|
|
|
Council member and meetings
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
PLANNING FIXTURES COMMITTEE
HELD ON TUESDAY, 19 JUNE 2007 AT 11:00 AM
ADJOURNED AT 1.00 PM AND RECONVENED AT 1.05 PM
|
PRESENT: |
Councillors: |
Faye |
Storer |
[Chairman]
[until 1.33 pm, item C1] |
|
|
|
Christine |
Caughey |
[from 11.03 am, item 5.1] |
|
|
|
Bill |
Christian, JP |
[until 11.22 am, item 5.3]
[from 11.24 am, item 5.3]
[until 1.24 pm, item C1]
[from 1.26 pm, item C1
[until 1.33 pm, item C1] |
|
|
|
Glenda |
Fryer |
|
|
|
|
Graeme |
Mulholland, JP |
[until 11.49 am, item 5.3]
[from 11.50 am, item 5.3] |
APOLOGIES
That apologies
from Cr C Caughey for lateness in arriving at the meeting be accepted.
CARRIED
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
That the minutes
of the Planning Fixtures Committee meeting held on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 be
confirmed as a true and correct record.
CARRIED
EXTRAORDINARY BUSINESS
3.1315-375 MT WELLINGTON HIGHWAY, MT WELLINGTON
That an item relating to an appeal by Redwood Group Limited
against Council's decision to refuse consent to construct and operate a bulk
retail centre at 315-375 Mt Wellington Highway, Mt Wellington be considered as
extraordinary business at agenda item C2 as the court has scheduled a settlement
conference for Friday, 22 June 2007 and the next committee meeting is after that
date.
CARRIED
SIGNS BYLAW APPLICATIONS
There were no
Sign Bylaw applications to consider.
RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS AND OTHERS
5.1. 26 WATERTON PLACE, AVONDALE
Pursuant to section 104C of the Resource Management Act
1991, the non-notified Restricted Discretionary activity land use resource
consent application by Leslie Palmer to remove a Banksia at 26 Waterton Place,
Avondale, be granted consent.
Lapsing of consent
Pursuant to section 125 of the Resource Management Act
1991, this resource consent will expire two years after the date of commencement
of consent unless, before the consent lapses;
- The consent is given effect to; or
- An application is made to
the consent authority to extend the period of the consent, and the consent
authority decides to grant an extension after taking into account the statutory
considerations, set out in section 125(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act
1991.
Council considers that because trees are living
organisms, two years is an appropriate timeframe in which to undertake the
works. A longer period is inappropriate as the tree could grow significantly
within this time.
Pursuant to section 113 of the Resource Management Act
1991, the following matters have been taken into account in making the decision
set out above:
Relevant Statutory Provisions
The following provisions of the Resource Management Act
1991 were relevant in the assessment of this application:
- sections 104, 104C and 108 (restricted discretionary
activity)
Relevant Plan Provisions
The relevant planning documents considered were:
Auckland City Operative District Plan 1999 - Isthmus
Section and in particular the following:
- Clause 5C.7.3.3.C (General Tree Protection)
Summary of Evidence
This application was not the subject of a contested
hearing; however, Council has considered the following information:
- The Assessment of Effects prepared by Paul Hansen of
Auckland City Environments
Principal Issues in Contention
The application was not the subject of a contested
hearing. Accordingly, there were no issues in contention.
Main Findings of Fact
The Committee considers that the main 'findings of fact'
are:
- The application relates to the removal of a Generally
Protected Banksia tree located adjacent to the house at 26 Waterton Place,
Avondale.
- The subject site is zoned Residential 5 under the
Auckland City Operative District Plan (1999)
Reasons
The reasons for this restricted discretionary activity
consent are as follows:
- Any adverse environmental
effects of the proposed activity will be no more than minor.
- Granting of consent will
not be inconsistent with the relevant objectives and policies of the District
Plan, or the Act's focus of sustainable management of physical and natural
resources .
- The subject tree has been
topped in the past, which has resulted in a poorer form to the tree and the tree
is located in close proximity to the existing dwelling.
Conditions of Consent
Pursuant to section 108 of the Resource Management Act
1991, this consent is subject to the following conditions:
- All tree work shall be
carried out by a competent arborist/tree surgeon in accordance with accepted
arboricultural practice.
- Prior to the removal of
the tree, the applicant shall plant at least two (2) appropriate replacement
indigenous specimen trees within the property. The trees shall have a minimum
root ball size of pb95 (or an equivalent size) and a minimum height of 1.8
metres at the time of planting. The replacement trees shall be maintained
thereafter.
- The consent holder shall
notify Council's Resource Consent Monitoring Leader in writing when the
replacement planting required as a condition of consent has been completed. This
notification shall include the size, species and location of the replacement
trees (location to be shown on a sketch of the site). Notification can be sent
by fax on 353 9186 attn: Resource Consent Monitoring Leader, or mailed to
Private Bag 92516, Wellesley St, Auckland
ADVICE NOTES
- The applicant needs to
obtain all other necessary consents and permits, including those under the
Building Act 2004, and comply with all relevant Council Bylaws. If the tree/s
to which this consent relates are not located on land owned by the consent
holder, the approval of the tree owner/s or an order to be made by the court
under Section 129C of the Property Law Amendment Act 1952 may need to be
obtained to give effect to the consent.
- A copy of this consent
shall be held on site at all times during work on trees.
- If you disagree with any
of the above conditions you have a right of objection pursuant to section 357 of
the Resource Management Act 1991 which shall be made in writing to Council
within 15 working days of notification of the decision. Council shall as soon as
practicable consider the objection at a hearing.
CARRIED
Note:Crs W A Christian and G Fryer requested that their
vote against the decisionbe recorded.
5.2. 64 WAIMARIE STREET, ST HELIERS
That, pursuant to sections 93 and 94 of the Resource
Management Act 1991, this application be processed without notice because:
- The adverse effects of the activity on the environment
will be minor, and
- There are no persons considered to be adversely
affected by the activity.
That, pursuant to section 94C, there are no special
circumstances to warrant notification.
Pursuant to section 104B of the Resource Management Act
1991, the discretionary activity land use application by Hanayu Limited to
extend the operating hours of an existing restaurant (existing hours of
operation from 5:00pm to 10:00pm, Wednesday to Sunday inclusive) to from 12:00
noon to 2:00pm and from 5:00pm to 11:00pm, Monday to Sunday inclusive, (seven
days per week), that;
- Is a discretionary activity in the Business 1 Zone,
- Creates a car parking shortfall of 11 spaces,
- Creates a loading space shortfall of 1 space,
at 64 Waimarie Street, St Heliers described as PT LOT 12
DP 38088, CT 47C/172 be granted consent.
Pursuant to section 125 of the Resource Management Act
1991, this resource consent will expire five years after the date of
commencement of consent unless, before the consent lapses;
- the consent is given
effect to; or
- an application is made to
the consent authority to extend the period of the consent, and the consent
authority decides to grant an extension after taking into account the statutory
considerations, set out in section 125(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act
1991.
Pursuant to section 113 of the Resource Management Act
1991, the following matters have been taken into account in making the decision
set above:
Relevant Statutory Provisions
The following provisions of the Resource Management Act
1991 were relevant in the assessment of this application;
- sections 104, 104B and 108 (discretionary activity).
Relevant Plan Provisions
The relevant planning documents
considered were:
Auckland City District Plan 1999 - Isthmus Section and in
particular the following;
- Clause 8.6.1 (Business 1 Objectives and Policies),
- Clause 8.7.3.2 (General Criteria for Assessing
Discretionary Activities),
- Clause 12.8.1. (Parking Shortfall Assessment Criteria).
Principal Issues in Contention
The application was not the subject of a contested
hearing as the Council generally concurs with the applicant's assessment.
Accordingly, there were no issues in contention.
Summary of Evidence
This application was not the subject of a contested
hearing. Whilst no evidence has been provided, Council has considered the
following specialists' reports:
- The Assessment of Effects prepared by Sarah Morrison of
CKL Surveys Ltd dated January 2007.
- A 'Traffic Impact Assessment' report prepared by
Geoffrey Brown of G&H Consultants Ltd. dated 19 December 2006.
- A memo prepared by Daniel Winter (Council's
Environmental Health Specialist - Noise), dated 11th June 2007.
Main Findings of Fact
The Committee considers that the
main 'findings of fact' are:
- The proposed extended days and hours of trading for the
restaurant will have only a minor effect on the environment.
- Any increase in parking requirements generated by the
proposal can be accommodated by the existing parking available in near vicinity
to the activity.
