Council member and meetings
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND REGULATORY COMMITTEE
HELD ON THURSDAY, 14 SEPTEMBER 2006 AT 9.35am
|
PRESENT: |
Councillors: |
Glenda |
Fryer |
[Chair] |
|
|
|
Neil |
Abel |
[From 9.38am item 4] |
|
|
|
Dr Cathy |
Casey |
|
|
|
|
Bill |
Christian, JP |
|
|
|
|
Toni |
Millar, JP |
|
|
|
|
Penny |
Sefuiva |
[From 9.40 item 4] |
|
|
|
Faye |
Storer |
[From 9.38 item 4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABSENT: |
|
Graeme |
Mulholland, JP |
|
APOLOGIES
That the
apologies from Cr Hucker, Cr Raffills, Cr Armstrong and Cr Caughey for
non-attendance be accepted.
CARRIED
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
That the minutes
of the Planning and Regulatory Committee meeting held on Monday, 7 August 2006
be confirmed as a true and correct record.
CARRIED
EXTRAORDINARY BUSINESS
There was no
extraordinary business.
PUBLIC FORUM
4.1. SUBMISSIONS PROCESS FOR RESOURCE CONSENTS
- That Mr Demler, Ms Power and Ms Wilkin be thanked
for their presentation on the submission process for resource consents.
- That the issues raised by Mr Demler namely the role and consultation
with section 274 parties, and including the subdivision of Residential 1 land be
referred to the General Manager City Development for report back to the Planning
and Regulatory Committee's November meeting.
CARRIED
4.2 RAIL BELLS NOISE
- That Ms Rea be thanked for her
presentation regarding noise from rail bells noises in the Eden/Albert ward.
- That the Group Manager Transport - Strategy,
Policy & Projects:
- write to On-Track drawing attention to the
issues with noise at railway crossings [particularly pedestrian rail crossings]
and seeking a reduction in noise levels for alarm bells to 75db; and
- write to the Auckland Regional Transport
Authority (ARTA) and the other territorial local authorities seeking their
support for Auckland City Council's advocacy for a reduction in noise levels at
railway crossings.
CARRIED
REPORTS PENDING/REQUESTED
That the summary of Reports Pending/Requested from the Hearings Services Manager
dated 7 September 2006 be received.
CARRIED
ANIMAL CONTROL ANNUAL REPORT
That the report of the Animal Control Contract Manager dated 28 August 2006 be
received.
CARRIED
FINDINGS OF THE ALCOHOL RESEARCH TO INFORM THE DECISION MAKING OF
AUCKLAND CITY
That the of the Safer Auckland City Coordinator dated 20 July 2006,
be received.
CARRIED
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO LEASES OF AIRSPACE OR SUBSOIL OF ROADS
POLICY
- That the 2001 policy in respect of the leasing
of airspace or subsoil of roads be amended as follows:
- That the definition of 'building projection'
in paragraph (a) be amended:
Building projection: means any structure which protrudes into the road
reserve and is attached to a building. This may include a verandah, a balcony,
an awning, an eave, a minor architectural feature or a retaining wall.
[Underlined text indicates recommended addition. Strikethrough text indicates
recommended deletion]
- That the definition of 'overbuilding' in
paragraph (a) be amended as follows:
Overbuilding: means any structure which utilises council airspace for the
purpose for providing additional floor area for an adjacent property. Such a
structure may include enclosed verandahs, balconies which provide additional
floor area for commercial purposes and structures, and structures which
extend across the width of the street.
[Underlined text indicates recommended addition. Strikethrough text indicates
recommended deletion]
- hat paragraph (d) be amended to refer to
the need to clearly establish a public benefit in considering whether to grant a
lease of airspace to a pedestrian overpass as follows:
- The council will not approve the grant of a
lease of airspace for a pedestrian overpass unless a public benefit is clearly
established and it is satisfied that pedestrian and it is satisfied that
pedestrian safety is otherwise at risk.
[Underlined text indicates recommended addition]
- That a new paragraph (f) be added to the
policy providing guidance as to the meaning of 'public benefit':
- Consideration of whether a proposed structure
within council airspace will have a public benefit is based on criteria
including, but not limited to the following:
Whether the structure
- positively contributes to the articulation of the building's
façade and to the building's integration into the streetscape
- generally enhances that street environment
- is at a sufficient height and of an appropriate width,
length and bulk that is consistent with Crime Prevention through Environmental
Design principles
- avoids infringing views to significant landmarks or valued
built and natural landscapes
- does not unduly block access to sunlight or adversely affect
the wind environment in the street
- positively contributes to energy efficiency or
implementation of other sustainability principles
- that the public benefit outweigh any private gain.
- That the General Manager City Development
report to the Committee on opportunities to:
- achieve the upgrade of existing footpath verandahs to
acceptable design and amenity standards.
- enforce the street numbering bylaw.
CARRIED
REVIEW OF THE BUILDING CODE
That the report
titled Review of the Building Code by the Strategy Manager dated 21 July 2006 be
received.
CARRIED
URGENT DECISION - PLAN CHANGE 7
That the
memorandum from K Quensell, Hearings Services Manager regarding Urgent Decision
for Plan Change 7 dated 25 August 2006 be received.
CARRIED
EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC : LOCAL GOVERNMENT
OFFICIAL INFORMATION AND MEETINGS ACT 1987
That the public
be excluded from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.
The general
subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason
for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds
under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings
Act 187 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
|
Item No. |
General subject of
each matter to be considered |
Reason for passing
this resolution in relation to each matter |
Ground(s) under
section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution |
|
C1. |
Auckland City's
Microchipping Policy |
Good Reason to
withhold exists under section 7 |
Section 48(1)(a) |
|
C2 |
Signs And Billboards
Bylaws - Options For Revision |
Good Reason to
withhold exists under section 7 |
Section 48(1)(a) |
This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local
Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular
interest or interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which
would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the
proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows:
|
Item No. |
Reason to withhold
information under section 7 |
|
|
C1. |
To maintain legal professional
privilege. |
[Section 7(2)(g)] |
|
C2. |
To maintain legal professional
privilege. |
[Section 7(2)(g)] |
CARRIED
AUCKLAND CITY'S MICROCHIPPING POLICY
- That item C1 "Auckland City Microchipping
Policy" be dealt with in the open agenda of the meeting except for the legal
advice to Council.
- That the report titled Auckland City's
Microchipping Policy by the Animal Control Contract Manager dated 29 August 2006
be received.
- That the Committee note the legal opinion
regarding the microchipping law's enforcement.
- That the Auckland City's dog microchipping
policy be amended to include the following under "(D) Dogs registered in New
Zealand for the first time on or after 1 July 2006":
- owners to be sent a reminder notice of un-microchipped dogs
- issue warning notice 11 months after the reminder
- issue infringement notice one month after the warning notice i.e.
one year after microchipping due date.
There being no further business the Chairman declared the
meeting closed at 12:05 pm.