs of growth for the
transport activity are recovered primarily from the growth community be
approved.
- That it be noted that calculation of the transport cost of growth
excludes costs that are wholly concerned with service level increases and the
provision of benefits to the existing community; and evenly splits remaining
costs between the growth community and other users to take into account
operational benefits arising from the provision of capacity for growth.
- That the allocation of $205 million in growth costs to the growth
community to be recovered through development contributions be approved, noting
this represents 11.9 per cent of the gross capital spend on the transport
activity over the next ten years (the rest of the funding coming from rates,
subsidies and borrowing) which is appropriate after consideration of the factors
in section 101(3)(a) of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) and the overall
impact on community wellbeing under section 101(3)(b).
Public Space
- That it be noted that the Council's intention, after consideration of
section 101(3) of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), is to ensure that the
costs of growth for public space land acquisition and public space
infrastructure are recovered from the growth community.
- That it be noted that the calculation of public space cost of growth
eliminates any costs that are wholly concerned with the provision of benefits
for the existing community. The remaining costs are for the provision of new
public space capacity and, although existing residents will receive some benefit
from being able to access new public spaces (including Wynyard Point), none of
these capacity costs have been allocated to existing residents because they
will, as a result of growth, actually receive a diminished provision of public
space in relation to Council's target level of provision.
- That the allocation of $208.3 million for public space infrastructure and
$191 million for public space land acquisition be approved, noting that it
constitutes 78 per cent of the ten-year capital costs for this activity (the
rest of the money coming from rates) which is appropriate after consideration of
the factors in section 101(3)(a) of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) and the
overall impact on community wellbeing under section 101(3)(b).
Stormwater
- That the Council's intention, after consideration of section 101(3) of
the Local Government Act 2002, to ensure that the costs of growth for the stormwater activity are recovered primarily from the growth community be
approved.
- That it be noted that the stormwater methodology allocates the cost of
providing new stormwater capacity that benefits new and existing users by
employing a "shared savings" approach and all costs which are not capacity
related, such as renewals and capital works to improve stormwater quality
(service level improvements) are excluded from the analysis and allocated to
existing users.
- That the allocation of $86 million to the growth community for recovery
through development contributions be approved, noting this represents around
21.8 per cent of the council's $395 million capital spend on the stormwater
activity over the next ten years (the rest of it coming from rates and
charitable receipts), which is appropriate after consideration of the factors in
section 101(3)(a) of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) and the overall impact
on community wellbeing under section 101(3)(b).
Community amenities
- That the Council's intention, after consideration of section 101(3) of
the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), to ensure that the costs of growth for the
community amenities activity are recovered primarily from the growth community
be approved.
- That it be noted that the calculation of the cost of growth for the
community amenities activity is carried out on a project by project basis, and
for each project costs related to service level improvements and shortfall (both
of which mainly provide benefits for existing users) are excluded.
- That the allocation of $26.7 million for community amenities be approved, noting
this constitutes around 10 per cent of the ten-year capital costs for this
activity (the rest of the money coming largely from rates), which is appropriate
after consideration of the factors in section 101(3)(a) of the Local Government
Act 2002 (LGA) and the overall impact on community wellbeing under section
101(3)(b).
Changes to the policy
- That it be noted that the final 2007 Development Contribution Policy has
had the following significant updates since being presented to the 7 March 2007
Combined Committees meeting:
- Changes to ensure compliance with the Local Government Act 2002
(LGA) by explicitly noting that only consents that meet the thresholds in
section 197 to 199 of the LGA, as identified in the Neil decision, are
charged development contributions.
- Changes to ensure that the policy more explicitly provides a
comprehensive assessment of section 101(3) factors.
- An extension of the transition period for the introduction of the
increased charges under the 2007 policy from six months to 12 months, in the
central area only, which will lead to a further under recovery of public space
charges of around $4.7 million.
- Various minor changes to clarify issues raised by submitters and
in further legal advice.
- That the 2007 Development Contributions Policy as attached to the report
entitled "2007 development contributions policy: submissions and policy for
adoption" by H Bunn, Consultant, dated 12 June 2007, be adopted by Council to be
effective from 1 July 2007 (subject to any amendments from the 21 June Combined
Committees meeting).
Other
issues
- That it be noted that officers will continue to investigate and monitor
the possible effects of development contributions on development and will report
to council as appropriate.
- That it be noted that officers will work with interested submitters to
consider the household unit calculation factors applied to the transport
activity but any change will not occur until the 2008 policy.
CARRIED
INTERGENERATIONAL EQUITY AND
THE SUSTAINABLE DEBT POLICY
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
- That it be noted:
- That the majority of submissions received on the proposed change to
the debt policy via the Annual Plan process were supportive of the principle of
spreading costs more fairly between generations. This support was often
conditional upon borrowing being used in a prudent, conservative and sustainable
manner to avoid excessive debt levels and/or upon borrowing being used only to
fund major capital works projects with clearly demonstrable benefits for future
generations.
- That a significant minority of the submissions received were opposed
to the proposed change to the debt policy. Officers have considered each
submission and consider that no submission raised any significant concerns in
relation to proposed change.
- That while the submissions commented on both the pros and cons of
the proposed, on balance, the overall weight of the public feedback was in
support of the proposal.
- That the changes to the sustainable debt policy consulted on via the
draft 2007/2008 Annual Plan and amendments to the Long-term council community
plan be adopted as a final amendment to the Long-term council community plan.
A
division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Motion: |
Against the Motion: |
|
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor, Cr Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor, Dick Hubbard
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr Doug Armstrong
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills |
Cr Linda Leighton and Cr Richard Simpson were absent.
The
motion was declared CARRIED by 12 votes to 6.
TREASURY MANAGEMENT POLICY
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
That
the Treasury Management Policy, incorporating the liability management policy
and investment policy, be adopted as a final amendment to Auckland City
Council's Long-term Plan 2006-2016, subject to any changes to the sustainable
debt policy that may be agreed at this meeting.
CARRIED
PROPOSED FEE INCREASE -
AUCKLAND CITY ENVIRONMENTS AND CITY PLANNING
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
- That the proposed increases to fees as set out in appendix one to the
report entitled "proposed fee increase - Auckland City Environments and City
Planning" by the Group managers Auckland City Environments and City Planning,
dated 6 June 2007, be approved as follows:
Schedule of fees and charges
- Building control
|
Category |
Fee type |
Fees 1 July 2007 $
|
|
Blasting |
Blasting
permit |
33 |
|
Building
code certificate |
Liquor and
brothel licence applications (fee in addition to the brothel licence
application fee) |
280 |
|
Building
code certificate |
Liquor and
brothel licence applications - each additional inspection |
102 |
|
Building
consent processing - certifier consents |
Certifier
consents - no exclusions |
65 |
|
Building
consent processing - certifier consents |
Certifier
consents - with exclusions |
116 |
|
Building
inspections |
Standard
(up to 40 minutes) |
102 |
|
Building
inspections |
Final or
cladding inspection |
162 |
|
Certificate of acceptance |
|
Deposit
949 |
|
Certificate of compliance |
Where
application does not fit within standard fees |
Deposit
293 |
|
Certificate of public use |
Rates are
the same as for code compliance certificates |
|
|
Code
compliance certificate |
Code
compliance certificate - where final inspection completed more than four
years ago |
404 |
|
Code
compliance certificate |
Code
compliance certificate - work < $2,000 |
63 |
|
Code
compliance certificate |
Code
compliance certificate - work $2,001-$20,000 |
165 |
|
Code
compliance certificate |
Code
compliance certificate - work $20,001-$250,000 |
219 |
|
Code
compliance certificate |
Code
compliance certificate - work $250,001-$500,000 |
523 |
|
Code
compliance certificate |
Code
compliance certificate - work > $500,000 |
At cost |
|
Compliance
schedules |
Compliance
schedule - administration fee |
158 |
|
Compliance
schedules |
Compliance
schedule - per feature |
57 |
|
Department
of Building and Housing accreditation levy |
|
20 cents
per $1,000 worth of work |
|
Disconnection of fire alarm |
Disconnection fee |
242 |
|
Exempt
building work |
|
144 |
|
Extension
of building consent |
Application to extend the time a building consent is valid |
124 |
|
Hoarding |
Per square
metre |
97 |
|
Hoisting |
Hoisting
over footpath or public place (mobile crane or other hoisting device) -
full day |
129 |
|
Hoisting |
Hoisting
over footpath or public place (mobile crane or other hoisting device) -
half day |
65 |
|
Hoisting |
Hoisting
over footpath or public place (mobile crane or other hoisting device) -
per month |
425 |
|
Hoisting |
Hoisting
over footpath or public place (mobile crane or other hoisting device) -
per week |
212 |
|
Independently qualified person - application for acceptance as
(three-year period) |
Base fee
(also renewal fee) |
67 |
|
Independently qualified person - application for acceptance as
(three-year period) |
Charge per
system or feature for which acceptance is sought |
80 |
|
Independently qualified person register |
Independently qualified person register - charge per copy |
24 |
|
Lapsing a
building consent |
One hour
processing time and half an hour administration at current hourly rates |
161 |
|
Liquor
licence fees |
Liquor
building certificate (building code certificate) |
73 |
|
Notice to
fix |
Associated
with a live building consent - from 1 July 2007 the fee will include two
hours' processing time, half an hour to serve notice, and two hours to
follow up and close up |
162b> |
|
Notice to
fix |
Not
associated with a live building consent (includes evacuation of
dangerous buildings) - from 1 July 2007 the fee will include two hours'
processing time, half an hour to serve notice, two hours to follow up
and close up, plus two final inspections and the cost of further
follow-up inspections |
162 |
|
Plumbing
consents |
Pre-paid
plumbing consents (Enerco hot water cylinder installation) - book of 10 |
792/b> |
|
Producer
statements |
Work over
the value $1 million |
283 |
|
Producer
statements |
Work up to
the value $1 million |
176 |
|
Project
information memorandum |
Without a
building consent application |
241 |
|
Project
information memorandum |
With a
building consent application |
93 |
|
Project
information memorandum |
Illegal
building work - two hours at current hourly rates |
248 |
|
Project
information memorandum - solid fuel heaters |
|
93/b> |
|
Scaffolds |
Scaffold
permit per 20m of street frontage for each month |
145 |
|
Section 72 |
|
151/b> |
|
Special
inspection reports |
Safe and
sanitary |
241 |
|
Special
inspection reports |
Other |
At cost |
|
Swimming
pools inspection - existing pools |
Swimming
pool exemptions |
733 |
|
Swimming
pools inspection - existing pools |
Swimming
pool inspections (and re-inspections) - existing pools (from the third
inspection) |
190 |
|
Swimming
pools inspection - new pools |
Standard
fees for building consents apply |
|
|
Temporary
building work |
Exempt
work |
144 |
|
Temporary
building work |
Non-exempt
work |
144 |
|
Tie backs |
Temporary
tie backs per metre of frontage |
84 |
|
Use of
street |
Use of
street for building operations, annual fee per square metre of street
air space, plus 50 per cent of base fee per additional occupied level -
central area |
97b> |
|
Use of
street |
Use of
street for building operations, annual fee per square metre of street
air space, plus 50 per cent of base fee per additional occupied level -
other areas |
33 |
|
Vehicle
crossing permit |
Vehicle
crossing permit |
220 |
|
Waivers |
Application for waivers (deposit) |
475 |
|
Warrant of
fitness |
Receipt,
processing and issue of building warrant of fitness |
105 |
|
Building consent categories O, P, Q, R, S |
Fees 1 July 2007 $ |
|
Estimated value of building work $ |
With producer statement
|
Without producer statement |
|
500,001 -
1,000,000 |
597 |
1,129 |
|
Additional
for every 500,000 increment over 1,000,000 |
33 |
290 |
- Building consent processing
The
fee for a building consent is calculated by adding together the components of
the application. All fees are in dollars.
|
Project category
(see below) |
To lodge |
Admin |
Planning check |
Building processing |
Records |
BRANZ |
DBH levy |
Drainage design |
Building over public drain |
Assess drainage video1 |
Flood report |
Pump station |
Structural engineering |
Geo- technical engineering |
Fire engineering |
|
A |
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
82 |
|
42 |
62 |
35 |
|
|
76 |
151 |
151 |
113 |
366 |
76 |
76 |
76 |
|
C |
82 |
82 |
140 |
124 |
53 |
|
|
151 |
151 |
151 |
113 |
366 |
76 |
76 |
76 |
|
D |
82 |
82 |
140 |
248 |
53 |
|
|
151 |
151 |
151 |
113 |
366 |
76 |
76 |
76 |
|
E |
82 |
82 |
140 |
62 |
53 |
|
|
151 |
151 |
151 |
113 |
366 |
151 |
302 |
76 |
|
F |
82 |
82 |
140 |
248 |
53 |
|
|
151 |
151 |
151 |
113 |
366 |
302 |
302 |
302 |
|
G |
82 |
82 |
140 |
248 |
53 |
Levy applies above $20,000 |
151 |
151 |
151 |
113 |
366 |
302 |
302 |
151 |
|
H |
82 |
82 |
140 |
371 |
73 |
|
|
151 |
151 |
151 |
302 |
366 |
604 |
302 |
302 |
|
I |
82 |
82 |
140 |
371 |
90 |
|
|
227 |
151 |
151 |
302 |
366 |
604 |
302 |
151 |
|
J |
124 |
82 |
140 |
495 |
90 |
|
|
227 |
151 |
151 |
302 |
366 |
755 |
302 |
302 |
|
K |
124 |
82 |
280 |
495 |
73 |
|
|
227 |
151 |
151 |
302 |
366 |
453 |
302 |
151 |
|
L |
124 |
82 |
280 |
619 |
73 |
|
|
227 |
151 |
151 |
302 |
366 |
604 |
302 |
151 |
|
M |
82 |
82 |
280 |
371 |
90 |
|
|
302 |
151 |
151 |
302 |
366 |
604 |
302 |
151 |
|
N |
124 |
82 |
280 |
743 |
109 |
|
|
378 |
151 |
151 |
378 |
366 |
755 |
302 |
453 |
|
T |
82 |
|
42 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U |
82 |
|
|
116 |
73 |
|
|
|
151 |
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to table above
All
fees are in dollars, include GST and are effective from 1 July 2007.
Categories O, P, Q, R and S are excluded from standard fees and will be subject
to an estimate or deposit plus invoice. 1 The assess drainage video fee is for one line. The fee for each
subsequent line is $73.
- Building consent categories
- minor consent
- building work up to the value of $2,000
- kit-set carports and garages
- residential swimming pool and fencing
- all other building work valued $2,001 to $5,000
- all other building work valued $5,001 to $19,999
- residential alterations and additions valued $20,000 to $99,000
- commercial building work valued $20,000 to $99,000 (BRANZ and BIA levy
starts in this category)
- residential alterations and additions valued $100,000 to $250,000
- commercial building work valued $100,000 to $250,000
- new dwelling (standard)
- new dwelling (executive)
- attached dwellings
- commercial buildings and residential alterations valued $250,001 to
$499,999
- commercial buildings and residential alterations valued $500,000 to
$1,000,000
- buildings valued over $1,000,000
- change of use and earthquake-prone buildings
- amendments to current consents
- staged consents
- house removals
- certifiers - no exclusions
- certifiers - with exclusions.
- Building consent deposits Hauraki Gulf islands
|
Value of work |
Deposit at 1 July 2007 $
|
|
Up to
$5,000 |
201 |
|
$5,001 -
$25,000 |
339 |
|
$25,001 -
$50,000 |
411 |
|
$50,001 -
$100,000 |
533 |
|
$100,001 -
$150,000 |
581 |
|
$150,001 -
$250,000 |
742 |
|
$250,001 -
$500,000 |
790 |
Notes
to table above
The
total cost of the consent will be calculated on a time and cost basis using the
approved hourly rates.
Plan
checks will be charged at the rate charged for consents in the Auckland isthmus.
- Environmental health
|
Category |
Subcategory |
Fees 1 July 2007 $ |
|
All licences |
New premise application |
124 |
|
Brothel licence |
Annual fee |
566 |
|
Building consent checks |
|
Charged at hourly rates |
|
Camping grounds |
Application |
346 |
|
Camping grounds |
Renewal |
315 |
|
Camping grounds |
Transfer |
63 |
|
Display of goods outside shops |
Permit |
61 |
|
Fee for re-inspection - health |
Charged at hourly rates |
|
|
Food premise licence |
Re-grading |
50 per cent of annual fee |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small low risk A grade |
231 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small low risk B grade |
300 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small low risk D grade |
369 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small low risk E grade |
462 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large low risk A grade |
346 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large low risk B grade |
451 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large low risk D grade |
554 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large low risk E grade |
692 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small medium risk A grade |
462 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small medium risk B grade |
600 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small medium risk D grade |
739 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small medium risk E grade |
923 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large medium risk A grade |
692 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large medium risk B grade |
900 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large medium risk D grade |
1,108 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large medium risk E grade |
1,385 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small high risk A grade |
692 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small high risk B grade |
900 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small high risk D grade |
1,108 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Small high risk E grade |
1,385 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large high risk A grade |
1,039 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large high risk B grade |
1,350 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large high risk D grade |
1,662 |
|
Food premise licence annual fee |
Large high risk E grade |
2,077 |
|
Food stalls |
Food stalls - one month |
124 |
|
Food stalls |
Food stalls - six months |
173 |
|
Food stalls |
Food stalls - annual |
288 |
|
Food stalls |
Food stalls - day |
25 |
|
Funeral directors - mortuary licence |
Annual fee |
346 |
|
Hairdressers |
Hairdressers - transfer fee |
63 |
|
Hairdressers |
Hairdressers all premises per annum |
160 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Bulk tank demolished |
122 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Bulk tank for repair and maintenance |
122 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Bulk tank installed |
143 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Class 2 gas installation (other) |
91 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
CNG storage cylinders installed |
122 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Inspection of any dangerous goods area |
91 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
LPG storage tank installed |
122 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
LPG/CNG equipment installed |
60 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Maintenance of pipe work |
60 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Oil burning equipment - installation |
79 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Oil burning equipment - maintenance |
60 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Pump installed and re-located |
60 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Pump removal |
40 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Pump replaced or fixed |
60 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Storage tank installed |
123 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Storage tank replaced |
143 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Tank removal |
79 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Test pipelines to bulk installations |
91 |
|
Hazardous substances - inspections |
Transfer or copy of any licence |
44 |
|
Health and bathhouse |
|
231 |
|
Health protection licence |
Basic (single process) |
162 |
|
Health protection licence |
Multi basic (multiple processes) |
231 |
|
Health protection licence |
High risk (involving skin penetration) |
231 |
|
Hourly rate for festival events |
|
124 |
|
Inspection fee |
|
124 |
|
Mobile food vendor fee |
|
25 |
|
Mobile food - bun runner |
|
25 |
|
Offensive trades |
Application - annual |
288 |
|
Offensive trades |
Renewal |
288 |
|
Street trading |
Cafe seating on pavement - fee per chair |
5 |
|
Street trading |
Charity or fundraising stalls |
no charge |
|
Street trading |
Long-term trading in a public place (over 12 months) - permit and
monthly fee set within criteria |
157 |
|
Street trading |
Short-term trading in a public place (up to 12 months) - permit and
monthly fee set within criteria |
105 |
|
Street trading |
Hawkers |
28 |
|
Street trading |
Mobile shops |
136 |
|
Transfer fee - all licences |
|
69 |
- Property information
|
Category |
Fee Type |
Fees 1 July 2007 $
|
|
Aerials |
GIS plots - colour aerials - 1997 |
30 |
|
Faxes |
Faxes to Great Barrier Island - one to five pages (per page) |
0.60 |
|
Faxes |
Faxes to Great Barrier Island - six to 10 pages (per page) |
0.40 |
|
Faxes |
Receiving faxes from Great Barrier Island (per page) |
0.40 |
|
LIMS |