- Any increase in traffic generated by the proposed
activity can be accommodated by the existing road network.
- Parking or loading spaces cannot physically be provided
on-site.
- Given the availability of parking in the vicinity, no
specific loading space is necessary.
Reasons for the Decision
The reasons for this discretionary
activity consent are as follows:
- The granting of consent
to the application will have minor effects on the environment. In particular,
the proposal will have minor effects on residential amenity and minor effects
with respect to parking and traffic.
- The granting of consent to
the application is consistent with the relevant assessment criteria for
Discretionary activities, and in particular those relevant to restaurants in the
Business 1 zone and parking and loading shortfalls.
- The imposition of the
following conditions will ensure that the effects of the granting the
application are minor, and in particular that the activity shall be carried out
in accordance with all plans and information submitted with the application, and
that potential noise effects are mitigated.
- The application is
consistent with the objectives and policies of the district plan and the
sustainable management purpose of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Pursuant to section 108 of the Resource Management Act
1991, this consent is subject to the following conditions:
Activity in Accordance with
Application and Plans
- The activity shall be
carried out in accordance with the plans and all information submitted with the
application, being described as "Application for Land Use Consent" prepared by
Sarah Morrison of CKL Surveys Ltd dated January 2007 and referenced by Council
as LUC20070031201.
Monitoring
- The consent holder shall
pay to the Council a consent compliance monitoring charge of $187.38 (inclusive
of GST) plus any further monitoring charge or charges to recover the actual and
reasonable costs that have been incurred to ensure compliance with the
conditions attached to this consent. (This charge is to cover the cost of
inspecting the site, carrying out tests, reviewing conditions, updating files,
etc, all being work to ensure compliance with the resource consent).
The consent holder will
be advised of any further monitoring charge or charges as they fall due. Such
further charges are to be paid within one month of the date of invoice.
Noise
- The L10 noise
level and the maximum noise level (LMAX) arising from the restaurant
activity measured at or within the boundary of any residential zoned property
shall not exceed the following limits:
|
Monday to Saturday |
7.00am to 10.00pm |
L10 50 dBA |
|
Sunday & Public Holidays |
9.00am to 6.00pm |
|
At all other times |
L10 40 dBA
LMAX 75 dBA, or the background (L95)
plus 30 dBA, whichever is the lower |
- Disposal of empty
bottles, cans and general waste into receptacles shall not occur between 7.00pm
to 7.00am Monday to Saturday and 7.00pm to 8.00 am on Sunday and Public
Holidays.
- The doors and windows
shall be closed after 10.00pm Monday to Saturday and 6.00pm Sundays and public
holidays.
Hours of Operation
- The activity shall be
limited to the following trading hours:
ADVICE NOTES
- If you disagree with any
of the above or with any additional charges relating to the processing of the
application, you have a right of objection pursuant to section 357 of the
Resource Management Act 1991 and which shall be made in writing to Council
within 15 working days of notification of the decision. Council will, as soon as
practicable, consider the objection at a hearing. Pursuant to section 116, the
consent may not commence until such time as any objection or appeal has been
decided or withdrawn.
CARRIED
[ATTACHMENT 5.2]
5.3. 47 LUNN AVENUE, MT WELLINGTON
That, pursuant to sections 93 and 94 of the Resource
Management Act 1991, this application be processed without notice because:
- The adverse effects on the environment of the activity will be
minor, and
- There are no persons considered to be adversely affected by the
activity.
That, pursuant to section 94C, there are no special
circumstances to warrant notification.
Pursuant to section 104B of the Resource Management Act
1991, the discretionary activity land use application by Fortis Properties Ltd
to construct a three level commercial building on the site that:
- Involves the establishment of a new activity within 30m
of a Residential 6a zone;
- Involves 1086m2 of earthworks;
- Involves development of a site identified on Council
records as a soil warning area: filled weak ground and suspected unstable
ground;
- Infringes the requirement to provide no less than 50%
of that part of the site between the road boundary and a parallel line 3m
therefrom, as landscaped area;
- Infringes the 3m landscaping strip requirement on the
side yard adjoining the Residential 6a zoned land on the eastern boundary;
- Involves a car parking shortfall of 19 parking spaces
at 47 Lunn Avenue, Mt Wellington described as Lot 8 DP
348452 C/T NA199010 be granted consent.
Pursuant to section 125 of the Resource Management Act
1991, this resource consent will expire five years after the date of
commencement of consent unless, before the consent lapses;
- the consent is given
effect to; or
- an application is made to
the consent authority to extend the period of the consent, and the consent
authority decides to grant an extension after taking into account the statutory
considerations, set out in section 125(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act
1991.
