Auckland Council website.
This website has changed
This is the former Auckland City Council website, which has some of the information and services you need if you live or do business in the area. Go to the main Auckland Council website to access the complete range of council services.
Skip navigation
Plans, policies and reports
Plans, policies and reports

Hauraki Gulf Islands  review

<< Back to contents

Issues and options papers

Heritage


Issue
Heritage resources cover many aspects of our environment, and include buildings, sites, objects, trees, landscapes, landforms, archaeological and geological sites and ecological areas. District Plans have a responsibility to secure the preservation and maintenance of these resources for the experience and enjoyment of present and future generations as well as preserving their intrinsic values and finite characteristics.

The Hauraki Gulf has a rich legacy of widely appreciated elements, both natural and built. However, recent research into heritage issues within the Hauraki Gulf indicates that the current District Plan poorly defines and protects heritage values. The Hauraki Gulf Islands Plan review offers an opportunity to introduce a thorough and robust heritage system and protection mechanisms for the Hauraki Gulf.

Heritage resources are an essential part of the Hauraki Gulf's environmental and cultural values. Their retention adds to the body of cultural experience and is part of an essential cultural framework that helps inspire and bind the community. Conservation of heritage resources is an important way to enhance the identity and amenity the Hauraki Gulf offers both its residents and visitors.

The Resource Management Amendment Act 2004 elevated all heritage to being a "matter of national importance", and hence escalated its significance in relation to other issues covered by that legislation. The amendment also emphasises the need for territorial authorities to maintain indigenous biological diversity. As biodiversity and ecology fit within the broad heritage spectrum there is now greater emphasis on this issue than there was when the current District Plan was written.

In managing the use and development of the district's natural and physical resources, the Council is required to have particular regard to the recognition and protection of the heritage value of sites, buildings, places or areas. To give effect to this obligation, the Plan may:

  • identify those heritage resources worthy of preservation; and 
  • adopt suitable measures to secure the preservation of identified heritage resources.

Therefore, the Plan should attend to the protection of a number of heritage features: natural, cultural and scientific. A detailed heritage assessment and related provisions have not previously been included in the HGI District Plan. New evaluation systems have been established for the different disciplines to recognise heritage values in the Gulf in the context of its particular history and scale of value. Since the Hauraki Gulf is so extensive it will not be feasible to undertake a full assessment of all heritage aspects for the whole of the Gulf. It is instead necessary to focus on particular parts of the Gulf where development pressures are most acute, particularly Waiheke and Rakino Islands.

Auckland City's heritage division, along with a team of specialists in the various areas of heritage, have been engaged in a zero-based site survey and review of all Gulf heritage, concentrating initially in the inner islands of Waiheke, Rakino, Rotoroa, Motutatpu, Motukorea, Rangitoto, Motuihe and Pakatoa.

Possible approaches

You may have a better or alternative approach to those outlined below. If so, we would like to hear from you.

  • Status quo. Roll over the existing heritage provisions within the current District Plan. This would provide limited protection for heritage resources in the Hauraki Gulf and would not include new data from surveys.
  • Continue the heritage assessment of the entire Hauraki Gulf and develop an appropriate assessment system for each of the heritage aspects. Criteria would be determined for each heritage aspect so that trigger points for resource consents could be developed. Monitoring would be through resource consents granted. This would ensure that the inclusion of any heritage system did not differentiate between the Inner and Outer Islands. However, it is unlikely that there would be sufficient resources or time to complete a full heritage assessment for the entire Hauraki Gulf prior to notification of the Hauraki Gulf Islands Plan review.
  • Implement the completed heritage assessment of the Inner Gulf islands and complete the development of appropriate assessment system for each of the heritage aspects. This would mean heritage aspects that are the most at threat through development pressures would be afforded protection through the District Plan. A plan change could later be introduced for the Outer Islands when resources became available. This approach would differentiate between the Inner and Outer Islands and leave the heritage resources of the Outer Islands with limited protection until a plan change was developed.

Note:

While this issue paper can be read in isolation, it is best read in association with the issue papers relating to: