APOLOGIES
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Planning and Regulatory committee meeting
held on Thursday, 12 May 2005 to be confirmed as a true and correct record.
EXTRAORDINARY BUSINESS
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information
and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
"An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be
dealt with at that meeting if-
- The local authority by resolution so decides; and
- The presiding member explains at the meeting at a time when
it is open to the public,-
- The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
- The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed
until a subsequent meeting."
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information
and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
"Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
- That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
- That item is a minor matter relating to the general business
of the local authority; and
- The presiding member explains at the beginning of the
meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be
discussed at the meeting; but
- no resolution, decision, or recommendation may be made in
respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of
the local authority for further discussion."
PUBLIC FORUM
A period of time (approximately 20 minutes) is set aside for
members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated
authority. A maximum of 5 minutes per item is allowed, following which there
may be questions from members.
At the close of agenda no requests had been received to speak in public
forum.
AUCKLAND CITY ENVIRONMENT QUARTERLY OPERATIONAL REPORT APRIL TO JUNE 2005
| J Oxley |
|
| Group Manager Auckland City Environments |
5 July 2005 |
Updating the committee on the Group's performance and key
activities over the three month period April to June 2005.
REPORTS REQUESTED/PENDING
| K Quensell |
|
| Hearings Services Manager |
12 July 2005 |
Attaching the Reports Requested/Pending for the month of July
2005 from the Hearings Services Manager.
Recommending that the report be received.
| [ATTACHMENT 6] |
Pages 9-10 |
REACHING FOR A BETTER STANDARD: THE MOVE TOWARDS 2ND GENERATION
PLANS
| Cr Glenda Fryer |
|
| Chairman, Planning & Regulatory committee |
13 July 2005 |
Community Board Member C Dempsey will be addressing the
committee on the review/renewal of the District Plan.
| [ATTACHMENT 7] |
Pages 11-14 |
BYLAW REVIEW PROGRAMME
| K Bell |
|
| Manager Isthmus & Islands |
1 July 2005 |
Providing the committee with a status report on current reviews,
and Community Board feedback, on the bylaw review programme.
Recommending steps for the continued processing of the bylaw
reviews.
| [ATTACHMENT 8] |
Pages 15-26 |
PROPOSED PRIVATE PLAN CHANGE AUCKLAND TROTTING CLUB ALEXANDRA
PARK, EPSOM
| P Hall |
|
| Consultant Planner, Boffa Miskell Limited |
11 July 2005 |
Advising the committee of the application for a private plan
change lodged by The Auckland Trotting Club (Inc) ("ATC") to the District Plan
concept plan E09-32, which applies to Alexandra Park.
Recommending that :
- That the request for a private plan change by the Auckland Trotting Club
(inc) be accepted in principle and the committee Chair be authorised to accept
the final version of the plan change, subject to the satisfactory resolution of
the outstanding traffic matters.
- That, pending the satisfactory resolution of the outstanding traffic
matters, the committee Chair authorise the Manager: Isthmus and Islands Resource
Management to commence the necessary statutory procedures for the public
notification of the private plan change with a submission period of 20 working
days.
| [ATTACHMENT 9] |
Pages 27-70 |
NOISE CONTROL SERVICE AND KPI'S
| J McDougall |
|
| Environmental Health Specialist - Noise |
27 June 2005 |
Providing the committee with information on the current
processes that council has in resolving noise complaints and managing on-going
noise issues around the city.
Recommending that the report of J McDougall, Environmental
Health Specialist dated 27 June 2005 be received.
| [ATTACHMENT 10] |
Pages 71-74 |
DOG APPEAL HEARINGS
| C Connell |
|
| Animal Control Contract Manager |
1 July 2005 |
Advising the committee of the current classification processes
for dog/dog owners under the Dog Control Act, and mechanisms to consider
objections to classification.
Recommending the committee set up a special meeting to consider
objections to the classifications of dogs as 'dangerous' or 'menacing' and of
dog owners as 'probationary' or 'disqualified'.
| [ATTACHMENT 11] |
Pages 75-80 |
SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS ENFORCEMENT
| W Adler |
|
| Service Requests Manager |
8 July 2005 |
Updating the committee on the signs and billboard enforcement
being undertaken by Auckland City Council.
Recommending that the report of W Adler, Service Requests
Manager, dated 8 July 2005 regarding signs and billboard enforcement be
received.
| [ATTACHMENT 12] |
Pages 81-84 |
ONEROA SOUTHERN SERVICE LANE EXTEND LAPSE PERIOD FOR PROPOSED
SOUTHERN SERVICE LANE DESIGNATION
| G Tang |
|
| Assistant Transport Planner |
7 July 2005 |
Advising the committee of the proposed Oneroa southern service
lane designation.
Recommending that the lapse period for the designation be fixed
at twelve years from the expiry of the current designation.
| [ATTACHMENT 13] |
Pages 85-92 |
CENTRAL AREA WEST BUS PRIORITIES, BYLAW ALTERATION
| S Knarston |
|
| Manager Transport Policies and Projects |
6 July 2005 |
Advising the committee that the final adjustment of the Central
Area West bus priority project saw several minor changes to the scheme and that
two of these changes require alteration of the bylaws to bring them into effect.