Pursuant to section 113 of the Resource Management Act
1991 the following matters have been taken into account in making the decision
set above:
Relevant Statutory Provisions
The following provisions of the Resource Management Act
1991 were relevant in the assessment of this application:
- sections 104, 104B and 108 (discretionary activity)
Relevant Plan Provisions
The relevant planning documents
considered were:
Auckland City District Plan 1999 - Isthmus Section and in
particular the following:
- Clause 8.7.1 (New Activity within 30m of a Residential
Zone)
- Clause 4.3.1.2B (Development Control Modification),
- Clause 4.3.2.5 (Earthworks)
- Clause 5D.6.1.1 (Development of Unstable Ground)
- Clause 8.8.1.3C (Landscaping Strip on Road Boundary)
- Clause 8.8.1.13B (Landscaping Strip on Residential
Boundary)
- Clause 12.9.1.1 (Parking Shortfall)
- Clause 8.6.4 (Business 4 Zone Objectives and Policies)
Principal Issues in Contention
The application was not the subject of a contested
hearing as the Council generally concurs with the applicant's assessment.
Accordingly, there were no issues in contention.
Summary of Evidence
This application was not the subject of a contested
hearing. Whilst no evidence has been provided, Council has considered the
following specialists' reports:
- The Assessment of Effects prepared by John Lovett of
Lovett Planning Ltd, dated February 2007;
- The traffic assessment prepared by Don E Glover of
Design Consulting Group Ltd, dated February 2006;
- The memo prepared by Council's Development Engineer,
Scott Paton, dated 25 April 2007;
- The memo prepared by Council's Consultant Traffic
Engineer, E Ting Wong, dated 16 April 2007;
- The letter from Council's Hearings Administrator,
Stephanie MacLean, dated 3 November 2006, regarding the Urban Design Panel
Meeting held on 2 November 2006;
- The Geotechnical Completion Report prepared by Tonkin &
Taylor Ltd, dated March 2005; and
- The Geotechnical Considerations letter prepared by
Kevin Burrows of Grayson Design and Development Ltd, dated 27 March 2007.
Main Findings of Fact
The Committee considers that the
main 'findings of fact' are:
- The proposed building's scale, form and materials are
appropriate for the Business 4 zoned site and surrounding neighbourhood.
- The adverse effects of the building are minor, and are
mitigated by its location on the site, and proposed planting which will soften
its appearance.
- The parking provided on site will be sufficient to
cater for the proposed activities, given the nature of the retail activity and
the integration of activities in single tenancies.
Reasons for the Decision
The reasons for this discretionary
activity consent are as follows:
- The granting of consent
to the application will have minor effects on the environment. In particular,
the proposed scale, form and materials will result in a new commercial building
in keeping with the character of the surrounding area, and will not reduce the
amenity of adjacent residential areas. The parking provided on site will be
sufficient to cater for the proposed activities, and the development of the site
should not result in any geotechnical issues.
- The granting of consent to
the application is consistent with the relevant assessment criteria for
discretionary activities, and in particular the assessment criteria for new
activities within 30m of residential zones, earthworks, development of an
unstable site, reduction of landscaping strips, and a parking shortfall.
- The imposition of the
following conditions will ensure that the effects of granting the application
are minor, and, in particular, those conditions relating to geotechnical issues
and parking.
- The application is
consistent with the objectives and policies of the District Plan, and the
sustainable management purpose of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Conditions
Pursuant to section 108 of the Resource Management Act
1991, this consent is subject to the following conditions:
Activity in Accordance with
Application and Plans
- The activity shall be
carried out in accordance with the plans and all information submitted with the
application, being described as:
- The landscape plan entitled 'Landscape Plan for Fortis
Properties Ltd', prepared by Gail Farndale of Garden Scapes, dated November
2006;
- Lunn Ave Commercial Development 'Location, Sheet A',
'Site Location, Sheet B', 'Aerial Site, Sheet C', 'Perspective, Sheet D', 'Legal
Area, Sheet E', 'Zoning Plan, Sheet F', 'Surroundings, Sheet G1, G2', 'Quarry
Concept, Sheet H', 'Cross Section, Sheet J', 'Ground Plan. Sheet K1', 'Mezzanine
Plan, Sheet K2', 'Office Plan, Sheet K3', 'Elevations and Section, Sheet L', and
'Materials, Sheet M' prepared by Jason Chambers Young Ltd (JCY), dated 12
October 2006;
- Warehouse/Office Development 'Elevations, Sheet (2-)07'
revision B:BC, prepared by Jason Chambers Young Ltd (JCY), dated 19 April 2007
and referenced by
Council as LUC20070087101.