Standard LIM (five days) |
232 |
|
LIMS |
Urgent LIM (four hours) |
298 |
|
Print and copy |
A3 EDMS or microfilm |
4 |
|
Print and copy |
Coin operated photocopier A3 |
0.50 |
|
Print and copy |
Coin operated photocopier A4 |
0.30 |
|
Print and copy |
Email of site file (one item) |
Applicable copy price |
|
GIS maps |
Public drainage, water services and contours on one map |
40 |
|
GIS maps |
A contours map, public drainage map and special features map on the same
map for the same property |
49 |
|
Site information charge |
Site information charge - for each site researched (assisted by staff
for up to 15 minutes). Thereafter charged on a time and cost basis |
25 |
|
Site information charge |
Site information charge - for each site researched (self service) |
12.50 |
- Bonds
|
Bonds |
Fees 1 July 2007 $
|
|
Processing bond applications relating to subdivision consent, including
return of money on satisfactory completion of work |
Deposit 799 |
|
Application fee for bond relating to a land use consent (this is the
base fee, the actual charge may be greater depending on legal inputs) |
621 |
|
Administration of a bond relating to a land-use consent, including
release of the bond |
597 |
|
Additional costs from reporting to the appropriate council committee
about bonds for works of over $50,000 |
Actual time at staff charge-out rates |
|
Processing an application to extend the time limit on an existing bond |
107 |
|
Processing an application for the partial release of a bond |
332 |
|
Additional costs relating to a bond that is defaulted on |
Actual time at staff charge-out rates |
- City planning - land use CBD
|
|
|
Fees from 1 July 2007 $ |
|
Resource consent and private plan change applications |
|
|
|
Planning staff, except assistant planners |
|
140/hour |
|
Assistant planners |
|
99/hour |
|
Secretarial, administration and support staff |
|
81/hour |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits for resource consent applications |
|
|
|
Level one application fee (simple, certificate of compliance, trees) |
|
920 |
|
Level two deposit (standard but more complex) |
|
3,139 |
|
Level three deposit (notified - up to five residential units) |
|
6,000 |
|
Level four deposit (notified - >5 and <15 residential units) |
|
12,000 |
|
Level five deposit (notified - >15 residential units) |
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits for plan change applications |
|
|
|
On lodgement |
|
5,023 |
|
Plus, if council agrees to process (minor) |
|
1,412 |
|
Plus, if council agrees to process (major) |
|
12,557 |
- Engineering
|
Category |
Fee type |
Fees 1 July 2007
$000 |
|
Drainage |
Drainage |
Deposit 1,451 |
|
Engineering approvals |
Up to two lots |
Deposit 580 |
|
Engineering approvals |
Three to five lots |
Deposit 1,160 |
|
Engineering approvals |
6 to 10 lots |
Deposit 3,625 |
|
Engineering approvals |
11 to 20 lots |
Deposit 5,076 |
|
Engineering approvals |
21 to 50 lots |
Deposit 10,152 |
|
Engineering approvals |
51 lots or over |
Deposit 14,534 |
|
Producer statements |
Engineering related - per producer statement |
50 |
|
Right of way |
Engineering design right of way or jointly owned driveway |
Deposit 400 |
|
Section 36 |
Section 36 fee |
82 |
- Hourly rates - Auckland City Environments staff
|
|
Rates 1 July 2007 $ |
|
Planners, subdivision staff, licensing staff |
140 |
|
Engineering staff |
155 |
|
Building officers, building inspectors, incident investigators, resource
consent monitoring staff, environmental health officers |
124 |
|
Secretarial and administrative staff |
74 |
- Land use Hauraki Gulf islands (HGI)
|
Fee type |
Fees 1 July 2007 $
|
|
Section 127 Resource Management Act 1991 variation or cancellation |
1,000 |
|
Section 125 Resource Management Act 1991 - to extend the period a
consent is valid |
1,000 |
|
Non-notified land use consent (controlled activities) |
Deposit 600 |
|
Non-notified land use consent (discretionary and non-complying
activities) |
Deposit 1,000 |
|
Notified applications |
Deposit 6,000 |
|
Confirmation of compliance certificate (Resource Management Act 1991) |
Deposit 500 |
- Land use Auckland isthmus
|
Category |
Fee type |
Fees 1 July 2007 $
|
|
Land use isthmus |
Non-notified developments up to five units (excluding on the Hauraki
Gulf islands) - the total cost charged on a time cost basis using hourly
rates |
Deposit 1,600 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Deposit for non-notified consent for developments of more than five
units, and up to and including 15 units (excluding on the Hauraki Gulf
islands) - the total cost is charged on a time-cost basis using hourly
rates |
Deposit 2,000 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Deposit for non-notified consent for developments of more than 15 units
(excluding on the Hauraki Gulf islands) - the total cost is charged on a
time-cost basis using the hourly rates |
Deposit 3,000 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Notified - developments up to five units |
Deposit 6,000 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Deposit for notified consents - developments of more than five units,
and up to and including 15 units |
Deposit 12,000 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Deposit for notified consents - developments of more than 15 units |
Deposit 18,000 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Outline plans or drawings lodged for consideration - total cost charged
on a time cost basis using approved hourly rates |
Deposit 1,000 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Monitoring fee |
Charged at hourly rates |
|
Land use isthmus |
Existing use rights assessment - central area |
1,036 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Existing use rights assessment - other areas |
Deposit 500 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Confirmation of compliance certificate (Resource Management Act 1991) |
Deposit 500 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Consent to dispensation or exemption or non-compliance with Auckland
City Council's consolidated bylaw 1991 |
Deposit 1,000 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Section 127 Resource Management Act 1991 variation or cancellation |
1,000 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Section 125 Resource Management Act 1991 - to extend the period a
consent is valid |
1,000 |
|
Land use isthmus |
Lodging an objection under section 357 of the Resource Management Act
1991 |
No charge |
|
Overseas investment certificate |
Required by overseas investors to confirm the property meets the
council's requirements |
290 |
|
Special inspections reports |
Planning and building |
At cost |
|
Liquor licence fees |
Liquor planning certificate |
146 |
- Animal control
|
Fee type |
Fees 1 July 2007 $
|
|
Application after 31 July 2007 |
Plus 50 per cent |
|
National dog database levy - fee per registration |
2 |
|
Class A - neutered dog with dog owner licence |
60 (although if the renewal is paid before 31 July 2007, the fee is 40) |
|
Class B - neutered dog |
98 (although if the renewal is paid before 31 July 2007, the fee is 65) |
|
Class C - un-neutered dog with dog owner licence |
127 (although if the renewal is paid before 31 July 2007, the fee is 85) |
|
Class D - un-neutered dog without dog owner licence |
167 (although if the renewal is paid before 31 July 2007, the fee is
111) |
|
Class E - special purpose dog |
No fee |
|
Class F - working dog |
60 (although if the renewal is paid before 31 July 2007, the fee is 40) |