Recommending that the committee recommend to council changes
that need addressing through the bylaw process for the Central Area West bus
lane scheme.
| [ATTACHMENT 14] |
Pages 93-94 |
CENTRAL AREA WEST BUS PRIORITIES
| K Quensell |
|
| Hearings Services Manager |
15 July 2005 |
This item was considered by the Transport & Urban Linkages
committee at its meeting held 8 July 2005, the committee resolved:
That it be a recommendation to the Planning and Regulatory
committee:
- That the following clauses of section 25.5.5 of the
Consolidated Bylaw be altered to read:
- The traffic lane on the western side of Albert
Street:
- Commencing at a point 7 metres north of the
northern kerb alignment of Swanson Street and terminating at a point 6.5 metres
south of the southern kerb alignment of Wolfe Street.
- That section 25.5.8 of the Consolidated Bylaw be
altered to include the following clauses:
- Proceed straight ahead across Fanshawe Street from
the northbound left turn only lane of Albert Street at all times.
Recommending that the resolutions of the Transport & Urban
Linkages committee be received.
RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS FOR SENSITIVE SITES WITHIN
THE WARD
| K Quensell |
|
| Hearings Services Manager |
13 July 2005 |
At its meeting held 25 May 2005 the Eden/Albert Community Board
resolved that :
- That the Board notes the following areas of
sensitive sites in the Eden/Albert Ward, namely:
- Kingsland shops
- Balmoral shops
- Mt Eden village
- Valley Road shops
- Sandringham Road shops
- Maungawhau [and any residential sites bounding
Mt Eden]
- Owairaka [and any residential sites bounding Mt
Albert]
- Mt Albert shops
The shopping areas are identified on planning maps as
generally Business 2 zone. Maungawhau and Owairaka are identified on planning
maps.
- That the Planning & Regulatory committee be
requested to:
- recommend to the General Manager City Planning and
the Manager Auckland City Environments such sites to Auckland City Environments
staff via memorandum and by identification within the GIS and computer systems
used by Auckland City Environments regulatory consent planners.
- recommend the need for the General Manager City
Planning and the Manager Auckland City Environments to give written and verbal
directions and explanations to Auckland City planning staff to explain how site
sensitivity arises, to be aware of sensitivity surrounding these sites, and that
planning staff be requested to take particular care and attention, including
carrying out their duties under the Resource Management Act, in assessing
applications for resource consent within the general confines of these sites.
- That the Board recommends to the Planning &
Regulatory committee:
- the need to examine closely the assessment of
environmental effects checklist utilised by Auckland City Environments consent
processing when processing resource consents, and to modify such checklist if
necessary; and
- that officers investigate the development of a system
by which the quality of decisions made by regulatory planning staff can be
measured.
- That the Board notes that the Ministry for
Environment's semi-annual RMA auditing process focuses undue attention on the
speed with which a resource consent is processed, and that this is not balanced
by a similar focus on the quality of decisions delivered by such processing.
- That the Board further notes that the Ministry for
the Environment will be undertaking the next RMA survey of local authorities in
the 2005/2006 financial year, that the survey questionnaire will be released
before 30 June 2005, and that responses will be collected from local authorities
after 31 July 2006.
- That the Board recommends to the Planning &
Regulatory committee that any resource consent applications for sensitive sites
in the Eden/Albert ward, as identified, be excluded from any Ministry for
Environment auditing process.
Recommending that the information be considered.
| [ATTACHMENT 16] |
Pages 95-102 |
AUCKLAND ART GALLERY DEVELOPMENT AND ALBERT PARK
| K Quensell |
|
| Hearings Services Manager |
13 July 2005 |
At its meeting held 6 July 2005 the Arts, Culture & Recreation
committee resolved inter alia:
- That it be a recommendation to the Planning and
Regulatory committee that the Commissioners that are appointed to hear any
objections to the designation and land use consents also be appointed to hear,
at the same time if appropriate, any objections to the Reserves Act change of
classification proposal.
Recommending that the committee consider the recommendation from
the Arts Culture & Recreation committee.
PLAN CHANGE 71 MIXED USE ZONE
| K Bell |
|
| Manager Isthmus & Islands |
29 June 2005 |
Advising the committee of the Environment Court approval of
Council's application to make plan change 71 (mixed use zone) operative in
part.
Requesting the committee recommend to council :
- That plan 71 (Mixed use zone) as amended by the
Environment Court consent orders, be approved and incorporated into the Auckland
City District Plan: Isthmus Section 1999.
- That the manager: isthmus and islands resource
management be authorised to publicly notify the date on which plan change 71
will become operative in part.
| [ATTACHMENT 18] |
Pages 106-185 |
PLAN CHANGE 97 TAMAKI CAMPUS
| K Dorofaeff |
|
| Senior Planner |
28 June 2005 |
Advising the committee of the Environment Court consent order settling the
appeal lodged to Plan Change 97 (Tamaki Campus) and requesting that the
committee recommended to council :
- That plan change 97 for Tamaki Campus, as amended by the
Environment Court, consent order, be approved and incorporated into the Auckland
City District Plan: Isthmus Section 1999.