Monitoring
- The consent holder shall
pay to the Council a consent compliance monitoring charge of $381.44 (inclusive
of GST) plus any further monitoring charge or charges to recover the actual and
reasonable costs that have been incurred to ensure compliance with the
conditions attached to this consent. (This charge is to cover the cost of
inspecting the site, carrying out tests, reviewing conditions, updating files,
etc, all being work to ensure compliance with the resource consent).
The consent holder will
be advised of any further monitoring charge or charges as they fall due. Such
further charges are to be paid within one month of the date of invoice.
Geotechnical
- All earthworks and
foundations shall follow the recommendations of the memo prepared by Grayson
Design and Development Ltd entitled 'Development at 61 Lunn Avenue, Geotechnical
Considerations' dated 28 March 2007 and the Tonkin & Taylor report entitled
'Landco Mount Wellington Ltd, Lunn Avenue Business, Stage 1, Lots 3-8, Lunn
Avenue Geotechnical Completion Report' dated March 2005, to the satisfaction of
the Resource Consent Monitoring Leader.
Traffic and Parking
- Three parking spaces
on-site shall be designated for the disabled, as per the requirements of NZS
4121. The parks shall be conveniently located to main entrances of the
building.
- All access and
manoeuvring/turning areas as depicted on the approved plans shall be formed,
provided with an all weather surface and drained to the satisfaction of the
Council (Resource Consent Monitoring Leader), prior to the occupation of any of
the tenancies.
- The consent holder shall
submit an internal traffic management plan for approval, prior to the occupation
of any of the tenancies, indicating:
- markings and signage to facilitate safe vehicle
circulation; and
- the allocation of parking spaces for each tenancy,
including staff and customer parking spaces
to the satisfaction of
the Resource Consent Monitoring Leader.
Retaining Wall
- The retaining wall along
the northern boundary shall be constructed from materials consistent with the
existing retaining wall on the adjacent site to the west.
Landscape Plan
- The landscaping as
detailed on 'Landscape Plan for Fortis Properties Ltd', prepared by Gail Farndale of Gardenscapes, dated November 2006 shall be amended to include the
following changes and with the addition of four suitable indigenous specimen
street trees of at least pb95 and at least two metres high at the time of
planting, and re-submitted to the satisfaction of the Resource Consent
Monitoring Leader:
- All Specimen Trees that are currently listed as
Metrosideros (types of pohutukawa) shall be Metrosideros excelsa 'Parnell';
- The following underplanting shown on the Landscape
Plan: Pseudopanax (Adiantifolius Group) 'Cyril Watson', Pittosporum
tenuifolium 'Mountain Green', Hoheria populnea,
Knightia excelsa, Sophora microphylla 'Dragon's Gold' and
Metrosideros excelsa 'Vilosa Tahiti', shall be replaced with a
combination of any of the following species: Myrsine australis, Griselinia Littoralis or
Phormium tenax 'Green Dwarf" ; and
- The plant species Coprosma repens 'Poor Knights'
shall be added to the Landscape Plan along the entire length of the rear
(northern) boundary. This is a climber type plant that will grow down the
retaining wall and assist with screening it from the Quarry Floor.
The amended landscape
plan shall be implemented within the first planting season following the
completion of the works on the site. The landscaping shall be maintained and
irrigated thereafter to the satisfaction of the Resource Consent Monitoring
Leader.
- Prior to the commencement of work on the site the consent holder shall
lodge the sum of $20,000 with the Council as security for the performance of
condition (8).
- The consent holder shall either lodge the bonded sum with the Council
as a cash deposit or execute a guaranteed bond agreement, with a registered
trading bank as the surety.
- The bond document shall be prepared by the Council. The consent
holder shall pay to the Council any costs incurred by the Council in relation to
the preparation, execution, variation or release of the bond.