|
Dangerous dogs |
Fee plus 150 per cent of fee |
|
Permit to keep more than one dog |
47 |
|
Probationary owners |
As in classes A to F |
|
Replacement disc |
7 |
|
Small animal impounding (rabbits, ferrets, fowl) |
26 |
|
Impounding - sustenance fee (small animal) per day |
7 |
|
Impounding - sustenance fee per day (stock) |
20 |
|
Driving or leading fee |
40 |
|
Stock impounding fee |
40 |
|
First impounding - registered dog |
33 |
|
First impounding - unregistered dog |
59 |
|
Second impounding - registered dog |
59 |
|
Second impounding - unregistered dog |
111 |
|
Third impounding - registered dog |
111 |
|
Third impounding - unregistered dog |
189 |
|
Sustenance for each day or part day of dog impoundment |
18 |
|
Additional fees for after hours-impoundment - registered dog |
20 |
|
Additional fees for after hours-impoundment - unregistered dog |
33 |
|
Impounding - surrender fee |
26 |
|
Impounding - return to owner fee (transport) |
14 |
- Miscellaneous
|
Category |
Fee type |
Fees 1 July 2007
$ |
|
Street banners |
Application fee |
133 |
- Subdivision
|
Consent type |
Fees 1 July 2007 $
|
|
Boundary adjustment |
Deposit 636 |
|
Completion certificate (section 224C of the Resource Management Act
1991) simple (no engineering input required) |
167 |
|
Completion certificate (section 224C of the Resource Management Act
1991) complex (engineering input required) |
Deposit 479 |
|
Freehold subdivision of existing or approved complying development |
Deposit 950 |
|
Freehold subdivision of new vacant lots |
Deposit 1,500 |
|
Freehold subdivision of existing or approved development with
development control modifications, eg height in relation to boundary,
coverage etc |
Deposit 1,500 |
|
Right of way |
391 |
|
Survey plan |
263 |
|
Unit title |
Deposit 972 |
|
Variations and amendments |
Deposit 1,500 |
|
Cross-lease - first stage |
Deposit 1,500 |
|
Cross-lease - any subsequent stage |
Deposit 674 |
|
Deposit for combined application for land use consent and subdivision
consent |
Deposit 2,000 |
|
Removing building line restrictions, creating easement certificate,
cancelling easements, amalgamating certificates of title, creating unit
title certificate (section 5(1)(g) the Resource Management Act 1991) |
350 |
- That it be noted that the Auckland City Environments and City Planning
fee increases raise compliance costs for citizens and every endeavour must be
made to minimise these costs within an acceptable risk framework.
A
division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Motion: |
Against the Motion: |
|
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Doug Armstrong
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor, Cr Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Noelene Raffills
Cr Penny Sefuiva
His Worship the Mayor, Dick Hubbard
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Faye Storer |
Cr Linda Leighton and Cr Richard Simpson were absent.
The
motion was declared CARRIED by 15 votes to 3.
That
items 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17 be considered at this point.
CARRIED
ESTABLISHMENT OF A JOINT
VENTURE WITH BRITOMART GROUP
Secretarial Note:
This
item was considered after the confidential item relating to this matter.
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
- That Auckland City Council enter a 50:50 joint venture with Britomart
Group to own and operate the Britomart carpark as proposed in the Statement of
Proposal included in the Auckland City Council draft Annual Plan 2007/2008 and
attached in appendix one of the report entitled "Establishment of a joint
venture with Britomart Group" by the Development Analyst dated 15 June 2007.
- That the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Chairperson of the Finance and
Corporate Business Committee review and approve the final terms of the variation
to the Development Deed, joint venture documentation and other necessary legal
documentation to complete the transaction.
CARRIED
Councillor Caughey requested her vote against the above resolution be recorded.
CONSULTATION AND HEARINGS
PROCESS FOR THE 2007/2008 DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN
The
Chairman moved:
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
That
following consideration of both written and oral submissions on the draft
2007/2008 Annual Plan, Council believes due consideration has been given to the
various requests over the deliberation period, and accordingly resolves:
- That the schedule of reports requested for committees contained within
Appendix B of the report from the Democracy Advisor, dated 12 June 2007, be
confirmed.
- That the schedule of individual submitter responses to the draft
annual plan be adopted, noting that the schedule will be updated to reflect any
decisions emanating from the 21 June 2007 Combined Committees meeting.
- That
the report on Metrowater that has already been requested to go to the Annual
Plan Direction Setting meeting in November 2007 include consideration of:
- The
possibility of implementing progressive pricing with a lower level of pricing
for an appropriate amount of water use and a higher price per unit of water
above that level.
- The
possibility of Metrowater having responsibility for stormwater assets and
maintenance with an appropriate level of bulk funding from Council for this
purpose.
- Metrowater's policy and City Council involvement in decisions to restrict, and
remove restrictions on water supply.
- The
possibility of Metrowater's wastewater charges being bulk funded by Council.
- Whether
proposed charitable payments should be reduced or eliminated in future years.
- The
implications for Council's overall revenue and budget of any changes in Council
income from Metrowater.
- The
other issues listed in resolution of the Finance and Corporate Business
Committee on 23 May 2007 being:
E. That a specific report on Metrowater Statement of Intent be prepared
for the Annual Plan Direction Setting meeting in November to include:
- Return on public investment via a charitable payment mechanism from
the 2008/2009 year onwards
- Taxation issues
- The synergy (present and future) between stormwater expenditure and Metrowater's (present and future) especially the case for Metrowater assuming
more responsibility for stormwater
- The effect of conservation (lower per capita consumption) on water
prices
- Metrowater's customer pricing model
- Any other issues including legislative implications.
Councillor Abel moved the following amendment:
That Metro Water Limited be structured as a council controlled Stand Alone
Business Unit (SABU).
Note:
Metro Water Limited is currently a Charitable Local Authority Trading Enterprise
(LATE) and subject to income tax.
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Dr Cathy Casey |
Cr Doug Armstrong
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor, Cr Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Noelene Raffills
Cr Penny Sefuiva
His Worship the Mayor, Dick Hubbard
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr Faye Storer abstained from voting.
Cr Linda Leighton and Cr Richard Simpson were absent.
The motion was declared LOST by 15 votes to 2, with 1 abstention.
Councillor Armstrong moved the following amendment to replace C(iv):
- The possibility of Metrowater's wastewater charges being bulk funded
by Council, whilst ensuring that the charges continue to be funded on a
user pays basis.
The amendment was put by a show of hands and declared LOST by 10 votes to 7.