- That the manager: isthmus and islands resource management be
authorised to publicly notify the date on which plan change 97 will become
operative.
| [ATTACHMENT 19] |
Pages 186-197 |
APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS
20.1. PLAN CHANGE 142 PANMURE GROWTH AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AND LOCAL VIEW
PROTECTION
| K Quensell |
|
| Hearings Services Manager |
13 July 2005 |
At its meeting held 21 June 2005 the Planning Fixtures committee
resolved inter alia :
That it be recommended to the Planning and Regulatory
committee that Hearings Commissioners Councillors Glenda Fryer (Chairman), Cr
Bill Christian, Cr Christine Caughey, Cr Graeme Mulholland, Cr Faye Storer, Cr
Leila Boyle and Cr Neil Abel, subject to availability, be appointed to hear
submissions to Plan Change 142 Panmure Growth Area Structure Plan and local
view protection.
20.2. APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONER/S FOR A BYLAW AND POLICY AMENDMENT
| K Bell, |
|
| Manager Isthmus & Islands |
1 June 2005 |
Requesting commissioner/s be appointed to hear verbal
submissions and consider written submissions to Council's proposed amendments to
Council's policy on dogs and the dog control bylaw.
| [ATTACHMENT 20.2] |
Pages 198-199 |
20.3. ISTHMUS DISTRICT PLAN: PLAN MODIFICATIONS 123 AND 123A.
PLAN CHANGE 123 "MT EDEN CENTRE PLAN" AND VARIATION 123A
| S Parsons |
|
| Senior Planner |
5 July 2005 |
Requesting hearings commissioners be appointed to the hearing
for the Isthmus District Plan: Plan modifications 123 and 123A (Plan Change 123
"Mt Eden Centre Plan" and Variation 123A).
| [ATTACHMENT 20.3] |
Pages 200-201 |
20.4. ISTHMUS DISTRICT PLAN: PLAN MODIFICATIONS 132 AND 132A
PLAN CHANGE 132 "CHARACTER OVERLAY" AND VARIATION 132A
| S Parsons |
|
| Senior Planner |
5 July 2005 |
Requesting that commissioners be appointed to the hearing of
submissions for Isthmus District Plan: Plan modifications 132 and 132A (Plan
Change 132 "Character Overlay" and Variation 132A).
| [ATTACHMENT 20.4] |
Pages 202-203 |
20.5. HAURAKI GULF DISTRICT PLAN: PLAN MODIFICATION 23A
VARIATION TO PLAN MODIFICATION 23 "SUBDIVISION"
| S Parsons |
|
| Senior Planner |
5 July 2005 |
Requesting the appointment of commissioners to the hearing for
Hauraki Gulf District Plan: Plan Modification 23A (Variation to Plan
modification 23 "Subdivision").
| [ATTACHMENT 20.5] |
Pages 204-205 |
20.6. ISTHMUS DISTRICT PLAN: PLAN CHANGE 156
REZONING OF LAND
| K Elliff |
|
| Senior Planner |
1 July 2005 |
Requesting the appointment of commissioners to the hearing for
Isthmus District Plan: Plan change 156 (Rezoning of land).
| [ATTACHMENT 20.6] |
Pages 206-207 |
20.7. PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 145 AND VARIATION 145A TO THE
ISTHMUS DISTRICT PLAN: ST HELIERS CENTRE PLAN
| M Hewitt |
|
| Senior Planner Isthmus & Islands |
11 July 2005 |
Requesting the appointment of commissioners to the hearing for
proposed plan change 145 and variation 145A to the Isthmus District Plan: St
Heliers Centre Plan.
| [ATTACHMENT 20.7] |
Pages 208 |
EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC : LOCAL GOVERNMENT
OFFICIAL INFORMATION AND MEETINGS ACT 1987
| Kevin Quensell |
|
| Hearings Services Manager |
15 Jul 2005 |
|
Section 48, Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987: |
The following motion is submitted for consideration:
That the public be excluded from the following part(s) of the
proceedings of this meeting.
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the
public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter, and the specific grounds under Section 48(1) of the Local Government
Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution
are as follows:
|
Item No. |
General subject of each matter to be considered |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution |
|
C1. |
Proposed Plan Change 183 Inclusion Of Additional Buildings
For Scheduling In The Auckland City District Plan (Isthmus Section). |
Good Reason to withhold exists under section 7 |
Section 48(1)(a) |
|
C2 |
Proposed Plan Change 5 To The Operative Auckland City
District Plan (Central Area Section 2004) Character Building Demolition
Controls |
Good Reason to withhold exists under section 7 |
Section 48(1)(a) |
This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the
Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular
interest or interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which
would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the
proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:
| Item No. |
Reason to withhold information under section 7 |
|
| C1. |
To protect information where the making
available of the information would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the
commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the
information. |
[Section 7(2)(b)(ii)] |
| C2. |
To protect information where the making
available of the information would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the
commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the
information. |
[Section 7(2)(b)(ii)] |