- The bond shall be held for a minimum period of 18 months from the
date of planting. The bond shall be released when, in the opinion of the Council
(Resource Consents Monitoring Leader), condition (8) has been satisfied, and the
consent holder has paid the Council's costs.
Earthworks
- The consent holder shall implement suitable sediment control measures
during all earthworks to ensure that all stormwater run off from the site is
managed and controlled to ensure that no silt, sediment or water containing silt
or sediment is discharged into stormwater pipes, drains, channels or soakage
systems in accordance with the Auckland City Operative District Plan 1999
(Isthmus) Annexure 14 Guidelines for sediment control. In the event that
material is deposited on the street, the consent holder shall take immediate
action at their own expense, to clean the street. These measures shall remain in
place until the completion of the development.
Construction
- Prior to the commencement of any construction or demolition on the
site, the consent holder shall submit, and have approved, a Construction
Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Council (Resource Consents Monitoring
Leader). The Construction Management Plan shall include, and may not be limited
to, specific details relating to avoiding, remedying or mitigating adverse
effects on the environment and management of all works associated with this
development as follows:
- Details of the site manager, including their contact details (phone, fascimile,
postal address);
- The location of a large noticeboard on the site that clearly identifies the
name, telephone number and address for service of the site manager;
- Measures to be adopted to maintain the site in a tidy condition in terms of
disposal/storage of rubbish, storage and unloading of building materials and
similar construction activities;
- Proposed hours of work on the site (NB: hours shall correspond with any other
condition in this consent relating to working hours).
- Measures for waste management which include designated sites for refuse bins,
and for recycling bins for glass, plastic and cans storage and collection in
accordance with the Council's waste reduction policy;
- Location of workers' conveniences (eg portaloos);
- Location of site hoardings;
The above details shall be shown on a site plan and supporting
documentation as appropriate. The approved Construction Management Plan shall be
implemented and maintained throughout the entire construction period.
- Prior to the commencement of any construction or demolition on the
site, the consent holder shall submit, and have approved, a Traffic Management
Plan to the satisfaction of the Council (Resource Consents Monitoring Leader).
The Traffic Management Plan shall include, and may not be limited to, specific
details relating to avoiding, remedying or mitigating adverse effects on the
environment and management of all works associated with this development as
follows:
- Ingress and egress to and from the site for vehicles and construction machinery
during site works period;
- Proposed numbers and timing of truck movements throughout the day and the
proposed routes;
- Proposed numbers and timing of truck movements throughout the day including
identification of heavy vehicle routes which avoid residential streets;
- Procedures for managing construction traffic;
The above details shall be shown on a site plan and supporting
documentation as appropriate. The approved Traffic Management Plan shall be
implemented and maintained throughout the entire construction period, and
updated with each ensuing Building Consent application.
- All construction and demolition works shall be restricted to the hours
from 7.30am to 6.00pm Monday to Friday and from 8.00am to 1.00pm Saturday. No
such work shall occur on Sundays or public holidays.
ADVICE NOTES
- Subject to section 198 of the Local Government Act 2002 and Auckland
City Council's Policy on Development Contributions, a development contribution
of $80,510.23(including GST) will be payable on this development. An invoice for
this amount will be sent in due course. Please note that, with respect to this
development, building consents will not be released, code of compliance
certificates will not be issued, and section 224C certificates for subdivisions
will not be issued until the development contribution has been paid. Please note
that the development contribution may be recalculated for any subsequent land
use subdivision or building consent applications in accordance with the
development contribution policy.
- The consent holder shall comply with Part 27 of the Auckland City
Consolidated Bylaw, which addresses signage, or seek a dispensation from the
Bylaw.
- The consent holder is advised that land covenants, consent notices
and encumbrances are contained on the Certificate of Title which may restrict
development on the subject site.
- The
consent holder is advised that the warehouse activities are to be used in
conjunction with the retail/showroom activity. Therefore, should the nature
activities on site change, an assessment will be required as to whether a new
resource consent is required.
- The applicant is advised that there may be trees on the property
which come within the tree protection rules set out in 5C.7.3 of the district
plan and these cannot be cut, trimmed or have work undertaken below the dripline
without a prior resource consent. If the applicant wishes to undertake the above
mentioned work, a resource consent application will need to be made to the
Council. Consent will not necessarily be granted to such an application. Any
work undertaken near protected trees should be done in accordance with Annexure
5 of the district plan.