Councillor Millar moved the following amendment to replace C:
- That the report on Metrowater that has already been requested to go to
the Annual Plan Direction Setting meeting in November 2007 be undertaken by
an independent professional, to be made public, and include consideration
of:
- The possibility of implementing progressive pricing with a lower
level of pricing for an appropriate amount of water use and a higher
price per unit of water above that level.
- The possibility of Metrowater having responsibility for stormwater
assets and maintenance with an appropriate level of bulk funding from
Council for this purpose.
- Metrowater's policy and City Council involvement in decisions to
restrict, and remove restrictions on water supply.
- The possibility of Metrowater's wastewater charges being bulk funded
by Council.
- Whether proposed charitable payments should be reduced or eliminated
in future years.
- The implications for Council's overall revenue and budget of any
changes in Council income from Metrowater.
- The other issues listed in resolution of the Finance and Corporate
Business Committee on 23 May 2007 being:
- That a specific report on Metrowater Statement of Intent be
prepared for the Annual Plan Direction Setting meeting in November
to include:
- Return on public investment via a charitable payment
mechanism from the 2008/2009 year onwards
- Taxation issues
- The synergy (present and future) between stormwater
expenditure and Metrowater's (present and future) especially the
case for Metrowater assuming more responsibility for stormwater
- The effect of conservation (lower per capita consumption) on
water prices
- Metrowater's customer pricing model
- Any other issues including legislative implications.
A division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr Doug Armstrong
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills
Cr Faye Storer |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor, Cr Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
His Worship the Mayor, Dick Hubbard
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr Linda Leighton and Cr Richard Simpson were absent.
The amendment was declared LOST by 11 votes to 7.
The Chairman put the following substantive motion:
That it be a recommendation to Council:
That following consideration of both written and oral submissions on the draft
2007/2008 Annual Plan, Council believes due consideration has been given to the
various requests over the deliberation period, and accordingly resolves:
- That the schedule of reports requested for committees contained
within Appendix B of the report from the Democracy Advisor, dated 12 June
2007, be confirmed.
- That the schedule of individual submitter responses to the draft annual
plan be adopted, noting that the schedule will be updated to reflect any
decisions emanating from the 21 June 2007 Combined Committees meeting.
- That the report on Metrowater that has already been requested to go
to the Annual Plan Direction Setting meeting in November 2007 include
consideration of:
- The possibility of implementing progressive pricing with a lower
level of pricing for an appropriate amount of water use and a higher
price per unit of water above that level.
- The possibility of Metrowater having responsibility for stormwater
assets and maintenance with an appropriate level of bulk funding from
Council for this purpose.
- Metrowater's policy and City Council involvement in decisions to
restrict, and remove restrictions on water supply.
- The possibility of Metrowater's wastewater charges being bulk
funded by Council.
- Whether proposed charitable payments should be reduced or eliminated
in future years.
- The implications for Council's overall revenue and budget of any
changes in Council income from Metrowater.
- The other issues listed in resolution of the Finance and Corporate
Business Committee on 23 May 2007 being:
- That a specific report on Metrowater Statement of Intent be
prepared for the Annual Plan Direction Setting meeting in November
to include:
- Return on public investment via a charitable payment
mechanism from the 2008/2009 year onwards
- Taxation issues
- The synergy (present and future) between stormwater
expenditure and Metrowater's (present and future) especially the
case for Metrowater assuming more responsibility for stormwater
- The effect of conservation (lower per capita consumption) on
water prices
- Metrowater's customer pricing model
- Any other issues including legislative implications.
CARRIED
RATING POLICIES
RATES POLICY FOR 2007/2008
The
Chairman moved:
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
- That the overall citywide rate increase be 3.6% (5.4% for residential
properties) to fund the budget for 2007/2008 recommended as outlined in the
separate report in this agenda entitled "Update on budgets for 2007/2008",
consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan.
- That the $95
uniform annual general charge (UAGC) for 2007/2008 be retained; as consulted on
in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan.
- That the next
step of the general rate differential strategy be applied in 2007/2008, as
consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan.
- That the
central business district (CBD) targeted rate for the CBD non-residential group
be increased to match the group's reduction in the general rate, which results
from implementing the next step in the long-term differential strategy for the
general rate, consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan. The targeted rate
will be assessed on annual value and will generate revenue of $8.3 million (GST
exclusive) for 2007/2008.
- That the
central business district (CBD) targeted rate to apply to CBD residential
ratepayers continue to be applied as a fixed charge of $52 (including GST) per
residential unit for 2007/2008, as consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual
plan.
- That the
citywide targeted rate for refuse collection be increased to $199 per service
for 2007/2008 to cover the increases in the existing refuse services and fund
the waste minimisation initiatives adopted to speed up achieving the vision.
- That a new
remission policy be introduced from 2007/2008 to apply in two parts:
- That $152
for the cost of the rubbish service component and the biennial inorganic
collection be remitted from the refuse collection targeted rate for large
residential blocks that have an approved alternative rubbish collection service.
- That an additional $27 for the cost of the recycling service be
remitted for large residential blocks that have an approved recycling service.
- That the
discount rate for early payment of rates for 2007/2008 be set at 2.83%; this
will be applied to 2007/2008 rates paid in full by the first rate instalment
date [a discount rate of 2.83% is equivalent to an 11.19% return to the
ratepayers (before tax)], as consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan.
- That the five targeted rates for city development, transport, open
spaces and volcanic cones; community development and housing; and heritage and
urban design, be changed to generate the following revenues in 2007/2008:
- City development from $3.5 million to $2.4 million (-30.8% decrease,
as the strategic asset fund will fund some of these projects in 2007/2008).
- Transport from $15.7 million to $21.5 million (36.6% increase).
- Open spaces and volcanic cones from $3.0 million to $3.5 million
(16.6% increase).
- Heritage and urban design from $1.5 million to $1.6 million (9.6%
increase).
- Community development and housing from $2.4 million to $4.3 million
(77.3% increase).
- That the Mainstreet budgets for 2007/2008 be noted as approved under item 16 of the 21
June 2007 Combined Committees minutes.
- That the text
for the rating policy statements (provided separately in the 21 June 2007
Combined Committees agenda under item 17.2) be included in the funding impact
statement for the final 2007/2008 annual plan.
- That the four rates instalment dates for the 2007/2008 financial year
be confirmed as:
- 20 August 2007
- 20 November 2007
- 20 February 2008
- 20 May 2008
The
instalment dates are included in section K of the rates resolution in Appendix 1
of the addendum report entitled 'Rates Policy for 2007/2008 - Rates
Resolution' by the Finance and Revenue Strategy Manager, dated 18 June 2007.
- That a 10 per cent penalty for late rates payments for the 2007/2008
financial year be approved. The rates penalty regime for the 2007/2008 financial
year is included in section L of the rates resolution in Appendix 1 of the
addendum report entitled 'Rates Policy for 2007/2008 - Rates Resolution'
by the Finance and revenue strategy manager, dated 18 June 2007.
- That the rates resolution for the 2007/2008 financial
year be adopted, which is attached as Appendix 1 to the addendum report entitled
'Rates Policy for 2007/2008 - Rates Resolution' by the Finance and
revenue strategy manager dated, 18 June 2007.
Councillor Caughey moved the following amendment to replace resolution B:
- That the uniform annual general charge (UAGC) for 2007/2008 be
doubled to $190.
A
division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr Doug Armstrong
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Faye Storer |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor, Cr Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
His Worship the Mayor, Dick Hubbard
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr Linda Leighton, Cr Noelene Raffills and Cr Richard Simpson were absent.
The
amendment was declared LOST by 9 votes to 8.
Councillor Milne moved the following amendment to replace resolution B with:
- That in the interest of fairness the 3.6% average rate increase be
collected by an increase in the uniform annual general charge (UAGC) for
2007/2008 noting that up to 30% of rates can be collected by way of a UAGC and
that Auckland City Council's UAGC is lower than other comparable cities.
A
division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr Doug Armstrong
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills
Cr Faye Storer |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor, Cr Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Richard Northey
Cr Penny Sefuiva
His Worship the Mayor, Dick Hubbard
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr Linda Leighton and Cr Richard Simpson were absent.
The
amendment was declared LOST by 10 votes to 8.A division was called for
Councillor Fryer moved the following amendment to replace resolution F with:
- That the citywide targeted rate for refuse collection be increased to
$179 per service for 2007/2008 to cover the increases in the existing refuse
services and fund from general rates the waste minimisation initiatives adopted
to speed up achieving the vision.
A
division was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For the Amendment: |
Against the Amendment: |
|
Cr Leila Boyle
Cr Glenda Fryer
Cr Richard Northey |
Cr Neil Abel
Cr Doug Armstrong
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
Cr Christine Caughey
Cr Bill Christian
Cr Dr John Hinchcliff
Deputy Mayor, Cr Dr Bruce Hucker
Cr Toni Millar
Cr Scott Milne
Cr Graeme Mulholland
Cr Noelene Raffills
Cr Penny Sefuiva
Cr Faye Storer
His Worship the Mayor, Dick Hubbard
Cr Vern Walsh |
Cr Linda Leighton and Cr Richard Simpson were absent.
The amendment was
declared LOST by 15 votes to 3.
The Chairman put the
following substantive motion, with A and I being put separately:
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
- That the overall citywide rate increase be 3.6% (5.4% for residential
properties) to fund the budget for 2007/2008 recommended as outlined in the
separate report in this agenda entitled "Update on budgets for 2007/2008",
consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan.
CARRIED
Councillor Millar requested her vote against resolution A be recorded.
- That the $95
uniform annual general charge (UAGC) for 2007/2008 be retained; as consulted on
in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan.
- That the next
step of the general rate differential strategy be applied in 2007/2008, as
consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan.
- That the
central business district (CBD) targeted rate for the CBD non-residential group
be increased to match the group's reduction in the general rate, which results
from implementing the next step in the long-term differential strategy for the
general rate, consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan. The targeted rate
will be assessed on annual value and will generate revenue of $8.3 million (GST
exclusive) for 2007/2008.
- That the
central business district (CBD) targeted rate to apply to CBD residential
ratepayers continue to be applied as a fixed charge of $52 (including GST) per
residential unit for 2007/2008, as consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual
plan.
- That the
citywide targeted rate for refuse collection be increased to $199 per service
for 2007/2008 to cover the increases in the existing refuse services and fund
the waste minimisation initiatives adopted to speed up achieving the vision.
- That a new
remission policy be introduced from 2007/2008 to apply in two parts:
- That $152
for the cost of the rubbish service component and the biennial inorganic
collection be remitted from the refuse collection targeted rate for large
residential blocks that have an approved alternative rubbish collection service.
- That an additional $27 for the cost of the recycling service be
remitted for large residential blocks that have an approved recycling service.
- That the
discount rate for early payment of rates for 2007/2008 be set at 2.83%; this
will be applied to 2007/2008 rates paid in full by the first rate instalment
date [a discount rate of 2.83% is equivalent to an 11.19% return to the
ratepayers (before tax)], as consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 annual plan.
CARRIED
- That the five targeted rates for city development, transport, open
spaces and volcanic cones; community development and housing; and heritage and
urban design, be changed to generate the following revenues in 2007/2008:
- City development from $3.5 million to $2.4 million (-30.8% decrease,
as the strategic asset fund will fund some of these projects in 2007/2008).
- Transport from $15.7 million to $21.5 million (36.6% increase).
- Open spaces and volcanic cones from $3.0 million to $3.5 million
(16.6% increase).
- Heritage and urban design from $1.5 million to $1.6 million (9.6%
increase).
- Community development and housing from $2.4 million to $4.3 million
(77.3% increase).
CARRIED
- That the Mainstreet budgets for 2007/2008 be noted as approved under item 16 of the 21
June 2007 Combined Committees minutes.
- That the text
for the rating policy statements (provided separately in the 21 June 2007
Combined Committees agenda under item 17.2) be included in the funding impact
statement for the final 2007/2008 annual plan.
- That the four rates instalment dates for the 2007/2008 financial year
be confirmed as:
- 20 August 2007
- 20 November 2007
- 20 February 2008
- 20 May 2008
The
instalment dates are included in section K of the rates resolution in Appendix 1
of the addendum report entitled 'Rates Policy for 2007/2008 - Rates
Resolution' by the Financial and revenue strategy manager, dated 18 June
2007.
- That a 10 per cent penalty for late rates payments for the 2007/2008
financial year be approved. The rates penalty regime for the 2007/2008 financial
year is included in section L of the rates resolution in Appendix 1 of the
addendum report entitled 'Rates Policy for 2007/2008 - Rates Resolution'
by the Financial and revenue strategy manager, dated 18 June 2007.
- That the rates resolution for the 2007/2008 financial year be
adopted, which is attached as Appendix 1 to the addendum report entitled 'Rates
Policy for 2007/2008 - Rates Resolution' by the Finance and revenue strategy
manager dated, 18 June 2007.
CARRIED
RATES POSTPONEMENT AND REBATES
SCHEMES FOR 2007/2008
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
- That the budget for the extended rates rebate scheme (ERRS) be reduced
from $850,000 to $350,000 (as reflected in the draft 2007/2008 Annual Plan),
while retaining the existing ERRS criteria.
- That the modified rates postponement policy be adopted, noting the
policy is based solely on the ratepayer's equity in the property which would
allow most ratepayers who own their own home to have access to the scheme.
CARRIED
RURAL AND HAURAKI GULF RATING
ISSUES
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
That
the following policies that were consulted on in the draft 2007/2008 Annual Plan
be adopted as follows:
- A remission policy for private land voluntarily covenanted under the QEII National Trust Act (a 100% remission for the covenanted portion of land).