- The
applicant needs to obtain all other necessary consents and permits, including
those under the Building Act 1991, and comply with all relevant Council Bylaws.
It is further noted that this consent does not constitute building consent
approval. Please check as to whether or not a building consent is required under
the Building Act 1991. If a building consent application is already lodged with
Council or has already been obtained, you are advised that, unless otherwise
stated, the use shall not commence until conditions of this resource consent
have been met. Furthermore, if this consent and its conditions alter or affect a
previously approved building consent for the same project, you are advised that
a new building consent may need to be applied for.
- A
copy of this consent shall be held on site at all times during the establishment
and construction phase of the activity.
- The
consent holder is requested to notify Council, in writing, of their intention to
begin works, a minimum of seven days prior to commencement. Such notification
shall be sent to the Team Leader, Compliance Monitoring and shall include the
following details:
- name and telephone number of the project manager and site owner
- site address to which the consent relates
- activity to which the consent relates
- expected duration of works.
- If
you disagree with any of the above or with any additional charges relating to
the processing of the application, you have a right of objection pursuant to
section 357 of the Resource Management Act 1991 and which shall be made in
writing to Council within 15 working days of notification of the decision.
Council will, as soon as practicable, consider the objection at a hearing.
Pursuant to section 116, the consent may not commence until such time as any
objection or appeal has been decided or withdrawn.
CARRIED
Note: Cr W A Christian declared an interest and neither spoke nor voted on
Item 5.3(having left the meeting during the debate and decision on this
item)
Note: Crs C Caughey and G Fryer requested that their vote against the decision
on
Item 5.3 be recorded. Cr F Storer consequently used her Chairman's
casting
vote on this matter.
[ATTACHMENTS 5.3A AND 5.3B]
5.4. 1104 - 1118 GREAT NORTH ROAD, POINT CHEVALIER
That,
pursuant to section 93 of the Resource Management Act 1991, this application be
processed without public notice because the adverse effects of the activity on
the environment will be minor.
Pursuant to section 94 of the Act, notice of this application be served on the
owners and occupiers at::
- 1102
Great North Road
- 1102
E Great North Road
- 1102
F Great North Road
- 1102
G Great North Road
- 1102
H -1102 J Great North Road
- Units
A - G of 1104 - 1118 Great North Road
unless the written approval of these persons is provided to the Council.
CARRIED
APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS
6.1. 89A ONSLOW AVENUE, EPSOM
- That any three persons from the following panel, as nominated by the
Planning Fixtures Committee, be appointed commissioner to hear and determine an
application to remove two Poplar trees at 89A Onslow Avenue, Epsom.
The panel is Cr C Caughey (Chairman), Cr G Fryer and Board Member B
Insull (and alternates Cr C Casey, Board Member C Farmer and Board Member C
McLaren).
- That the Chairman be authorised to appoint an alternate Commissioner
in the event that none of the above are available.
CARRIED
6.2. 10 SUSSEX STREET, GREY LYNN
- That any three persons from the following panel, as nominated by the
Planning Fixtures Committee, be appointed commissioner to hear and determine an
application to make external alterations and additions to an existing house on a
site zoned Residential 1 at 10 Sussex Street, Grey Lynn and which was processed
with service of notice.
The panel is Cr F Storer (Chairman), Board Member L Rea and Board
Member K Stanton (and alternates Cr N Abel, Cr C Casey, Board Member L Kennaway,
and Board Member G Easte).
- That the Chairman be authorised to appoint an alternate Commissioner
in the event that none of the above are available.
CARRIED
6.3. 33 SIERRA STREET, GLENDOWIE
- That any three persons from the following panel, as nominated by the
Planning Fixtures Committee, be appointed commissioner to hear and determine an
application to remove a Cedar tree at 33 Sierra Street, Glendowie.
The panel is Cr T Millar (Chairman), Cr W A Christian and Board
Member K Carter (and alternates Cr N Raffils, Cr L Leighton and Board Member J
Welch).
- That the Chairman be authorised to appoint an alternate Commissioner
in the event that none of the above are available.
CARRIED
6.4. 170A KOHIMARAMA ROAD, KOHIMARAMA
- That any three persons from the following panel, as nominated by the
Planning Fixtures Committee, be appointed commissioner to hear and determine an
application to remove a Totara tree at 170A Kohimarama Road, Kohimarama.