- A postponement policy for commercial farmland (a postponement of 25%
of the rates for farms over 12 hectares that are GST registered - written off
after five years if the property use remains the same).
- A postponement policy for Great Barrier Island commercial properties
(on the difference between the rates based on rateable value and the rates based
on 80% of annual rental - written off after five years if property use remains
the same).
CARRIED
REMISSION OF RATES ON MAORI
FREEHOLD LAND
The
Chairman moved:
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
That
the Maori freehold land rates remission policy be adopted as follows:
- A full remission of rates be provided on land that is undeveloped.
- A remission of rates on land that is developed and used by iwi
members for non-commercial purposes (such as papakainga housing, community
facilities, marae and associated infrastructure), which would 'cap' the rates
using a low percentile of property values in the city.
Councillor Armstrong moved the following amendment to (i):
That
the Maori freehold land rates remission policy be adopted as follows:
- A full remission of rates be provided on land that is undeveloped
provided the land is available for unrestricted public use.
The
amendment was put by a show of hands and declared LOST by 12 votes to 5.
The
Chairman put the following substantive motion:
That it be a recommendation to Council:
That the Maori freehold land rates remission policy be adopted as follows:
- A full remission of rates be provided on land that is undeveloped.
- A remission of rates on land that is developed and used by iwi
members for non-commercial purposes (such as papakainga housing, community
facilities, marae and associated infrastructure), which would 'cap' the rates
using a low percentile of property values in the city.
CARRIED
MAINSTREET RATES 2007/2008
That it be a recommendation to Council:
- That the following Mainstreet budgets for the 2007/2008 year be
approved and included in the Long-term council community plan for 2006-2016:
|
Mainstreet |
2007/08 |
|
Programme |
Budgets |
|
|
(excl GST) |
|
Avondale |
$96,000 |
|
Blockhouse Bay |
$36,603 |
|
Eden Valley |
$77,500 |
|
Ellerslie |
$74,580 |
|
Glen Innes |
$135,280 |
|
Heart of the City |
$2,852,840 |
|
Karangahape Road |
$225,500 |
|
Mt Eden |
$66,701 |
|
Newmarket |
$860,000 |
|
Onehunga |
$349,920 |
|
Otahuhu |
$330,000 |
|
Panmure |
$302,500 |
|
Parnell |
$268,015 |
|
Ponsonby |
$200,000 |
|
Remuera |
$194,700 |
|
Rosebank |
$165,000 |
|
St Heliers |
$109,000 |
|
Total |
$6,344,139 |
- That the boundaries of all Mainstreet programmes remain the same as
those for the 2006/2007 financial year (Refer to Appendix 1 of the report to
Combined Committees entitled "Mainstreet rates 2007/2008" by the Mainstreet
advisor, dated 24 May 2007).
CARRIED
ANNUAL PLAN DOCUMENT
2007/2008 ANNUAL PLAN AND
AMENDMENTS TO OUR LONG-TERM PLAN 2006-2016
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
- That the Auckland City Council's Annual Plan 2007/2008 be adopted with
the following statements added:
- That the council will take every opportunity to advocate for the
underground rail link from Britomart to Mt Eden.
- That Auckland City Council is a good employer.
- That the Amendments to Auckland City Council's Long-term Plan
2006-2016 document be adopted.
- That it be noted that all submissions raised regarding the content of
the annual plan will be considered by officers when preparing the 2008/2009
annual plan template.
- That the Chairman of the Finance and Corporate Business Committee and
the General Manager Finance be delegated authority to make changes to both the
2007/2008 Annual Plan and the Amendments to Auckland City council's Long-term
plan 2006-2016 documents, that reflect the decisions made at the 21 June
Combined Committees meeting and other minor editorial changes.
CARRIED
That items C1, C2 and 10 be considered at this point.
CARRIED
17.1. 2007/2008 ANNUAL PLAN
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
That
the 2007/2008 Annual Plan document be received subject to amendments made by
Combined Committees at its 21 June 2007 Combined Committees meeting.
CARRIED
17.2. AMENDMENTS TO OUR LONG-TERM PLAN
2006-2016
That
it be a recommendation to Council:
That
the "amendments to the Auckland City Council's Long-term plan 2006-2016"
document be received subject to the amendments made by the Combined Committees
at its 21 June 2007 Combined Committees meeting.
CARRIED
EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC : LOCAL GOVERNMENT
OFFICIAL INFORMATION AND MEETINGS ACT 1987
That
the public be excluded from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this
meeting.
The
general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded,
the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the
specific grounds under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as
follows:
|
Item no. |
General subject of each matter to be considered |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable) |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution |
|
C1 |
Britomart carpark relocation and establishment of a joint venture with
Britomart Group |
Public conduct of matter would be likely to result in disclosure of
information for which good reason to withhold exists under section 7. |
S7(2)(b)(ii)
The withholding of the information is necessary to protect information
where the making available of the information would be likely
unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who
supplied or who is the subject of the information.
In particular, the report contains acquisitions and operating
information which if released to the public would prejudice the joint
ventures' ability to operate commercially.
S7(2)(h)
The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local
authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial
activities.
In particular, the report contains detailed commercial information
relating to a third party, the Britomart Group which if released to the
public would disadvantage their commercial position.
S7(2)(i)
The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local
authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations
(including commercial and industrial negotiations).
In particular, the report contains detailed commercial information,
which if released to the public, would compromise ongoing negotiations. |
S48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result
in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding
exists under section 7. |
|
C2 |
Update on Budgets for 2007/2008 |
Public conduct of matter would be likely to result in disclosure of
information for which good reason to withhold exists under section 7. |
S7(2)(b)(ii)
The withholding of the information is necessary to protect information
where the making available of the information would be likely
unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who
supplied or who is the subject of the information.
In particular the figures stated in this appendix, if released to the
public, would compromise the commercial activities of the Edge and
Auckland Netball that could affect funding negotiations with other
parties.
Section 7(2)(c)(i)
To protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence
or which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the
authority of any enactment, where the making available of the
information would be likely to prejudice the supply of similar
information, or information from the same source, and it is in the
public interest that such information should continue to be supplied.
In particular, there is detailed financial information from the Auckland
Netball Association.
S7(2)(h)
The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local
authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial
activities.
In particular, the report contains ticket pricing, staff and ITC budget
information from the EdgeŽ and other third parties, which if released to
the public, would disadvantage Auckland City Council, the EdgeŽ and
other third parties. This information is subject to potential ongoing
negotiations. |
S48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result
in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding
exists under section 7. |
CARRIED
There
being no further business the Chairman declared the meeting closed at 2.34pm.
|