The panel is Cr T Millar (Chairman), Cr W A Christian and Board
Member K Carter (and alternates Cr N Raffils, Cr L Leighton and Board Member J
Welch).
- That the Chairman be authorised to appoint an alternate Commissioner
in the event that none of the above are available.
CARRIED
6.5. 21 SHIPHERDS AVENUE, EPSOM
- That any three persons from the following panel, as nominated by the
Planning Fixtures Committee, be appointed commissioner to hear and determine an
application to remove a Norfolk Island Pine tree at 21 Shipherds Avenue, Epsom.
The panel is Cr C Caughey (Chairman), Cr G Fryer and Board Member B
Insull (and alternates Cr C Casey, Board Member C Farmer and Board Member C
McLaren).
- That the Chairman be authorised to appoint an alternate Commissioner
in the event that none of the above are available.
CARRIED
6.6. 52 TIRI ROAD, ONEROA, WAIHEKE ISLAND
- That any three persons from the following panel, as nominated by the
Planning Fixtures Committee, be appointed commissioner to hear and determine an
application to construct a residential dwelling and garage on a site at 52 Tiri
Road, Oneroa, Waiheke Island which is zoned Land unit 11, Traditional
Residential under the Operative District Plan 1996 (Hauraki Gulf Islands
Section) and Island Residential 1, Traditional Residential under the Proposed
District Plan 2006 (Hauraki Gulf Islands Section 2006)
The panel is Cr G A Mulholland (Chairman), Cr F Storer and Cr T
Millar (and alternates Board Member R Ericson, Cr N Abel and Board Member K-A
Harvey).
- That the Chairman be authorised to appoint an alternate Commissioner
in the event that none of the above are available.
CARRIED
PLANNING FIXTURES COMMITTEE THROUGHOUT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTION
PERIOD
That it be recommended to Council that Independent Commissioners Mr L Simmons
(Chairman), Mr C Stewart and Ms C Hawley be appointed as independent
commissioners to sit on the Planning Fixtures Committee meetings from 16 October
2007 until the incoming Council has established a Committee structure, with
alternate Independent Commissioners Mr G Macfarlane and Ms K Sinclair.
CARRIED
REQUESTS FOR SERVICE ARISING FROM SITE VISITS AND MEETINGS
That
the summary of requests for service arising from site visits and meetings be
received.
CARRIED
APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS AND INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER DECISIONS
FOR 2006/2007
That
the summary of the appointment of commissioners and Independent Commissioner
decisions for 2006/2007 be received.
CARRIED
EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC : LOCAL GOVERNMENT
OFFICIAL INFORMATION AND MEETINGS ACT 1987
That
the public be excluded from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this
meeting.
The
general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded,
the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the
specific grounds under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.
This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government
Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or
interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be
prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of
the meeting in public, as follows:
|
Item no. |
General subject of each matter to be considered |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable) |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution |
|
C1 |
161 Landscape Road, Epsom - Resource Consent Appeal |
The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason to withhold exists under
section 7. |
Section
7(2) (j) - The withholding of the information is necessary to prevent
the disclosure or use of official information for improper gain or
improper advantage.
In particular, an appeal has been lodged with the Environment Court
against the Council's decision to refuse consent to the expansion of a
daycare centre from 21 to 50 children in the Residential 6a zone
and the disclosure of information at this stage could be used by other
parties to gain improper advantage prior to court proceedings. |
S48(1)(a): The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result
in the disclosure of information for which good reason to withhold
exists under section 6 or 7. |
|
C2 |
315-375 Mt Wellington Highway |
The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason to withhold exists under
section 7. |
Section
7(2) (j) - The withholding of the information is necessary to prevent
the disclosure or use of official information for improper gain or
improper advantage.
In particular, an appeal has been lodged with the Environment Court
against the Council's decision to refuse consent to a proposal to
construct and operate a bulk retail centre at 315-375 Mt Wellington
Highway and the disclosure of information at this stage could be used by
other parties to gain improper advantage prior to court proceedings. |
S48(1)(a): The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result
in the disclosure of information for which good reason to withhold
exists under section 6 or 7. |
CARRIED
There
being no further business the Chairman declared the meeting closed at 1.45 pm.
|